Comparison of three methods for measuring the time spent in physical activity

Barbara Ainsworth, Jr Bassett D.R., S. J. Strath, A. M. Swartz, W. L. O'Brien, R. W. Thompson, D. A. Jones, C. A. Macera, C. D. Kimsey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

271 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Three methods for measuring time spent in daily physical activity (PA) were compared during a 21-d period among 83 adults (38 men and 45 women). Methods: Each day, participants wore a Computer Science and Applications, Inc. (CSA) monitor and completed a 1-page, 48-item PA log that reflected time spent in household, occupational, transportation, sport, conditioning, and leisure activities. Once a week, participants also completed a telephone survey to identify the number of minutes spent each week in nonoccupational walking and in moderate intensity and hard/very hard-intensity PA. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Spearman rank-order correlations. Three equations developed to compute CSA cut points for moderate and hard/very hard PA were also compared with the PA logs and PA survey. Results: There was modest to good agreement for the time spent in different PA intensity categories between the three CSA cut point methods (r = 0.43-0.94, P < 0.001). Correlations between the CSA and PA logs ranged from r = 0.22 to r = 0.36, depending on the comparisons. Correlations between the survey items and PA logs were r = 0.26-0.54 (P < 0.01) for moderate and walking activities and r < 0.09 (P > 0.05) for hard/very hard activities. Correlations between the survey items and the CSA min per day varied according to the method used to compute the CSA intensity cut points. Conclusions: The results were consistent with findings from other PA validation studies that show motion sensors, PA logs, and surveys reflect PA; however, these methods do not always provide similar estimates of the time spent in resting/light, moderate, or hard/very hard PA.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalMedicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
Volume32
Issue number9 SUPPL.
StatePublished - 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Exercise
Validation Studies
Leisure Activities
Telephone
Walking
Sports
Light
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Accelerometer
  • CSA
  • Energy expenditure
  • Epidemiology
  • Exercise
  • Measurement
  • Survey

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Ainsworth, B., Bassett D.R., J., Strath, S. J., Swartz, A. M., O'Brien, W. L., Thompson, R. W., ... Kimsey, C. D. (2000). Comparison of three methods for measuring the time spent in physical activity. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 32(9 SUPPL.).

Comparison of three methods for measuring the time spent in physical activity. / Ainsworth, Barbara; Bassett D.R., Jr; Strath, S. J.; Swartz, A. M.; O'Brien, W. L.; Thompson, R. W.; Jones, D. A.; Macera, C. A.; Kimsey, C. D.

In: Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, Vol. 32, No. 9 SUPPL., 2000.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ainsworth, B, Bassett D.R., J, Strath, SJ, Swartz, AM, O'Brien, WL, Thompson, RW, Jones, DA, Macera, CA & Kimsey, CD 2000, 'Comparison of three methods for measuring the time spent in physical activity', Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, vol. 32, no. 9 SUPPL..
Ainsworth B, Bassett D.R. J, Strath SJ, Swartz AM, O'Brien WL, Thompson RW et al. Comparison of three methods for measuring the time spent in physical activity. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2000;32(9 SUPPL.).
Ainsworth, Barbara ; Bassett D.R., Jr ; Strath, S. J. ; Swartz, A. M. ; O'Brien, W. L. ; Thompson, R. W. ; Jones, D. A. ; Macera, C. A. ; Kimsey, C. D. / Comparison of three methods for measuring the time spent in physical activity. In: Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2000 ; Vol. 32, No. 9 SUPPL.
@article{fb2a38d8465f488a9f65260bba8b7222,
title = "Comparison of three methods for measuring the time spent in physical activity",
abstract = "Purpose: Three methods for measuring time spent in daily physical activity (PA) were compared during a 21-d period among 83 adults (38 men and 45 women). Methods: Each day, participants wore a Computer Science and Applications, Inc. (CSA) monitor and completed a 1-page, 48-item PA log that reflected time spent in household, occupational, transportation, sport, conditioning, and leisure activities. Once a week, participants also completed a telephone survey to identify the number of minutes spent each week in nonoccupational walking and in moderate intensity and hard/very hard-intensity PA. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Spearman rank-order correlations. Three equations developed to compute CSA cut points for moderate and hard/very hard PA were also compared with the PA logs and PA survey. Results: There was modest to good agreement for the time spent in different PA intensity categories between the three CSA cut point methods (r = 0.43-0.94, P < 0.001). Correlations between the CSA and PA logs ranged from r = 0.22 to r = 0.36, depending on the comparisons. Correlations between the survey items and PA logs were r = 0.26-0.54 (P < 0.01) for moderate and walking activities and r < 0.09 (P > 0.05) for hard/very hard activities. Correlations between the survey items and the CSA min per day varied according to the method used to compute the CSA intensity cut points. Conclusions: The results were consistent with findings from other PA validation studies that show motion sensors, PA logs, and surveys reflect PA; however, these methods do not always provide similar estimates of the time spent in resting/light, moderate, or hard/very hard PA.",
keywords = "Accelerometer, CSA, Energy expenditure, Epidemiology, Exercise, Measurement, Survey",
author = "Barbara Ainsworth and {Bassett D.R.}, Jr and Strath, {S. J.} and Swartz, {A. M.} and O'Brien, {W. L.} and Thompson, {R. W.} and Jones, {D. A.} and Macera, {C. A.} and Kimsey, {C. D.}",
year = "2000",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
journal = "Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise",
issn = "0195-9131",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "9 SUPPL.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of three methods for measuring the time spent in physical activity

