Comparing the Effects of Single- and Multiple-Component Therapies for Insomnia on Sleep Outcomes

Souraya Sidani, Dana Epstein, Mary Fox, Laura Collins

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Background: Single- and multiple-component therapies are recommended in professional guidelines for managing chronic insomnia. Systematic reviews point to insufficient evidence of the comparative effectiveness of these therapies, which is required for treatment decision making. Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of three single-component and one multiple-component therapies on short-term sleep outcomes. Methods: The data were obtained from 517 persons with chronic insomnia, enrolled in a partially randomized preference trial. They were allocated to the single-component therapies: sleep education and hygiene (SEH), stimulus control therapy (SCT), and sleep restriction therapy (SRT), or the multiple-component therapy (MCT). The outcomes, perceived insomnia severity and sleep parameters, were assessed with established measures at pre and posttest. Repeated measure analysis of variance was used to compare the outcomes across therapy groups over time. The clinical relevance of the therapies’ effects was evaluated by examining the effect size and remission rate. Results: The four therapies differed in their effectiveness in reducing perceived insomnia severity and improving sleep outcomes. SEH was least effective. SCT, SRT, and MCT were moderately effective. SCT and SRT demonstrated slightly higher remission rates than MCT for perceived insomnia severity and some sleep parameters. Linking Evidence to Action: SCT and SRT are viable single-component therapies that produce clinical benefits. Single-component insomnia treatment may be more convenient to implement in the primary care setting due to the reduced number of treatment recommendations compared to MCT.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)195-203
    Number of pages9
    JournalWorldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing
    Volume16
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jun 1 2019

    Fingerprint

    Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders
    Sleep
    Therapeutics
    Education

    Keywords

    • behavioral therapy
    • clinical benefits
    • comparative effectiveness
    • insomnia
    • multicomponent therapy
    • perceived insomnia severity
    • sleep hygiene education
    • sleep outcomes
    • sleep restriction therapy
    • stimulus control therapy

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Nursing(all)

    Cite this

    Comparing the Effects of Single- and Multiple-Component Therapies for Insomnia on Sleep Outcomes. / Sidani, Souraya; Epstein, Dana; Fox, Mary; Collins, Laura.

    In: Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, Vol. 16, No. 3, 01.06.2019, p. 195-203.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{edb0879d6cd745438c5c661913c450b4,
    title = "Comparing the Effects of Single- and Multiple-Component Therapies for Insomnia on Sleep Outcomes",
    abstract = "Background: Single- and multiple-component therapies are recommended in professional guidelines for managing chronic insomnia. Systematic reviews point to insufficient evidence of the comparative effectiveness of these therapies, which is required for treatment decision making. Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of three single-component and one multiple-component therapies on short-term sleep outcomes. Methods: The data were obtained from 517 persons with chronic insomnia, enrolled in a partially randomized preference trial. They were allocated to the single-component therapies: sleep education and hygiene (SEH), stimulus control therapy (SCT), and sleep restriction therapy (SRT), or the multiple-component therapy (MCT). The outcomes, perceived insomnia severity and sleep parameters, were assessed with established measures at pre and posttest. Repeated measure analysis of variance was used to compare the outcomes across therapy groups over time. The clinical relevance of the therapies’ effects was evaluated by examining the effect size and remission rate. Results: The four therapies differed in their effectiveness in reducing perceived insomnia severity and improving sleep outcomes. SEH was least effective. SCT, SRT, and MCT were moderately effective. SCT and SRT demonstrated slightly higher remission rates than MCT for perceived insomnia severity and some sleep parameters. Linking Evidence to Action: SCT and SRT are viable single-component therapies that produce clinical benefits. Single-component insomnia treatment may be more convenient to implement in the primary care setting due to the reduced number of treatment recommendations compared to MCT.",
    keywords = "behavioral therapy, clinical benefits, comparative effectiveness, insomnia, multicomponent therapy, perceived insomnia severity, sleep hygiene education, sleep outcomes, sleep restriction therapy, stimulus control therapy",
    author = "Souraya Sidani and Dana Epstein and Mary Fox and Laura Collins",
    year = "2019",
    month = "6",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1111/wvn.12367",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "16",
    pages = "195--203",
    journal = "Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing",
    issn = "1545-102X",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "3",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Comparing the Effects of Single- and Multiple-Component Therapies for Insomnia on Sleep Outcomes

