Comparative, collaborative, and integrative risk governance for emerging technologies

Igor Linkov, Benjamin D. Trump, Elke Anklam, David Berube, Patrick Boisseasu, Christopher Cummings, Scott Ferson, Marie Valentine Florin, Bernard Goldstein, Danail Hristozov, Keld Alstrup Jensen, Georgios Katalagarianakis, Jennifer Kuzma, James H. Lambert, Timothy Malloy, Ineke Malsch, Antonio Marcomini, Myriam Merad, José Palma-Oliveira, Edward Perkins & 5 others Ortwin Renn, Thomas Seager, Vicki Stone, Daniel Vallero, Theo Vermeire

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Various emerging technologies challenge existing governance processes to identify, assess, and manage risk. Though the existing risk-based paradigm has been essential for assessment of many chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear technologies, a complementary approach may be warranted for the early-stage assessment and management challenges of high uncertainty technologies ranging from nanotechnology to synthetic biology to artificial intelligence, among many others. This paper argues for a risk governance approach that integrates quantitative experimental information alongside qualitative expert insight to characterize and balance the risks, benefits, costs, and societal implications of emerging technologies. Various articles in scholarly literature have highlighted differing points of how to address technological uncertainty, and this article builds upon such knowledge to explain how an emerging technology risk governance process should be driven by a multi-stakeholder effort, incorporate various disparate sources of information, review various endpoints and outcomes, and comparatively assess emerging technology performance against existing conventional products in a given application area. At least in the early stages of development when quantitative data for risk assessment remain incomplete or limited, such an approach can be valuable for policymakers and decision makers to evaluate the impact that such technologies may have upon human and environmental health.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-7
Number of pages7
JournalEnvironment Systems and Decisions
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - May 4 2018

Fingerprint

governance approach
nanotechnology
artificial intelligence
stakeholder
risk assessment
decision
environmental health
cost-benefit
chemical
product
human health

Keywords

  • Biotechnology
  • Decision analysis
  • Governance
  • Nanotechnology
  • Policy
  • Regulations
  • Risk assessment
  • Synthetic biology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science(all)

Cite this

Linkov, I., Trump, B. D., Anklam, E., Berube, D., Boisseasu, P., Cummings, C., ... Vermeire, T. (Accepted/In press). Comparative, collaborative, and integrative risk governance for emerging technologies. Environment Systems and Decisions, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-018-9686-5

Comparative, collaborative, and integrative risk governance for emerging technologies. / Linkov, Igor; Trump, Benjamin D.; Anklam, Elke; Berube, David; Boisseasu, Patrick; Cummings, Christopher; Ferson, Scott; Florin, Marie Valentine; Goldstein, Bernard; Hristozov, Danail; Jensen, Keld Alstrup; Katalagarianakis, Georgios; Kuzma, Jennifer; Lambert, James H.; Malloy, Timothy; Malsch, Ineke; Marcomini, Antonio; Merad, Myriam; Palma-Oliveira, José; Perkins, Edward; Renn, Ortwin; Seager, Thomas; Stone, Vicki; Vallero, Daniel; Vermeire, Theo.

In: Environment Systems and Decisions, 04.05.2018, p. 1-7.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Linkov, I, Trump, BD, Anklam, E, Berube, D, Boisseasu, P, Cummings, C, Ferson, S, Florin, MV, Goldstein, B, Hristozov, D, Jensen, KA, Katalagarianakis, G, Kuzma, J, Lambert, JH, Malloy, T, Malsch, I, Marcomini, A, Merad, M, Palma-Oliveira, J, Perkins, E, Renn, O, Seager, T, Stone, V, Vallero, D & Vermeire, T 2018, 'Comparative, collaborative, and integrative risk governance for emerging technologies', Environment Systems and Decisions, pp. 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-018-9686-5
Linkov, Igor ; Trump, Benjamin D. ; Anklam, Elke ; Berube, David ; Boisseasu, Patrick ; Cummings, Christopher ; Ferson, Scott ; Florin, Marie Valentine ; Goldstein, Bernard ; Hristozov, Danail ; Jensen, Keld Alstrup ; Katalagarianakis, Georgios ; Kuzma, Jennifer ; Lambert, James H. ; Malloy, Timothy ; Malsch, Ineke ; Marcomini, Antonio ; Merad, Myriam ; Palma-Oliveira, José ; Perkins, Edward ; Renn, Ortwin ; Seager, Thomas ; Stone, Vicki ; Vallero, Daniel ; Vermeire, Theo. / Comparative, collaborative, and integrative risk governance for emerging technologies. In: Environment Systems and Decisions. 2018 ; pp. 1-7.
@article{db902da49f334099b4c22c1461df2b3b,
title = "Comparative, collaborative, and integrative risk governance for emerging technologies",
abstract = "Various emerging technologies challenge existing governance processes to identify, assess, and manage risk. Though the existing risk-based paradigm has been essential for assessment of many chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear technologies, a complementary approach may be warranted for the early-stage assessment and management challenges of high uncertainty technologies ranging from nanotechnology to synthetic biology to artificial intelligence, among many others. This paper argues for a risk governance approach that integrates quantitative experimental information alongside qualitative expert insight to characterize and balance the risks, benefits, costs, and societal implications of emerging technologies. Various articles in scholarly literature have highlighted differing points of how to address technological uncertainty, and this article builds upon such knowledge to explain how an emerging technology risk governance process should be driven by a multi-stakeholder effort, incorporate various disparate sources of information, review various endpoints and outcomes, and comparatively assess emerging technology performance against existing conventional products in a given application area. At least in the early stages of development when quantitative data for risk assessment remain incomplete or limited, such an approach can be valuable for policymakers and decision makers to evaluate the impact that such technologies may have upon human and environmental health.",
keywords = "Biotechnology, Decision analysis, Governance, Nanotechnology, Policy, Regulations, Risk assessment, Synthetic biology",
author = "Igor Linkov and Trump, {Benjamin D.} and Elke Anklam and David Berube and Patrick Boisseasu and Christopher Cummings and Scott Ferson and Florin, {Marie Valentine} and Bernard Goldstein and Danail Hristozov and Jensen, {Keld Alstrup} and Georgios Katalagarianakis and Jennifer Kuzma and Lambert, {James H.} and Timothy Malloy and Ineke Malsch and Antonio Marcomini and Myriam Merad and Jos{\'e} Palma-Oliveira and Edward Perkins and Ortwin Renn and Thomas Seager and Vicki Stone and Daniel Vallero and Theo Vermeire",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1007/s10669-018-9686-5",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--7",
journal = "Environment Systems and Decisions",
issn = "2194-5403",
publisher = "Springer Science + Business Media",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative, collaborative, and integrative risk governance for emerging technologies

