Comparing comprehension measured by multiple-choice and open-ended questions

Yasuhiro Ozuru, Stephen Briner, Christopher A. Kurby, Danielle McNamara

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study compared the nature of text comprehension as measured by multiple-choice format and open-ended format questions. Participants read a short text while explaining preselected sentences. After reading the text, participants answered open-ended and multiple-choice versions of the same questions based on their memory of the text content. The results indicated that performance on open-ended questions was correlated with the quality of self-explanations, but performance on multiple-choice questions was correlated with the level of prior knowledge related to the text. These results suggest that open-ended and multiple-choice format questions measure different aspects of comprehension processes. The results are discussed in terms of dual process theories of text comprehension.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)215-227
Number of pages13
JournalCanadian Journal of Experimental Psychology
Volume67
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2013

Fingerprint

Reading

Keywords

  • learning
  • measurement of comprehension
  • memory
  • reading comprehension

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Comparing comprehension measured by multiple-choice and open-ended questions. / Ozuru, Yasuhiro; Briner, Stephen; Kurby, Christopher A.; McNamara, Danielle.

In: Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol. 67, No. 3, 09.2013, p. 215-227.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ozuru, Yasuhiro ; Briner, Stephen ; Kurby, Christopher A. ; McNamara, Danielle. / Comparing comprehension measured by multiple-choice and open-ended questions. In: Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2013 ; Vol. 67, No. 3. pp. 215-227.
@article{04b184ee139f4d6aabb93dedea391b9c,
title = "Comparing comprehension measured by multiple-choice and open-ended questions",
abstract = "This study compared the nature of text comprehension as measured by multiple-choice format and open-ended format questions. Participants read a short text while explaining preselected sentences. After reading the text, participants answered open-ended and multiple-choice versions of the same questions based on their memory of the text content. The results indicated that performance on open-ended questions was correlated with the quality of self-explanations, but performance on multiple-choice questions was correlated with the level of prior knowledge related to the text. These results suggest that open-ended and multiple-choice format questions measure different aspects of comprehension processes. The results are discussed in terms of dual process theories of text comprehension.",
keywords = "learning, measurement of comprehension, memory, reading comprehension",
author = "Yasuhiro Ozuru and Stephen Briner and Kurby, {Christopher A.} and Danielle McNamara",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1037/a0032918",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "67",
pages = "215--227",
journal = "Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology",
issn = "1196-1961",
publisher = "Canadian Psychological Association",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing comprehension measured by multiple-choice and open-ended questions

AU - Ozuru, Yasuhiro

AU - Briner, Stephen

AU - Kurby, Christopher A.

AU - McNamara, Danielle

PY - 2013/9

Y1 - 2013/9

N2 - This study compared the nature of text comprehension as measured by multiple-choice format and open-ended format questions. Participants read a short text while explaining preselected sentences. After reading the text, participants answered open-ended and multiple-choice versions of the same questions based on their memory of the text content. The results indicated that performance on open-ended questions was correlated with the quality of self-explanations, but performance on multiple-choice questions was correlated with the level of prior knowledge related to the text. These results suggest that open-ended and multiple-choice format questions measure different aspects of comprehension processes. The results are discussed in terms of dual process theories of text comprehension.

AB - This study compared the nature of text comprehension as measured by multiple-choice format and open-ended format questions. Participants read a short text while explaining preselected sentences. After reading the text, participants answered open-ended and multiple-choice versions of the same questions based on their memory of the text content. The results indicated that performance on open-ended questions was correlated with the quality of self-explanations, but performance on multiple-choice questions was correlated with the level of prior knowledge related to the text. These results suggest that open-ended and multiple-choice format questions measure different aspects of comprehension processes. The results are discussed in terms of dual process theories of text comprehension.

KW - learning

KW - measurement of comprehension

KW - memory

KW - reading comprehension

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884548310&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884548310&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0032918

DO - 10.1037/a0032918

M3 - Article

C2 - 24041303

AN - SCOPUS:84884548310

VL - 67

SP - 215

EP - 227

JO - Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology

JF - Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology

SN - 1196-1961

IS - 3

ER -