Comparative Methods for Premodern Cities: Coding for Governance and Class Mobility

Michael Smith, Barbara L. Stark, Wen Ching Chuang, Timothy J. Dennehy, Sharon Harlan, April Kamp-Whittaker, Benjamin W. Stanley, Abigail York

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We describe methods of coding and analyzing historical and archaeological data for comparative analysis of premodern cities. As part of a larger study of spatial access to urban services, we identify eight relevant contextual domains and define variables for each domain. Information from publications on each city is assembled, and the data are coded independently by three scholars and checked for agreement. To date, we have completed contextual coding for 15 cities. Here, we focus on methods to analyze relationships among variables within contextual domains using two example domains—Class Mobility and Governance. Key methodological points involve the problem of missing data, multiple tests with an appropriate correction, and the importance of variation among cases for effective analysis of a domain. Our interpretation of preliminary findings highlights a degree of independence between two different arenas of social life that may relate to collective action. Documentation of our procedures contributes to a growing body of systematic, comparative, cross-cultural analyses of mid-size samples. This study is distinctive in its focus on cities rather than cultures, societies, or polities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)415-451
Number of pages37
JournalCross-Cultural Research
Volume50
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2016

Fingerprint

coding
governance
collective behavior
documentation
Documentation
Sample Size
Publications
interpretation
society
Comparative Method
Premodern
Governance
Contextual

Keywords

  • class mobility
  • coding
  • governance
  • premodern
  • urban history

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anthropology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Comparative Methods for Premodern Cities : Coding for Governance and Class Mobility. / Smith, Michael; Stark, Barbara L.; Chuang, Wen Ching; Dennehy, Timothy J.; Harlan, Sharon; Kamp-Whittaker, April; Stanley, Benjamin W.; York, Abigail.

In: Cross-Cultural Research, Vol. 50, No. 5, 01.12.2016, p. 415-451.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Smith, Michael ; Stark, Barbara L. ; Chuang, Wen Ching ; Dennehy, Timothy J. ; Harlan, Sharon ; Kamp-Whittaker, April ; Stanley, Benjamin W. ; York, Abigail. / Comparative Methods for Premodern Cities : Coding for Governance and Class Mobility. In: Cross-Cultural Research. 2016 ; Vol. 50, No. 5. pp. 415-451.
@article{9a05bc2adfbe4130acac59b36b1d44e3,
title = "Comparative Methods for Premodern Cities: Coding for Governance and Class Mobility",
abstract = "We describe methods of coding and analyzing historical and archaeological data for comparative analysis of premodern cities. As part of a larger study of spatial access to urban services, we identify eight relevant contextual domains and define variables for each domain. Information from publications on each city is assembled, and the data are coded independently by three scholars and checked for agreement. To date, we have completed contextual coding for 15 cities. Here, we focus on methods to analyze relationships among variables within contextual domains using two example domains—Class Mobility and Governance. Key methodological points involve the problem of missing data, multiple tests with an appropriate correction, and the importance of variation among cases for effective analysis of a domain. Our interpretation of preliminary findings highlights a degree of independence between two different arenas of social life that may relate to collective action. Documentation of our procedures contributes to a growing body of systematic, comparative, cross-cultural analyses of mid-size samples. This study is distinctive in its focus on cities rather than cultures, societies, or polities.",
keywords = "class mobility, coding, governance, premodern, urban history",
author = "Michael Smith and Stark, {Barbara L.} and Chuang, {Wen Ching} and Dennehy, {Timothy J.} and Sharon Harlan and April Kamp-Whittaker and Stanley, {Benjamin W.} and Abigail York",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1069397116665824",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "50",
pages = "415--451",
journal = "Cross-Cultural Research",
issn = "1069-3971",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative Methods for Premodern Cities

T2 - Coding for Governance and Class Mobility

AU - Smith, Michael

AU - Stark, Barbara L.

AU - Chuang, Wen Ching

AU - Dennehy, Timothy J.

AU - Harlan, Sharon

AU - Kamp-Whittaker, April

AU - Stanley, Benjamin W.

AU - York, Abigail

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - We describe methods of coding and analyzing historical and archaeological data for comparative analysis of premodern cities. As part of a larger study of spatial access to urban services, we identify eight relevant contextual domains and define variables for each domain. Information from publications on each city is assembled, and the data are coded independently by three scholars and checked for agreement. To date, we have completed contextual coding for 15 cities. Here, we focus on methods to analyze relationships among variables within contextual domains using two example domains—Class Mobility and Governance. Key methodological points involve the problem of missing data, multiple tests with an appropriate correction, and the importance of variation among cases for effective analysis of a domain. Our interpretation of preliminary findings highlights a degree of independence between two different arenas of social life that may relate to collective action. Documentation of our procedures contributes to a growing body of systematic, comparative, cross-cultural analyses of mid-size samples. This study is distinctive in its focus on cities rather than cultures, societies, or polities.

AB - We describe methods of coding and analyzing historical and archaeological data for comparative analysis of premodern cities. As part of a larger study of spatial access to urban services, we identify eight relevant contextual domains and define variables for each domain. Information from publications on each city is assembled, and the data are coded independently by three scholars and checked for agreement. To date, we have completed contextual coding for 15 cities. Here, we focus on methods to analyze relationships among variables within contextual domains using two example domains—Class Mobility and Governance. Key methodological points involve the problem of missing data, multiple tests with an appropriate correction, and the importance of variation among cases for effective analysis of a domain. Our interpretation of preliminary findings highlights a degree of independence between two different arenas of social life that may relate to collective action. Documentation of our procedures contributes to a growing body of systematic, comparative, cross-cultural analyses of mid-size samples. This study is distinctive in its focus on cities rather than cultures, societies, or polities.

KW - class mobility

KW - coding

KW - governance

KW - premodern

KW - urban history

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994153886&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84994153886&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1069397116665824

DO - 10.1177/1069397116665824

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84994153886

VL - 50

SP - 415

EP - 451

JO - Cross-Cultural Research

JF - Cross-Cultural Research

SN - 1069-3971

IS - 5

ER -