AU - Linkov, Igor

AU - Trump, Benjamin D.

AU - Anklam, Elke

AU - Berube, David

AU - Boisseasu, Patrick

AU - Cummings, Christopher

AU - Ferson, Scott

AU - Florin, Marie Valentine

AU - Goldstein, Bernard

AU - Hristozov, Danail

AU - Jensen, Keld Alstrup

AU - Katalagarianakis, Georgios

AU - Kuzma, Jennifer

AU - Lambert, James H.

AU - Malloy, Timothy

AU - Malsch, Ineke

AU - Marcomini, Antonio

AU - Merad, Myriam

AU - Palma-Oliveira, José

AU - Perkins, Edward

AU - Renn, Ortwin

AU - Seager, Thomas

AU - Stone, Vicki

AU - Vallero, Daniel

AU - Vermeire, Theo

PY - 2018/5/4

Y1 - 2018/5/4

N2 - Various emerging technologies challenge existing governance processes to identify, assess, and manage risk. Though the existing risk-based paradigm has been essential for assessment of many chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear technologies, a complementary approach may be warranted for the early-stage assessment and management challenges of high uncertainty technologies ranging from nanotechnology to synthetic biology to artificial intelligence, among many others. This paper argues for a risk governance approach that integrates quantitative experimental information alongside qualitative expert insight to characterize and balance the risks, benefits, costs, and societal implications of emerging technologies. Various articles in scholarly literature have highlighted differing points of how to address technological uncertainty, and this article builds upon such knowledge to explain how an emerging technology risk governance process should be driven by a multi-stakeholder effort, incorporate various disparate sources of information, review various endpoints and outcomes, and comparatively assess emerging technology performance against existing conventional products in a given application area. At least in the early stages of development when quantitative data for risk assessment remain incomplete or limited, such an approach can be valuable for policymakers and decision makers to evaluate the impact that such technologies may have upon human and environmental health.

AB - Various emerging technologies challenge existing governance processes to identify, assess, and manage risk. Though the existing risk-based paradigm has been essential for assessment of many chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear technologies, a complementary approach may be warranted for the early-stage assessment and management challenges of high uncertainty technologies ranging from nanotechnology to synthetic biology to artificial intelligence, among many others. This paper argues for a risk governance approach that integrates quantitative experimental information alongside qualitative expert insight to characterize and balance the risks, benefits, costs, and societal implications of emerging technologies. Various articles in scholarly literature have highlighted differing points of how to address technological uncertainty, and this article builds upon such knowledge to explain how an emerging technology risk governance process should be driven by a multi-stakeholder effort, incorporate various disparate sources of information, review various endpoints and outcomes, and comparatively assess emerging technology performance against existing conventional products in a given application area. At least in the early stages of development when quantitative data for risk assessment remain incomplete or limited, such an approach can be valuable for policymakers and decision makers to evaluate the impact that such technologies may have upon human and environmental health.

KW - Biotechnology

KW - Decision analysis

KW - Governance

KW - Nanotechnology

KW - Policy

KW - Regulations

KW - Risk assessment

KW - Synthetic biology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046489480&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046489480&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10669-018-9686-5

DO - 10.1007/s10669-018-9686-5

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 7

JO - Environment Systems and Decisions

JF - Environment Systems and Decisions

SN - 2194-5403

ER -