Comparing learning from observing and from human tutoring

Kasia Muldner, Rachel Lam, Michelene Chi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A promising instructional approach corresponds to learning by observing others learn (i.e., by watching tutorial dialogue between a tutor and tutee). However, more work is needed to understand this approach's pedagogical utility. Thus, in 2 experiments we compared student learning from collaborative observation of dialogue with 2 other instructional contexts: 1-on-1 human tutoring and collaborative observation of monologue. In Study 1 (N = 50), there was no significant difference in learning outcomes between the dialogue and tutoring conditions, while the dialogue condition was superior to the monologue condition. Study 2 (N = 40), which involved a younger population than in Study 1, did not replicate these results, in that students learned less from observing dialogue than from being tutored, and there was no significant difference between the dialogue and monologue conditions. To shed light on our results, we analyzed the verbal data collected during the 2 experiments. This analysis showed that in Study 1, the dialogue observers generated more substantive contributions than did the monologue observers. In contrast, in Study 2 there was no significant difference between the observers in terms of substantive contributions; moreover, the total number of contributions was modest, which may have hindered observer learning in that study. In general, our findings suggest that collaboratively observing tutorial dialogue is a promising learning paradigm, but more work is needed to understand how to support young students to effectively learn in this paradigm.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)69-85
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Educational Psychology
Volume106
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2014

Fingerprint

dialogue
Learning
learning
Students
Observation
paradigm
student
experiment
tutor
Population

Keywords

  • Collaborative observation
  • Emergent topics
  • Human tutoring

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Education

Cite this

Comparing learning from observing and from human tutoring. / Muldner, Kasia; Lam, Rachel; Chi, Michelene.

In: Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 106, No. 1, 02.2014, p. 69-85.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Muldner, Kasia ; Lam, Rachel ; Chi, Michelene. / Comparing learning from observing and from human tutoring. In: Journal of Educational Psychology. 2014 ; Vol. 106, No. 1. pp. 69-85.
@article{c24b7d0723b84ffebf5e1fd97417d274,
title = "Comparing learning from observing and from human tutoring",
abstract = "A promising instructional approach corresponds to learning by observing others learn (i.e., by watching tutorial dialogue between a tutor and tutee). However, more work is needed to understand this approach's pedagogical utility. Thus, in 2 experiments we compared student learning from collaborative observation of dialogue with 2 other instructional contexts: 1-on-1 human tutoring and collaborative observation of monologue. In Study 1 (N = 50), there was no significant difference in learning outcomes between the dialogue and tutoring conditions, while the dialogue condition was superior to the monologue condition. Study 2 (N = 40), which involved a younger population than in Study 1, did not replicate these results, in that students learned less from observing dialogue than from being tutored, and there was no significant difference between the dialogue and monologue conditions. To shed light on our results, we analyzed the verbal data collected during the 2 experiments. This analysis showed that in Study 1, the dialogue observers generated more substantive contributions than did the monologue observers. In contrast, in Study 2 there was no significant difference between the observers in terms of substantive contributions; moreover, the total number of contributions was modest, which may have hindered observer learning in that study. In general, our findings suggest that collaboratively observing tutorial dialogue is a promising learning paradigm, but more work is needed to understand how to support young students to effectively learn in this paradigm.",
keywords = "Collaborative observation, Emergent topics, Human tutoring",
author = "Kasia Muldner and Rachel Lam and Michelene Chi",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1037/a0034448",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "106",
pages = "69--85",
journal = "Journal of Educational Psychology",
issn = "0022-0663",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing learning from observing and from human tutoring

AU - Muldner, Kasia

AU - Lam, Rachel

AU - Chi, Michelene

PY - 2014/2

Y1 - 2014/2

N2 - A promising instructional approach corresponds to learning by observing others learn (i.e., by watching tutorial dialogue between a tutor and tutee). However, more work is needed to understand this approach's pedagogical utility. Thus, in 2 experiments we compared student learning from collaborative observation of dialogue with 2 other instructional contexts: 1-on-1 human tutoring and collaborative observation of monologue. In Study 1 (N = 50), there was no significant difference in learning outcomes between the dialogue and tutoring conditions, while the dialogue condition was superior to the monologue condition. Study 2 (N = 40), which involved a younger population than in Study 1, did not replicate these results, in that students learned less from observing dialogue than from being tutored, and there was no significant difference between the dialogue and monologue conditions. To shed light on our results, we analyzed the verbal data collected during the 2 experiments. This analysis showed that in Study 1, the dialogue observers generated more substantive contributions than did the monologue observers. In contrast, in Study 2 there was no significant difference between the observers in terms of substantive contributions; moreover, the total number of contributions was modest, which may have hindered observer learning in that study. In general, our findings suggest that collaboratively observing tutorial dialogue is a promising learning paradigm, but more work is needed to understand how to support young students to effectively learn in this paradigm.

AB - A promising instructional approach corresponds to learning by observing others learn (i.e., by watching tutorial dialogue between a tutor and tutee). However, more work is needed to understand this approach's pedagogical utility. Thus, in 2 experiments we compared student learning from collaborative observation of dialogue with 2 other instructional contexts: 1-on-1 human tutoring and collaborative observation of monologue. In Study 1 (N = 50), there was no significant difference in learning outcomes between the dialogue and tutoring conditions, while the dialogue condition was superior to the monologue condition. Study 2 (N = 40), which involved a younger population than in Study 1, did not replicate these results, in that students learned less from observing dialogue than from being tutored, and there was no significant difference between the dialogue and monologue conditions. To shed light on our results, we analyzed the verbal data collected during the 2 experiments. This analysis showed that in Study 1, the dialogue observers generated more substantive contributions than did the monologue observers. In contrast, in Study 2 there was no significant difference between the observers in terms of substantive contributions; moreover, the total number of contributions was modest, which may have hindered observer learning in that study. In general, our findings suggest that collaboratively observing tutorial dialogue is a promising learning paradigm, but more work is needed to understand how to support young students to effectively learn in this paradigm.

KW - Collaborative observation

KW - Emergent topics

KW - Human tutoring

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892934534&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84892934534&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0034448

DO - 10.1037/a0034448

M3 - Article

VL - 106

SP - 69

EP - 85

JO - Journal of Educational Psychology

JF - Journal of Educational Psychology

SN - 0022-0663

IS - 1

ER -