Comparison of Frequentist and Bayesian Regularization in Structural Equation Modeling

Ross Jacobucci, Kevin Grimm

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Research in regularization, as applied to structural equation modeling (SEM), remains in its infancy. Specifically, very little work has compared regularization approaches across both frequentist and Bayesian estimation. The purpose of this study was to address just that, demonstrating both similarity and distinction across estimation frameworks, while specifically highlighting more recent developments in Bayesian regularization. This is accomplished through the use of two empirical examples that demonstrate both ridge and lasso approaches across both frequentist and Bayesian estimation, along with detail regarding software implementation. We conclude with a discussion of future research, advocating for increased evaluation and synthesis across both Bayesian and frequentist frameworks.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)639-649
Number of pages11
JournalStructural Equation Modeling
Volume25
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 4 2018

Keywords

  • Bayesian
  • Regularization
  • factor analysis
  • lasso
  • ridge
  • shrinkage
  • structural equation modeling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Decision Sciences(all)
  • Modeling and Simulation
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of Frequentist and Bayesian Regularization in Structural Equation Modeling'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this