Comparison of Front End Planning Practices for Small and Large Industrial Construction Projects

Wesley Collins, Kristen Parrish, Edd Gibson

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

The Construction Industry Institute (CII) has developed a suite of tools, namely the Project Definition Rating Index (PDRI) tools, to provide a structured front end planning approach for industrial, building, and infrastructure project types. CII has developed two tools for industrial projects: the PDRI - Industrial Projects, meant for use on large, complex projects, and the PDRI - Small Industrial Projects, for use on lower complexity projects. Previous research has shown that many aspect of small and large projects differ, but no direct comparison between the planning practices of these two distinct project types has been completed. This paper provides a detailed quantitative and qualitative analysis of the two industrial-focused PDRI tools discerning the specific front end planning similarities and differences between small and large industrial projects. Three conclusions were found through the analysis: (1) the rigor of the front end planning process should match the rigor of the project at hand, (2) small industrial projects have more pronounced renovation and revamp project considerations during front end planning than large industrial projects, and (3) the front end planning process for small industrial projects should be more focused on project execution as opposed to project feasibility.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationConstruction Research Congress 2016: Old and New Construction Technologies Converge in Historic San Juan - Proceedings of the 2016 Construction Research Congress, CRC 2016
PublisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
Pages150-158
Number of pages9
ISBN (Electronic)9780784479827
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016
EventConstruction Research Congress 2016: Old and New Construction Technologies Converge in Historic San Juan, CRC 2016 - San Juan, Puerto Rico
Duration: May 31 2016Jun 2 2016

Other

OtherConstruction Research Congress 2016: Old and New Construction Technologies Converge in Historic San Juan, CRC 2016
CountryPuerto Rico
CitySan Juan
Period5/31/166/2/16

Fingerprint

Planning
Construction industry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Building and Construction

Cite this

Collins, W., Parrish, K., & Gibson, E. (2016). Comparison of Front End Planning Practices for Small and Large Industrial Construction Projects. In Construction Research Congress 2016: Old and New Construction Technologies Converge in Historic San Juan - Proceedings of the 2016 Construction Research Congress, CRC 2016 (pp. 150-158). American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784479827.016

Comparison of Front End Planning Practices for Small and Large Industrial Construction Projects. / Collins, Wesley; Parrish, Kristen; Gibson, Edd.

Construction Research Congress 2016: Old and New Construction Technologies Converge in Historic San Juan - Proceedings of the 2016 Construction Research Congress, CRC 2016. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2016. p. 150-158.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Collins, W, Parrish, K & Gibson, E 2016, Comparison of Front End Planning Practices for Small and Large Industrial Construction Projects. in Construction Research Congress 2016: Old and New Construction Technologies Converge in Historic San Juan - Proceedings of the 2016 Construction Research Congress, CRC 2016. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), pp. 150-158, Construction Research Congress 2016: Old and New Construction Technologies Converge in Historic San Juan, CRC 2016, San Juan, Puerto Rico, 5/31/16. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784479827.016
Collins W, Parrish K, Gibson E. Comparison of Front End Planning Practices for Small and Large Industrial Construction Projects. In Construction Research Congress 2016: Old and New Construction Technologies Converge in Historic San Juan - Proceedings of the 2016 Construction Research Congress, CRC 2016. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). 2016. p. 150-158 https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784479827.016
Collins, Wesley ; Parrish, Kristen ; Gibson, Edd. / Comparison of Front End Planning Practices for Small and Large Industrial Construction Projects. Construction Research Congress 2016: Old and New Construction Technologies Converge in Historic San Juan - Proceedings of the 2016 Construction Research Congress, CRC 2016. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2016. pp. 150-158
@inproceedings{310408d46b4d4e6aae3c4865d4faa737,
title = "Comparison of Front End Planning Practices for Small and Large Industrial Construction Projects",
abstract = "The Construction Industry Institute (CII) has developed a suite of tools, namely the Project Definition Rating Index (PDRI) tools, to provide a structured front end planning approach for industrial, building, and infrastructure project types. CII has developed two tools for industrial projects: the PDRI - Industrial Projects, meant for use on large, complex projects, and the PDRI - Small Industrial Projects, for use on lower complexity projects. Previous research has shown that many aspect of small and large projects differ, but no direct comparison between the planning practices of these two distinct project types has been completed. This paper provides a detailed quantitative and qualitative analysis of the two industrial-focused PDRI tools discerning the specific front end planning similarities and differences between small and large industrial projects. Three conclusions were found through the analysis: (1) the rigor of the front end planning process should match the rigor of the project at hand, (2) small industrial projects have more pronounced renovation and revamp project considerations during front end planning than large industrial projects, and (3) the front end planning process for small industrial projects should be more focused on project execution as opposed to project feasibility.",
author = "Wesley Collins and Kristen Parrish and Edd Gibson",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1061/9780784479827.016",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "150--158",
booktitle = "Construction Research Congress 2016: Old and New Construction Technologies Converge in Historic San Juan - Proceedings of the 2016 Construction Research Congress, CRC 2016",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
address = "United States",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Comparison of Front End Planning Practices for Small and Large Industrial Construction Projects

AU - Collins, Wesley

AU - Parrish, Kristen

AU - Gibson, Edd

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - The Construction Industry Institute (CII) has developed a suite of tools, namely the Project Definition Rating Index (PDRI) tools, to provide a structured front end planning approach for industrial, building, and infrastructure project types. CII has developed two tools for industrial projects: the PDRI - Industrial Projects, meant for use on large, complex projects, and the PDRI - Small Industrial Projects, for use on lower complexity projects. Previous research has shown that many aspect of small and large projects differ, but no direct comparison between the planning practices of these two distinct project types has been completed. This paper provides a detailed quantitative and qualitative analysis of the two industrial-focused PDRI tools discerning the specific front end planning similarities and differences between small and large industrial projects. Three conclusions were found through the analysis: (1) the rigor of the front end planning process should match the rigor of the project at hand, (2) small industrial projects have more pronounced renovation and revamp project considerations during front end planning than large industrial projects, and (3) the front end planning process for small industrial projects should be more focused on project execution as opposed to project feasibility.

AB - The Construction Industry Institute (CII) has developed a suite of tools, namely the Project Definition Rating Index (PDRI) tools, to provide a structured front end planning approach for industrial, building, and infrastructure project types. CII has developed two tools for industrial projects: the PDRI - Industrial Projects, meant for use on large, complex projects, and the PDRI - Small Industrial Projects, for use on lower complexity projects. Previous research has shown that many aspect of small and large projects differ, but no direct comparison between the planning practices of these two distinct project types has been completed. This paper provides a detailed quantitative and qualitative analysis of the two industrial-focused PDRI tools discerning the specific front end planning similarities and differences between small and large industrial projects. Three conclusions were found through the analysis: (1) the rigor of the front end planning process should match the rigor of the project at hand, (2) small industrial projects have more pronounced renovation and revamp project considerations during front end planning than large industrial projects, and (3) the front end planning process for small industrial projects should be more focused on project execution as opposed to project feasibility.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84976351202&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84976351202&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/9780784479827.016

DO - 10.1061/9780784479827.016

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84976351202

SP - 150

EP - 158

BT - Construction Research Congress 2016: Old and New Construction Technologies Converge in Historic San Juan - Proceedings of the 2016 Construction Research Congress, CRC 2016

PB - American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)

ER -