Comparing a Practice-Based Model with a Research-Based Model of social skills interventions for children with autism in schools

Jill Locke, Erin Rotheram-Fuller, Colleen Harker, Connie Kasari, David S. Mandell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Social impairment is the most challenging core deficit for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Several evidence-based interventions address social impairment in children with ASD; however, adoption, use, and implementation of these interventions in schools is challenging. Method: Ninety-two children with ASD who received one of three intervention models: a) School personnel adapted and implemented evidence-based social skills intervention (Practice-Based Model; n = 14); b) University researcher developed and implemented evidence-based social skills intervention (Research-Based Model; n = 45); or c) standard educational practices model (Inclusion Only Model; n = 33) participated. The average age was 8.4 (SD = 1.6) years; majority was male (88%) and white (52.2%). Typically developing classmates completed sociometric ratings to determine children's social network inclusion, and independent raters observed children on the playground using a time-interval behavior coding system to record solitary engagement and frequency of initiations. Results: Separate linear regression models were conducted. Children in the Research-Based Model had significantly higher social network inclusion than children in the other two settings (p =.05). Children in the Practice-Based Model had significantly lower solitary engagement (p =.04) and more initiations on the playground than children in the University Developed Model (p =.04). Conclusions: The results suggest that researchers: 1) may learn from public school stakeholders who have lived experiences to better understand the context in which implementation occurs; and 2) should partner with schools to learn about their processes of adaptation and adoption in order to facilitate successful implementation of evidence-based practices for children with ASD. Interventions designed with implementation in mind may be more feasible and increase the chances of use in schools.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)10-17
Number of pages8
JournalResearch in Autism Spectrum Disorders
Volume62
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2019

Fingerprint

Autistic Disorder
Research
Social Support
Linear Models
Research Personnel
Social Skills
Educational Models
Evidence-Based Practice
Autism Spectrum Disorder

Keywords

  • Autism
  • Implementation
  • Practice-based evidence
  • Social skills interventions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Comparing a Practice-Based Model with a Research-Based Model of social skills interventions for children with autism in schools. / Locke, Jill; Rotheram-Fuller, Erin; Harker, Colleen; Kasari, Connie; Mandell, David S.

In: Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, Vol. 62, 01.06.2019, p. 10-17.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e74435551a9c4131a4075ec9459e58a2,
title = "Comparing a Practice-Based Model with a Research-Based Model of social skills interventions for children with autism in schools",
abstract = "Background: Social impairment is the most challenging core deficit for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Several evidence-based interventions address social impairment in children with ASD; however, adoption, use, and implementation of these interventions in schools is challenging. Method: Ninety-two children with ASD who received one of three intervention models: a) School personnel adapted and implemented evidence-based social skills intervention (Practice-Based Model; n = 14); b) University researcher developed and implemented evidence-based social skills intervention (Research-Based Model; n = 45); or c) standard educational practices model (Inclusion Only Model; n = 33) participated. The average age was 8.4 (SD = 1.6) years; majority was male (88{\%}) and white (52.2{\%}). Typically developing classmates completed sociometric ratings to determine children's social network inclusion, and independent raters observed children on the playground using a time-interval behavior coding system to record solitary engagement and frequency of initiations. Results: Separate linear regression models were conducted. Children in the Research-Based Model had significantly higher social network inclusion than children in the other two settings (p =.05). Children in the Practice-Based Model had significantly lower solitary engagement (p =.04) and more initiations on the playground than children in the University Developed Model (p =.04). Conclusions: The results suggest that researchers: 1) may learn from public school stakeholders who have lived experiences to better understand the context in which implementation occurs; and 2) should partner with schools to learn about their processes of adaptation and adoption in order to facilitate successful implementation of evidence-based practices for children with ASD. Interventions designed with implementation in mind may be more feasible and increase the chances of use in schools.",
keywords = "Autism, Implementation, Practice-based evidence, Social skills interventions",
author = "Jill Locke and Erin Rotheram-Fuller and Colleen Harker and Connie Kasari and Mandell, {David S.}",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.rasd.2019.02.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "62",
pages = "10--17",
journal = "Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders",
issn = "1750-9467",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing a Practice-Based Model with a Research-Based Model of social skills interventions for children with autism in schools

AU - Locke, Jill

AU - Rotheram-Fuller, Erin

AU - Harker, Colleen

AU - Kasari, Connie

AU - Mandell, David S.

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - Background: Social impairment is the most challenging core deficit for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Several evidence-based interventions address social impairment in children with ASD; however, adoption, use, and implementation of these interventions in schools is challenging. Method: Ninety-two children with ASD who received one of three intervention models: a) School personnel adapted and implemented evidence-based social skills intervention (Practice-Based Model; n = 14); b) University researcher developed and implemented evidence-based social skills intervention (Research-Based Model; n = 45); or c) standard educational practices model (Inclusion Only Model; n = 33) participated. The average age was 8.4 (SD = 1.6) years; majority was male (88%) and white (52.2%). Typically developing classmates completed sociometric ratings to determine children's social network inclusion, and independent raters observed children on the playground using a time-interval behavior coding system to record solitary engagement and frequency of initiations. Results: Separate linear regression models were conducted. Children in the Research-Based Model had significantly higher social network inclusion than children in the other two settings (p =.05). Children in the Practice-Based Model had significantly lower solitary engagement (p =.04) and more initiations on the playground than children in the University Developed Model (p =.04). Conclusions: The results suggest that researchers: 1) may learn from public school stakeholders who have lived experiences to better understand the context in which implementation occurs; and 2) should partner with schools to learn about their processes of adaptation and adoption in order to facilitate successful implementation of evidence-based practices for children with ASD. Interventions designed with implementation in mind may be more feasible and increase the chances of use in schools.

AB - Background: Social impairment is the most challenging core deficit for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Several evidence-based interventions address social impairment in children with ASD; however, adoption, use, and implementation of these interventions in schools is challenging. Method: Ninety-two children with ASD who received one of three intervention models: a) School personnel adapted and implemented evidence-based social skills intervention (Practice-Based Model; n = 14); b) University researcher developed and implemented evidence-based social skills intervention (Research-Based Model; n = 45); or c) standard educational practices model (Inclusion Only Model; n = 33) participated. The average age was 8.4 (SD = 1.6) years; majority was male (88%) and white (52.2%). Typically developing classmates completed sociometric ratings to determine children's social network inclusion, and independent raters observed children on the playground using a time-interval behavior coding system to record solitary engagement and frequency of initiations. Results: Separate linear regression models were conducted. Children in the Research-Based Model had significantly higher social network inclusion than children in the other two settings (p =.05). Children in the Practice-Based Model had significantly lower solitary engagement (p =.04) and more initiations on the playground than children in the University Developed Model (p =.04). Conclusions: The results suggest that researchers: 1) may learn from public school stakeholders who have lived experiences to better understand the context in which implementation occurs; and 2) should partner with schools to learn about their processes of adaptation and adoption in order to facilitate successful implementation of evidence-based practices for children with ASD. Interventions designed with implementation in mind may be more feasible and increase the chances of use in schools.

KW - Autism

KW - Implementation

KW - Practice-based evidence

KW - Social skills interventions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061991309&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061991309&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.rasd.2019.02.002

DO - 10.1016/j.rasd.2019.02.002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85061991309

VL - 62

SP - 10

EP - 17

JO - Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders

JF - Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders

SN - 1750-9467

ER -