Community hygiene norm violators are consistently stigmatized: Evidence from four global sites and implications for sanitation interventions

Alexandra Slade, Amber Wutich, Margaret V. du Bray, Jonathan Maupin, Roseanne C. Schuster, Matthew M. Gervais

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Community sanitation interventions increasingly leverage presumed innate human disgust emotions and desire for social acceptance to change hygiene norms. While often effective at reducing open defecation and encouraging handwashing, there are growing indications from ethnographic studies that this strategy might create collateral damage, such as reinforcing stigmatized identities in ways that can drive social or economic marginalization. To test fundamental ethnographic propositions regarding the connections between hygiene norm violations and stigmatized social identities, we conducted 267 interviews in four distinct global sites (in Guatemala, Fiji, New Zealand, USA) between May 2015 and March 2016. Based on 148 initial codes applied to 23,278 interview segments, text-based analyses show that stigmatizing labels and other indices of contempt readily and immediately attach to imagined hygiene violators in these diverse social settings. Moral concerns are much more salient at all sites than disease/contagion ones, and hygiene violators are extended little empathy. Contrary to statistical predictions, however, non-empathetic moral reactions to women hygiene violators are no harsher than those of male violators. This improved evidentiary base illuminates why disgust- and shame-based sanitation interventions can so easily create unintended social damage: hygiene norm violations and stigmatizing social devaluations are consistently cognitively connected.

LanguageEnglish (US)
Pages12-21
Number of pages10
JournalSocial Science and Medicine
Volume220
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Sanitation
hygiene
Hygiene
norm violation
community
evidence
damages
Fiji
Interviews
Guatemala
Social Distance
Hand Disinfection
Shame
Social Identification
Defecation
devaluation
Melanesia
shame
interview
New Zealand

Keywords

  • Behavior change
  • Community-Led Total Sanitation
  • Culture
  • Hygiene
  • Intervention
  • Norms
  • Sanitation
  • Stigma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

Community hygiene norm violators are consistently stigmatized : Evidence from four global sites and implications for sanitation interventions. / Slade, Alexandra; Wutich, Amber; du Bray, Margaret V.; Maupin, Jonathan; Schuster, Roseanne C.; Gervais, Matthew M.

In: Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 220, 01.01.2019, p. 12-21.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3a85c11169584eb6bee42d569baae964,
title = "Community hygiene norm violators are consistently stigmatized: Evidence from four global sites and implications for sanitation interventions",
abstract = "Community sanitation interventions increasingly leverage presumed innate human disgust emotions and desire for social acceptance to change hygiene norms. While often effective at reducing open defecation and encouraging handwashing, there are growing indications from ethnographic studies that this strategy might create collateral damage, such as reinforcing stigmatized identities in ways that can drive social or economic marginalization. To test fundamental ethnographic propositions regarding the connections between hygiene norm violations and stigmatized social identities, we conducted 267 interviews in four distinct global sites (in Guatemala, Fiji, New Zealand, USA) between May 2015 and March 2016. Based on 148 initial codes applied to 23,278 interview segments, text-based analyses show that stigmatizing labels and other indices of contempt readily and immediately attach to imagined hygiene violators in these diverse social settings. Moral concerns are much more salient at all sites than disease/contagion ones, and hygiene violators are extended little empathy. Contrary to statistical predictions, however, non-empathetic moral reactions to women hygiene violators are no harsher than those of male violators. This improved evidentiary base illuminates why disgust- and shame-based sanitation interventions can so easily create unintended social damage: hygiene norm violations and stigmatizing social devaluations are consistently cognitively connected.",
keywords = "Behavior change, Community-Led Total Sanitation, Culture, Hygiene, Intervention, Norms, Sanitation, Stigma",
author = "Alexandra Slade and Amber Wutich and {du Bray}, {Margaret V.} and Jonathan Maupin and Schuster, {Roseanne C.} and Gervais, {Matthew M.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.10.020",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "220",
pages = "12--21",
journal = "Social Science and Medicine",
issn = "0277-9536",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Community hygiene norm violators are consistently stigmatized

T2 - Social Science and Medicine

AU - Slade, Alexandra

AU - Wutich, Amber

AU - du Bray, Margaret V.

AU - Maupin, Jonathan

AU - Schuster, Roseanne C.

AU - Gervais, Matthew M.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Community sanitation interventions increasingly leverage presumed innate human disgust emotions and desire for social acceptance to change hygiene norms. While often effective at reducing open defecation and encouraging handwashing, there are growing indications from ethnographic studies that this strategy might create collateral damage, such as reinforcing stigmatized identities in ways that can drive social or economic marginalization. To test fundamental ethnographic propositions regarding the connections between hygiene norm violations and stigmatized social identities, we conducted 267 interviews in four distinct global sites (in Guatemala, Fiji, New Zealand, USA) between May 2015 and March 2016. Based on 148 initial codes applied to 23,278 interview segments, text-based analyses show that stigmatizing labels and other indices of contempt readily and immediately attach to imagined hygiene violators in these diverse social settings. Moral concerns are much more salient at all sites than disease/contagion ones, and hygiene violators are extended little empathy. Contrary to statistical predictions, however, non-empathetic moral reactions to women hygiene violators are no harsher than those of male violators. This improved evidentiary base illuminates why disgust- and shame-based sanitation interventions can so easily create unintended social damage: hygiene norm violations and stigmatizing social devaluations are consistently cognitively connected.

AB - Community sanitation interventions increasingly leverage presumed innate human disgust emotions and desire for social acceptance to change hygiene norms. While often effective at reducing open defecation and encouraging handwashing, there are growing indications from ethnographic studies that this strategy might create collateral damage, such as reinforcing stigmatized identities in ways that can drive social or economic marginalization. To test fundamental ethnographic propositions regarding the connections between hygiene norm violations and stigmatized social identities, we conducted 267 interviews in four distinct global sites (in Guatemala, Fiji, New Zealand, USA) between May 2015 and March 2016. Based on 148 initial codes applied to 23,278 interview segments, text-based analyses show that stigmatizing labels and other indices of contempt readily and immediately attach to imagined hygiene violators in these diverse social settings. Moral concerns are much more salient at all sites than disease/contagion ones, and hygiene violators are extended little empathy. Contrary to statistical predictions, however, non-empathetic moral reactions to women hygiene violators are no harsher than those of male violators. This improved evidentiary base illuminates why disgust- and shame-based sanitation interventions can so easily create unintended social damage: hygiene norm violations and stigmatizing social devaluations are consistently cognitively connected.

KW - Behavior change

KW - Community-Led Total Sanitation

KW - Culture

KW - Hygiene

KW - Intervention

KW - Norms

KW - Sanitation

KW - Stigma

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055750367&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055750367&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.10.020

DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.10.020

M3 - Article

VL - 220

SP - 12

EP - 21

JO - Social Science and Medicine

JF - Social Science and Medicine

SN - 0277-9536

ER -