    AU - Sidani, Souraya

    AU - Epstein, Dana

    AU - Fox, Mary

    AU - Collins, Laura

    PY - 2019/6/1

    Y1 - 2019/6/1

    N2 - Background: Single- and multiple-component therapies are recommended in professional guidelines for managing chronic insomnia. Systematic reviews point to insufficient evidence of the comparative effectiveness of these therapies, which is required for treatment decision making. Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of three single-component and one multiple-component therapies on short-term sleep outcomes. Methods: The data were obtained from 517 persons with chronic insomnia, enrolled in a partially randomized preference trial. They were allocated to the single-component therapies: sleep education and hygiene (SEH), stimulus control therapy (SCT), and sleep restriction therapy (SRT), or the multiple-component therapy (MCT). The outcomes, perceived insomnia severity and sleep parameters, were assessed with established measures at pre and posttest. Repeated measure analysis of variance was used to compare the outcomes across therapy groups over time. The clinical relevance of the therapies’ effects was evaluated by examining the effect size and remission rate. Results: The four therapies differed in their effectiveness in reducing perceived insomnia severity and improving sleep outcomes. SEH was least effective. SCT, SRT, and MCT were moderately effective. SCT and SRT demonstrated slightly higher remission rates than MCT for perceived insomnia severity and some sleep parameters. Linking Evidence to Action: SCT and SRT are viable single-component therapies that produce clinical benefits. Single-component insomnia treatment may be more convenient to implement in the primary care setting due to the reduced number of treatment recommendations compared to MCT.

    AB - Background: Single- and multiple-component therapies are recommended in professional guidelines for managing chronic insomnia. Systematic reviews point to insufficient evidence of the comparative effectiveness of these therapies, which is required for treatment decision making. Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of three single-component and one multiple-component therapies on short-term sleep outcomes. Methods: The data were obtained from 517 persons with chronic insomnia, enrolled in a partially randomized preference trial. They were allocated to the single-component therapies: sleep education and hygiene (SEH), stimulus control therapy (SCT), and sleep restriction therapy (SRT), or the multiple-component therapy (MCT). The outcomes, perceived insomnia severity and sleep parameters, were assessed with established measures at pre and posttest. Repeated measure analysis of variance was used to compare the outcomes across therapy groups over time. The clinical relevance of the therapies’ effects was evaluated by examining the effect size and remission rate. Results: The four therapies differed in their effectiveness in reducing perceived insomnia severity and improving sleep outcomes. SEH was least effective. SCT, SRT, and MCT were moderately effective. SCT and SRT demonstrated slightly higher remission rates than MCT for perceived insomnia severity and some sleep parameters. Linking Evidence to Action: SCT and SRT are viable single-component therapies that produce clinical benefits. Single-component insomnia treatment may be more convenient to implement in the primary care setting due to the reduced number of treatment recommendations compared to MCT.

    KW - behavioral therapy

    KW - clinical benefits

    KW - comparative effectiveness

    KW - insomnia

    KW - multicomponent therapy

    KW - perceived insomnia severity

    KW - sleep hygiene education

    KW - sleep outcomes

    KW - sleep restriction therapy

    KW - stimulus control therapy

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066811576&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066811576&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1111/wvn.12367

    DO - 10.1111/wvn.12367

    M3 - Article

    C2 - 31165577

    AN - SCOPUS:85066811576

    VL - 16

    SP - 195

    EP - 203

    JO - Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing

    JF - Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing

    SN - 1545-102X

    IS - 3

    ER -