Comparing bycatch mitigation strategies for vulnerable marine megafauna

J. Senko, E. R. White, S. S. Heppell, Leah Gerber

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Marine megafauna such as seabirds, marine mammals and sea turtles are subject to high mortality from incidental capture or bycatch in fisheries. Recent research suggests that fishing effort is increasing worldwide, highlighting the need to evaluate strategies intended to reduce marine megafauna bycatch. Here, we use three focal species (i.e. leatherback turtle Dermochelys coriacea, black-footed albatross Phoebastria nigripes and vaquita porpoise Phocoena sinus) as case studies to compare management outcomes of four bycatch mitigation measures: time-area closures, individual bycatch limits, gear modifications and buy-outs. Time-area closures were used for leatherbacks and vaquitas with limited effectiveness, although timing, size and enforcement influenced their efficacy. Individual bycatch limits were employed for leatherbacks in one fishery, sometimes simultaneously with gear modifications and closures. Gear modifications consistently reduced bycatch of leatherbacks and black-footed albatross and showed strong promise for vaquitas. True buy-outs were only used for vaquitas and were costly, most fishers were unwilling to be bought out, and it is unclear if they reduced bycatch. Our review suggests that gear modifications were the most widely used and generally most promising technique for these species, although management outcomes of each strategy depended largely on the species-fishery interaction, fishery characteristics and socioeconomic context. Based on lessons learned from our case studies, we outline when and where a particular approach may be most effective, provide recommendations for improving each strategy and highlight priorities for future research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)5-18
Number of pages14
JournalAnimal Conservation
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2014

Fingerprint

bycatch
mitigation
fishery
turtle
porpoise
fishing effort
marine mammal
seabird
mortality

Keywords

  • Buy-outs
  • Bycatch limits
  • Bycatch mitigation
  • Gear modifications
  • Marine megafauna
  • Time-area closures

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

Comparing bycatch mitigation strategies for vulnerable marine megafauna. / Senko, J.; White, E. R.; Heppell, S. S.; Gerber, Leah.

In: Animal Conservation, Vol. 17, No. 1, 02.2014, p. 5-18.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Senko, J. ; White, E. R. ; Heppell, S. S. ; Gerber, Leah. / Comparing bycatch mitigation strategies for vulnerable marine megafauna. In: Animal Conservation. 2014 ; Vol. 17, No. 1. pp. 5-18.
@article{d8a01f2168f54a90843e4d624516025f,
title = "Comparing bycatch mitigation strategies for vulnerable marine megafauna",
abstract = "Marine megafauna such as seabirds, marine mammals and sea turtles are subject to high mortality from incidental capture or bycatch in fisheries. Recent research suggests that fishing effort is increasing worldwide, highlighting the need to evaluate strategies intended to reduce marine megafauna bycatch. Here, we use three focal species (i.e. leatherback turtle Dermochelys coriacea, black-footed albatross Phoebastria nigripes and vaquita porpoise Phocoena sinus) as case studies to compare management outcomes of four bycatch mitigation measures: time-area closures, individual bycatch limits, gear modifications and buy-outs. Time-area closures were used for leatherbacks and vaquitas with limited effectiveness, although timing, size and enforcement influenced their efficacy. Individual bycatch limits were employed for leatherbacks in one fishery, sometimes simultaneously with gear modifications and closures. Gear modifications consistently reduced bycatch of leatherbacks and black-footed albatross and showed strong promise for vaquitas. True buy-outs were only used for vaquitas and were costly, most fishers were unwilling to be bought out, and it is unclear if they reduced bycatch. Our review suggests that gear modifications were the most widely used and generally most promising technique for these species, although management outcomes of each strategy depended largely on the species-fishery interaction, fishery characteristics and socioeconomic context. Based on lessons learned from our case studies, we outline when and where a particular approach may be most effective, provide recommendations for improving each strategy and highlight priorities for future research.",
keywords = "Buy-outs, Bycatch limits, Bycatch mitigation, Gear modifications, Marine megafauna, Time-area closures",
author = "J. Senko and White, {E. R.} and Heppell, {S. S.} and Leah Gerber",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1111/acv.12051",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "5--18",
journal = "Animal Conservation",
issn = "1367-9430",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing bycatch mitigation strategies for vulnerable marine megafauna

AU - Senko, J.

AU - White, E. R.

AU - Heppell, S. S.

AU - Gerber, Leah

PY - 2014/2

Y1 - 2014/2

N2 - Marine megafauna such as seabirds, marine mammals and sea turtles are subject to high mortality from incidental capture or bycatch in fisheries. Recent research suggests that fishing effort is increasing worldwide, highlighting the need to evaluate strategies intended to reduce marine megafauna bycatch. Here, we use three focal species (i.e. leatherback turtle Dermochelys coriacea, black-footed albatross Phoebastria nigripes and vaquita porpoise Phocoena sinus) as case studies to compare management outcomes of four bycatch mitigation measures: time-area closures, individual bycatch limits, gear modifications and buy-outs. Time-area closures were used for leatherbacks and vaquitas with limited effectiveness, although timing, size and enforcement influenced their efficacy. Individual bycatch limits were employed for leatherbacks in one fishery, sometimes simultaneously with gear modifications and closures. Gear modifications consistently reduced bycatch of leatherbacks and black-footed albatross and showed strong promise for vaquitas. True buy-outs were only used for vaquitas and were costly, most fishers were unwilling to be bought out, and it is unclear if they reduced bycatch. Our review suggests that gear modifications were the most widely used and generally most promising technique for these species, although management outcomes of each strategy depended largely on the species-fishery interaction, fishery characteristics and socioeconomic context. Based on lessons learned from our case studies, we outline when and where a particular approach may be most effective, provide recommendations for improving each strategy and highlight priorities for future research.

AB - Marine megafauna such as seabirds, marine mammals and sea turtles are subject to high mortality from incidental capture or bycatch in fisheries. Recent research suggests that fishing effort is increasing worldwide, highlighting the need to evaluate strategies intended to reduce marine megafauna bycatch. Here, we use three focal species (i.e. leatherback turtle Dermochelys coriacea, black-footed albatross Phoebastria nigripes and vaquita porpoise Phocoena sinus) as case studies to compare management outcomes of four bycatch mitigation measures: time-area closures, individual bycatch limits, gear modifications and buy-outs. Time-area closures were used for leatherbacks and vaquitas with limited effectiveness, although timing, size and enforcement influenced their efficacy. Individual bycatch limits were employed for leatherbacks in one fishery, sometimes simultaneously with gear modifications and closures. Gear modifications consistently reduced bycatch of leatherbacks and black-footed albatross and showed strong promise for vaquitas. True buy-outs were only used for vaquitas and were costly, most fishers were unwilling to be bought out, and it is unclear if they reduced bycatch. Our review suggests that gear modifications were the most widely used and generally most promising technique for these species, although management outcomes of each strategy depended largely on the species-fishery interaction, fishery characteristics and socioeconomic context. Based on lessons learned from our case studies, we outline when and where a particular approach may be most effective, provide recommendations for improving each strategy and highlight priorities for future research.

KW - Buy-outs

KW - Bycatch limits

KW - Bycatch mitigation

KW - Gear modifications

KW - Marine megafauna

KW - Time-area closures

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892476902&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84892476902&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/acv.12051

DO - 10.1111/acv.12051

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 5

EP - 18

JO - Animal Conservation

JF - Animal Conservation

SN - 1367-9430

IS - 1

ER -