Comparability of the Social Skills Rating System to the Social Skills Improvement System

Content and Psychometric Comparisons Across Elementary and Secondary Age Levels

Frank M. Gresham, Stephen Elliott, Michael J. Vance, Clayton R. Cook

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

99 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study compared the Social Skills Rating System (SSRS; Gresham & Elliott, 1990) with the revision of the SSRS, now called the Social Skills Improvement System-Rating Scales (SSIS-RS; Gresham & Elliott, 2008), across three raters (teacher, parent, and student) for elementary- and secondary-aged students. A detailed comparison of these two instruments' comparability has not been previously reported and was considered important because of the frequent use of the SSRS in many externally funded research studies and school districts across the country. Comparisons between the two instruments focused on key reliability and validity estimates across the rating scales for three raters (teacher, parent, and student) using forms for elementary- and secondary-aged students. As hypothesized, the two instruments had high internal consistency estimates and moderately high validity indices for total scores for both social skills and problem behavior scales. The reliability comparisons revealed the SSIS-RS was superior to the SSRS with regard to internal consistency estimates. The validity estimates revealed expected convergent relationships with the strongest relationships consistently found among the various common subscales across all forms of the two instruments. The authors concluded that the SSIS-RS offers researchers and practitioners assessing social behavior of children and youth a broader conceptualization of key social behaviors and psychometrically superior assessment results when using the SSIS-RS over the SSRS. Future research on the SSIS-RS is also identified and contextualized within a multitiered intervention system.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)27-44
Number of pages18
JournalSchool Psychology Quarterly
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2011

Fingerprint

Psychometrics
psychometrics
rating
Students
Social Behavior
rating scale
social behavior
parents
student
Social Problems
teacher
Reproducibility of Results
Research Personnel
district
Social Skills
Research
school

Keywords

  • Comparability
  • Convergent validity
  • SSIS-RS
  • SSRS

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Education

Cite this

Comparability of the Social Skills Rating System to the Social Skills Improvement System : Content and Psychometric Comparisons Across Elementary and Secondary Age Levels. / Gresham, Frank M.; Elliott, Stephen; Vance, Michael J.; Cook, Clayton R.

In: School Psychology Quarterly, Vol. 26, No. 1, 03.2011, p. 27-44.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a01f71ea5bfe4c9785a6ea6f0a375fc0,
title = "Comparability of the Social Skills Rating System to the Social Skills Improvement System: Content and Psychometric Comparisons Across Elementary and Secondary Age Levels",
abstract = "This study compared the Social Skills Rating System (SSRS; Gresham & Elliott, 1990) with the revision of the SSRS, now called the Social Skills Improvement System-Rating Scales (SSIS-RS; Gresham & Elliott, 2008), across three raters (teacher, parent, and student) for elementary- and secondary-aged students. A detailed comparison of these two instruments' comparability has not been previously reported and was considered important because of the frequent use of the SSRS in many externally funded research studies and school districts across the country. Comparisons between the two instruments focused on key reliability and validity estimates across the rating scales for three raters (teacher, parent, and student) using forms for elementary- and secondary-aged students. As hypothesized, the two instruments had high internal consistency estimates and moderately high validity indices for total scores for both social skills and problem behavior scales. The reliability comparisons revealed the SSIS-RS was superior to the SSRS with regard to internal consistency estimates. The validity estimates revealed expected convergent relationships with the strongest relationships consistently found among the various common subscales across all forms of the two instruments. The authors concluded that the SSIS-RS offers researchers and practitioners assessing social behavior of children and youth a broader conceptualization of key social behaviors and psychometrically superior assessment results when using the SSIS-RS over the SSRS. Future research on the SSIS-RS is also identified and contextualized within a multitiered intervention system.",
keywords = "Comparability, Convergent validity, SSIS-RS, SSRS",
author = "Gresham, {Frank M.} and Stephen Elliott and Vance, {Michael J.} and Cook, {Clayton R.}",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1037/a0022662",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "27--44",
journal = "School Psychology",
issn = "2578-4218",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparability of the Social Skills Rating System to the Social Skills Improvement System

T2 - Content and Psychometric Comparisons Across Elementary and Secondary Age Levels

AU - Gresham, Frank M.

AU - Elliott, Stephen

AU - Vance, Michael J.

AU - Cook, Clayton R.

PY - 2011/3

Y1 - 2011/3

N2 - This study compared the Social Skills Rating System (SSRS; Gresham & Elliott, 1990) with the revision of the SSRS, now called the Social Skills Improvement System-Rating Scales (SSIS-RS; Gresham & Elliott, 2008), across three raters (teacher, parent, and student) for elementary- and secondary-aged students. A detailed comparison of these two instruments' comparability has not been previously reported and was considered important because of the frequent use of the SSRS in many externally funded research studies and school districts across the country. Comparisons between the two instruments focused on key reliability and validity estimates across the rating scales for three raters (teacher, parent, and student) using forms for elementary- and secondary-aged students. As hypothesized, the two instruments had high internal consistency estimates and moderately high validity indices for total scores for both social skills and problem behavior scales. The reliability comparisons revealed the SSIS-RS was superior to the SSRS with regard to internal consistency estimates. The validity estimates revealed expected convergent relationships with the strongest relationships consistently found among the various common subscales across all forms of the two instruments. The authors concluded that the SSIS-RS offers researchers and practitioners assessing social behavior of children and youth a broader conceptualization of key social behaviors and psychometrically superior assessment results when using the SSIS-RS over the SSRS. Future research on the SSIS-RS is also identified and contextualized within a multitiered intervention system.

AB - This study compared the Social Skills Rating System (SSRS; Gresham & Elliott, 1990) with the revision of the SSRS, now called the Social Skills Improvement System-Rating Scales (SSIS-RS; Gresham & Elliott, 2008), across three raters (teacher, parent, and student) for elementary- and secondary-aged students. A detailed comparison of these two instruments' comparability has not been previously reported and was considered important because of the frequent use of the SSRS in many externally funded research studies and school districts across the country. Comparisons between the two instruments focused on key reliability and validity estimates across the rating scales for three raters (teacher, parent, and student) using forms for elementary- and secondary-aged students. As hypothesized, the two instruments had high internal consistency estimates and moderately high validity indices for total scores for both social skills and problem behavior scales. The reliability comparisons revealed the SSIS-RS was superior to the SSRS with regard to internal consistency estimates. The validity estimates revealed expected convergent relationships with the strongest relationships consistently found among the various common subscales across all forms of the two instruments. The authors concluded that the SSIS-RS offers researchers and practitioners assessing social behavior of children and youth a broader conceptualization of key social behaviors and psychometrically superior assessment results when using the SSIS-RS over the SSRS. Future research on the SSIS-RS is also identified and contextualized within a multitiered intervention system.

KW - Comparability

KW - Convergent validity

KW - SSIS-RS

KW - SSRS

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952995748&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952995748&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0022662

DO - 10.1037/a0022662

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 27

EP - 44

JO - School Psychology

JF - School Psychology

SN - 2578-4218

IS - 1

ER -