Comparing visual search and eye movements in bilinguals and monolinguals

Ileana Ratiu, Michael C. Hout, Stephen C. Walenchok, Tamiko Azuma, Stephen Goldinger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent research has suggested that bilinguals show advantages over monolinguals in visual search tasks, although these findings have been derived from global behavioral measures of accuracy and response times. In the present study we sought to explore the bilingual advantage by using more sensitive eyetracking techniques across three visual search experiments. These spatially and temporally fine-grained measures allowed us to carefully investigate any nuanced attentional differences between bilinguals and monolinguals. Bilingual and monolingual participants completed visual search tasks that varied in difficulty. The experiments required participants to make careful discriminations in order to detect target Landolt Cs among similar distractors. In Experiment 1, participants performed both feature and conjunction search. In Experiments 2 and 3, participants performed visual search while making different types of speeded discriminations, after either locating the target or mentally updating a constantly changing target. The results across all experiments revealed that bilinguals and monolinguals were equally efficient at guiding attention and generating responses. These findings suggest that the bilingual advantage does not reflect a general benefit in attentional guidance, but could reflect more efficient guidance only under specific task demands.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-31
Number of pages31
JournalAttention, Perception, and Psychophysics
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - May 15 2017

Fingerprint

Eye Movements
Reaction Time
experiment
Research
discrimination
Visual Search
Experiment
Guidance
Discrimination

Keywords

  • Attentional control
  • Bilingualism
  • Eye movements
  • Visual search

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

Comparing visual search and eye movements in bilinguals and monolinguals. / Ratiu, Ileana; Hout, Michael C.; Walenchok, Stephen C.; Azuma, Tamiko; Goldinger, Stephen.

In: Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 15.05.2017, p. 1-31.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{adda7858aa974f9393fd81ba35c43e92,
title = "Comparing visual search and eye movements in bilinguals and monolinguals",
abstract = "Recent research has suggested that bilinguals show advantages over monolinguals in visual search tasks, although these findings have been derived from global behavioral measures of accuracy and response times. In the present study we sought to explore the bilingual advantage by using more sensitive eyetracking techniques across three visual search experiments. These spatially and temporally fine-grained measures allowed us to carefully investigate any nuanced attentional differences between bilinguals and monolinguals. Bilingual and monolingual participants completed visual search tasks that varied in difficulty. The experiments required participants to make careful discriminations in order to detect target Landolt Cs among similar distractors. In Experiment 1, participants performed both feature and conjunction search. In Experiments 2 and 3, participants performed visual search while making different types of speeded discriminations, after either locating the target or mentally updating a constantly changing target. The results across all experiments revealed that bilinguals and monolinguals were equally efficient at guiding attention and generating responses. These findings suggest that the bilingual advantage does not reflect a general benefit in attentional guidance, but could reflect more efficient guidance only under specific task demands.",
keywords = "Attentional control, Bilingualism, Eye movements, Visual search",
author = "Ileana Ratiu and Hout, {Michael C.} and Walenchok, {Stephen C.} and Tamiko Azuma and Stephen Goldinger",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "15",
doi = "10.3758/s13414-017-1328-3",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--31",
journal = "Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics",
issn = "1943-3921",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing visual search and eye movements in bilinguals and monolinguals

AU - Ratiu, Ileana

AU - Hout, Michael C.

AU - Walenchok, Stephen C.

AU - Azuma, Tamiko

AU - Goldinger, Stephen

PY - 2017/5/15

Y1 - 2017/5/15

N2 - Recent research has suggested that bilinguals show advantages over monolinguals in visual search tasks, although these findings have been derived from global behavioral measures of accuracy and response times. In the present study we sought to explore the bilingual advantage by using more sensitive eyetracking techniques across three visual search experiments. These spatially and temporally fine-grained measures allowed us to carefully investigate any nuanced attentional differences between bilinguals and monolinguals. Bilingual and monolingual participants completed visual search tasks that varied in difficulty. The experiments required participants to make careful discriminations in order to detect target Landolt Cs among similar distractors. In Experiment 1, participants performed both feature and conjunction search. In Experiments 2 and 3, participants performed visual search while making different types of speeded discriminations, after either locating the target or mentally updating a constantly changing target. The results across all experiments revealed that bilinguals and monolinguals were equally efficient at guiding attention and generating responses. These findings suggest that the bilingual advantage does not reflect a general benefit in attentional guidance, but could reflect more efficient guidance only under specific task demands.

AB - Recent research has suggested that bilinguals show advantages over monolinguals in visual search tasks, although these findings have been derived from global behavioral measures of accuracy and response times. In the present study we sought to explore the bilingual advantage by using more sensitive eyetracking techniques across three visual search experiments. These spatially and temporally fine-grained measures allowed us to carefully investigate any nuanced attentional differences between bilinguals and monolinguals. Bilingual and monolingual participants completed visual search tasks that varied in difficulty. The experiments required participants to make careful discriminations in order to detect target Landolt Cs among similar distractors. In Experiment 1, participants performed both feature and conjunction search. In Experiments 2 and 3, participants performed visual search while making different types of speeded discriminations, after either locating the target or mentally updating a constantly changing target. The results across all experiments revealed that bilinguals and monolinguals were equally efficient at guiding attention and generating responses. These findings suggest that the bilingual advantage does not reflect a general benefit in attentional guidance, but could reflect more efficient guidance only under specific task demands.

KW - Attentional control

KW - Bilingualism

KW - Eye movements

KW - Visual search

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019258522&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019258522&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/s13414-017-1328-3

DO - 10.3758/s13414-017-1328-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 28508116

AN - SCOPUS:85019258522

SP - 1

EP - 31

JO - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

JF - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

SN - 1943-3921

ER -