Comparing Contract Administration Functions for Alternative and Traditional Delivery of Highway Projects

Dean Papajohn, Mounir El Asmar, Keith R. Molenaar, Doug Alleman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Agency roles and responsibilities for contract administration depend on the contracting method. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has encouraged agencies to consider alternative contracting methods (ACMs) like design-build (DB) and construction manager/general contractor (CM/GC). There is a lack of information available to transportation agencies regarding the details of agency-performed contract administration functions between ACMs and traditional design-bid-build (DBB) delivery. This paper contributes to the existing body of knowledge of highway contract administration by revealing similarities and differences between agency-performed contract administration functions across contracting methods through the development of integrated definition function models (IDEF0). These IDEF0 models depict the hierarchy of contract administration functions for DBB, CM/GC, and DB highway projects and reveal differences such as developing alignment, administering preconstruction services, managing work packages, and creating risk pools for additional scope. The findings can help agencies make more informed decisions about selecting and administering contracting methods, especially as they relate to establishing the level of effort and skills needed for administering projects under various contracting methods. In addition, these IDEF0 models provide a novel framework for future research on highway contract administration.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number04019038
JournalJournal of Management in Engineering
Volume36
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2020

Fingerprint

Contractors
Managers
Highway administration
Contract administration
Contracting
Bid
Design/build
Alignment
Integrated
Responsibility
Body of knowledge

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Industrial relations
  • Engineering(all)
  • Strategy and Management
  • Management Science and Operations Research

Cite this

Comparing Contract Administration Functions for Alternative and Traditional Delivery of Highway Projects. / Papajohn, Dean; El Asmar, Mounir; Molenaar, Keith R.; Alleman, Doug.

In: Journal of Management in Engineering, Vol. 36, No. 1, 04019038, 01.01.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{85525fa214494dc28b792e7029c82b89,
title = "Comparing Contract Administration Functions for Alternative and Traditional Delivery of Highway Projects",
abstract = "Agency roles and responsibilities for contract administration depend on the contracting method. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has encouraged agencies to consider alternative contracting methods (ACMs) like design-build (DB) and construction manager/general contractor (CM/GC). There is a lack of information available to transportation agencies regarding the details of agency-performed contract administration functions between ACMs and traditional design-bid-build (DBB) delivery. This paper contributes to the existing body of knowledge of highway contract administration by revealing similarities and differences between agency-performed contract administration functions across contracting methods through the development of integrated definition function models (IDEF0). These IDEF0 models depict the hierarchy of contract administration functions for DBB, CM/GC, and DB highway projects and reveal differences such as developing alignment, administering preconstruction services, managing work packages, and creating risk pools for additional scope. The findings can help agencies make more informed decisions about selecting and administering contracting methods, especially as they relate to establishing the level of effort and skills needed for administering projects under various contracting methods. In addition, these IDEF0 models provide a novel framework for future research on highway contract administration.",
author = "Dean Papajohn and {El Asmar}, Mounir and Molenaar, {Keith R.} and Doug Alleman",
year = "2020",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000727",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
journal = "Journal of Management in Engineering - ASCE",
issn = "0742-597X",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing Contract Administration Functions for Alternative and Traditional Delivery of Highway Projects

AU - Papajohn, Dean

AU - El Asmar, Mounir

AU - Molenaar, Keith R.

AU - Alleman, Doug

PY - 2020/1/1

Y1 - 2020/1/1

N2 - Agency roles and responsibilities for contract administration depend on the contracting method. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has encouraged agencies to consider alternative contracting methods (ACMs) like design-build (DB) and construction manager/general contractor (CM/GC). There is a lack of information available to transportation agencies regarding the details of agency-performed contract administration functions between ACMs and traditional design-bid-build (DBB) delivery. This paper contributes to the existing body of knowledge of highway contract administration by revealing similarities and differences between agency-performed contract administration functions across contracting methods through the development of integrated definition function models (IDEF0). These IDEF0 models depict the hierarchy of contract administration functions for DBB, CM/GC, and DB highway projects and reveal differences such as developing alignment, administering preconstruction services, managing work packages, and creating risk pools for additional scope. The findings can help agencies make more informed decisions about selecting and administering contracting methods, especially as they relate to establishing the level of effort and skills needed for administering projects under various contracting methods. In addition, these IDEF0 models provide a novel framework for future research on highway contract administration.

AB - Agency roles and responsibilities for contract administration depend on the contracting method. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has encouraged agencies to consider alternative contracting methods (ACMs) like design-build (DB) and construction manager/general contractor (CM/GC). There is a lack of information available to transportation agencies regarding the details of agency-performed contract administration functions between ACMs and traditional design-bid-build (DBB) delivery. This paper contributes to the existing body of knowledge of highway contract administration by revealing similarities and differences between agency-performed contract administration functions across contracting methods through the development of integrated definition function models (IDEF0). These IDEF0 models depict the hierarchy of contract administration functions for DBB, CM/GC, and DB highway projects and reveal differences such as developing alignment, administering preconstruction services, managing work packages, and creating risk pools for additional scope. The findings can help agencies make more informed decisions about selecting and administering contracting methods, especially as they relate to establishing the level of effort and skills needed for administering projects under various contracting methods. In addition, these IDEF0 models provide a novel framework for future research on highway contract administration.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072736071&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072736071&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000727

DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000727

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85072736071

VL - 36

JO - Journal of Management in Engineering - ASCE

JF - Journal of Management in Engineering - ASCE

SN - 0742-597X

IS - 1

M1 - 04019038

ER -