Comparative evaluation of the content and structure of communication using two handoff tools: Implications for patient safety

Joanna Abraham, Thomas G. Kannampallil, Khalid F. Almoosa, Bela Patel, Vimla Patel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Handoffs vary in their structure and content, raising concerns regarding standardization. We conducted a comparative evaluation of the nature and patterns of communication on 2 functionally similar but conceptually different handoff tools: Subjective, Objective, Assessment and Plan, based on a patient problem-based format, and Handoff Intervention Tool (HAND-IT), based on a body system-based format. Method: A nonrandomized pre-post prospective intervention study supported by audio recordings and observations of 82 resident handoffs was conducted in a medical intensive care unit. Qualitative analysis was complemented with exploratory sequential pattern analysis techniques to capture the characteristics and types of communication events (CEs) and breakdowns. Results: Use of HAND-IT led to fewer communication breakdowns (F1,80 = 45.66: P < .0001), greater number of CEs (t40 = 4.56; P < .001), with more ideal CEs than Subjective, Objective, Assessment and Plan (t40 = 9.27; P < .001). In addition, the use of HAND-IT was characterized by more request-response CE transitions. Conclusion: The HAND-IT's body system-based structure afforded physicians the ability to better organize and comprehend patient information and led to an interactive and streamlined communication, with limited external input. Our results also emphasize the importance of information organization using a medical knowledge hierarchical format for fostering effective communication.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Critical Care
Volume29
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Patient Safety
Communication
Aptitude
Foster Home Care
Intensive Care Units
Organizations
Prospective Studies
Physicians

Keywords

  • Care continuity
  • Critical care
  • Handovers
  • Information transfer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Comparative evaluation of the content and structure of communication using two handoff tools : Implications for patient safety. / Abraham, Joanna; Kannampallil, Thomas G.; Almoosa, Khalid F.; Patel, Bela; Patel, Vimla.

In: Journal of Critical Care, Vol. 29, No. 2, 01.01.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abraham, Joanna ; Kannampallil, Thomas G. ; Almoosa, Khalid F. ; Patel, Bela ; Patel, Vimla. / Comparative evaluation of the content and structure of communication using two handoff tools : Implications for patient safety. In: Journal of Critical Care. 2014 ; Vol. 29, No. 2.
@article{066e29cdcd32482ea6af8b01c512a6dd,
title = "Comparative evaluation of the content and structure of communication using two handoff tools: Implications for patient safety",
abstract = "Purpose: Handoffs vary in their structure and content, raising concerns regarding standardization. We conducted a comparative evaluation of the nature and patterns of communication on 2 functionally similar but conceptually different handoff tools: Subjective, Objective, Assessment and Plan, based on a patient problem-based format, and Handoff Intervention Tool (HAND-IT), based on a body system-based format. Method: A nonrandomized pre-post prospective intervention study supported by audio recordings and observations of 82 resident handoffs was conducted in a medical intensive care unit. Qualitative analysis was complemented with exploratory sequential pattern analysis techniques to capture the characteristics and types of communication events (CEs) and breakdowns. Results: Use of HAND-IT led to fewer communication breakdowns (F1,80 = 45.66: P < .0001), greater number of CEs (t40 = 4.56; P < .001), with more ideal CEs than Subjective, Objective, Assessment and Plan (t40 = 9.27; P < .001). In addition, the use of HAND-IT was characterized by more request-response CE transitions. Conclusion: The HAND-IT's body system-based structure afforded physicians the ability to better organize and comprehend patient information and led to an interactive and streamlined communication, with limited external input. Our results also emphasize the importance of information organization using a medical knowledge hierarchical format for fostering effective communication.",
keywords = "Care continuity, Critical care, Handovers, Information transfer",
author = "Joanna Abraham and Kannampallil, {Thomas G.} and Almoosa, {Khalid F.} and Bela Patel and Vimla Patel",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.11.014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
journal = "Journal of Critical Care",
issn = "0883-9441",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative evaluation of the content and structure of communication using two handoff tools

T2 - Implications for patient safety

AU - Abraham, Joanna

AU - Kannampallil, Thomas G.

AU - Almoosa, Khalid F.

AU - Patel, Bela

AU - Patel, Vimla

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Purpose: Handoffs vary in their structure and content, raising concerns regarding standardization. We conducted a comparative evaluation of the nature and patterns of communication on 2 functionally similar but conceptually different handoff tools: Subjective, Objective, Assessment and Plan, based on a patient problem-based format, and Handoff Intervention Tool (HAND-IT), based on a body system-based format. Method: A nonrandomized pre-post prospective intervention study supported by audio recordings and observations of 82 resident handoffs was conducted in a medical intensive care unit. Qualitative analysis was complemented with exploratory sequential pattern analysis techniques to capture the characteristics and types of communication events (CEs) and breakdowns. Results: Use of HAND-IT led to fewer communication breakdowns (F1,80 = 45.66: P < .0001), greater number of CEs (t40 = 4.56; P < .001), with more ideal CEs than Subjective, Objective, Assessment and Plan (t40 = 9.27; P < .001). In addition, the use of HAND-IT was characterized by more request-response CE transitions. Conclusion: The HAND-IT's body system-based structure afforded physicians the ability to better organize and comprehend patient information and led to an interactive and streamlined communication, with limited external input. Our results also emphasize the importance of information organization using a medical knowledge hierarchical format for fostering effective communication.

AB - Purpose: Handoffs vary in their structure and content, raising concerns regarding standardization. We conducted a comparative evaluation of the nature and patterns of communication on 2 functionally similar but conceptually different handoff tools: Subjective, Objective, Assessment and Plan, based on a patient problem-based format, and Handoff Intervention Tool (HAND-IT), based on a body system-based format. Method: A nonrandomized pre-post prospective intervention study supported by audio recordings and observations of 82 resident handoffs was conducted in a medical intensive care unit. Qualitative analysis was complemented with exploratory sequential pattern analysis techniques to capture the characteristics and types of communication events (CEs) and breakdowns. Results: Use of HAND-IT led to fewer communication breakdowns (F1,80 = 45.66: P < .0001), greater number of CEs (t40 = 4.56; P < .001), with more ideal CEs than Subjective, Objective, Assessment and Plan (t40 = 9.27; P < .001). In addition, the use of HAND-IT was characterized by more request-response CE transitions. Conclusion: The HAND-IT's body system-based structure afforded physicians the ability to better organize and comprehend patient information and led to an interactive and streamlined communication, with limited external input. Our results also emphasize the importance of information organization using a medical knowledge hierarchical format for fostering effective communication.

KW - Care continuity

KW - Critical care

KW - Handovers

KW - Information transfer

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896740427&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84896740427&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.11.014

DO - 10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.11.014

M3 - Article

C2 - 24360818

AN - SCOPUS:84896740427

VL - 29

JO - Journal of Critical Care

JF - Journal of Critical Care

SN - 0883-9441

IS - 2

ER -