AU - Ainsworth, Barbara

AU - Bassett D.R., Jr

AU - Strath, S. J.

AU - Swartz, A. M.

AU - O'Brien, W. L.

AU - Thompson, R. W.

AU - Jones, D. A.

AU - Macera, C. A.

AU - Kimsey, C. D.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Purpose: Three methods for measuring time spent in daily physical activity (PA) were compared during a 21-d period among 83 adults (38 men and 45 women). Methods: Each day, participants wore a Computer Science and Applications, Inc. (CSA) monitor and completed a 1-page, 48-item PA log that reflected time spent in household, occupational, transportation, sport, conditioning, and leisure activities. Once a week, participants also completed a telephone survey to identify the number of minutes spent each week in nonoccupational walking and in moderate intensity and hard/very hard-intensity PA. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Spearman rank-order correlations. Three equations developed to compute CSA cut points for moderate and hard/very hard PA were also compared with the PA logs and PA survey. Results: There was modest to good agreement for the time spent in different PA intensity categories between the three CSA cut point methods (r = 0.43-0.94, P < 0.001). Correlations between the CSA and PA logs ranged from r = 0.22 to r = 0.36, depending on the comparisons. Correlations between the survey items and PA logs were r = 0.26-0.54 (P < 0.01) for moderate and walking activities and r < 0.09 (P > 0.05) for hard/very hard activities. Correlations between the survey items and the CSA min per day varied according to the method used to compute the CSA intensity cut points. Conclusions: The results were consistent with findings from other PA validation studies that show motion sensors, PA logs, and surveys reflect PA; however, these methods do not always provide similar estimates of the time spent in resting/light, moderate, or hard/very hard PA.

AB - Purpose: Three methods for measuring time spent in daily physical activity (PA) were compared during a 21-d period among 83 adults (38 men and 45 women). Methods: Each day, participants wore a Computer Science and Applications, Inc. (CSA) monitor and completed a 1-page, 48-item PA log that reflected time spent in household, occupational, transportation, sport, conditioning, and leisure activities. Once a week, participants also completed a telephone survey to identify the number of minutes spent each week in nonoccupational walking and in moderate intensity and hard/very hard-intensity PA. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Spearman rank-order correlations. Three equations developed to compute CSA cut points for moderate and hard/very hard PA were also compared with the PA logs and PA survey. Results: There was modest to good agreement for the time spent in different PA intensity categories between the three CSA cut point methods (r = 0.43-0.94, P < 0.001). Correlations between the CSA and PA logs ranged from r = 0.22 to r = 0.36, depending on the comparisons. Correlations between the survey items and PA logs were r = 0.26-0.54 (P < 0.01) for moderate and walking activities and r < 0.09 (P > 0.05) for hard/very hard activities. Correlations between the survey items and the CSA min per day varied according to the method used to compute the CSA intensity cut points. Conclusions: The results were consistent with findings from other PA validation studies that show motion sensors, PA logs, and surveys reflect PA; however, these methods do not always provide similar estimates of the time spent in resting/light, moderate, or hard/very hard PA.

KW - Accelerometer

KW - CSA

KW - Energy expenditure

KW - Epidemiology

KW - Exercise

KW - Measurement

KW - Survey

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033813134&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033813134&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10993415

AN - SCOPUS:0033813134

VL - 32

JO - Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise

JF - Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise

SN - 0195-9131

IS - 9 SUPPL.

ER -