Communication and eschatology: The work of waiting, an ethics of relief, and areligious religiosity

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article begins from an understanding of critical theory as being in need of something. The arguments made here develop a series of related concepts - the work of waiting, an ethics of relief, and areligious religiosity - that begin to address this need at the heart of critical theory. Built around a series of philosophical circumscriptions that sketch the outlines of these concepts, I argue that to participate in the radical continuation of the Enlightenment we need to return to an unlikely place - religion. To achieve this return, I offer an explication of Heidegger's address, The Principle of Reason (1996), focusing on his discussion of calculative reason, and Freud's Future of an Illusion (1961). This gives the vital context for understanding the various meanings comported by the metaphor of an ethics of relief . In light of this, I demonstrate that there is a space reserved for these ideas within contemporary critical theory as represented by the discourse ethics of Habermas. By intersecting the position I develop with two points in Habermas's work, I show that the concepts of the work of waiting, an ethics of relief, and areligious religiosity can begin a response to the need identified at the heart of critical theory.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)343-361
Number of pages19
JournalCommunication Theory
Volume7
Issue number4
StatePublished - Nov 1997

Fingerprint

eschatology
critical theory
moral philosophy
communication
Communication
metaphor
Religion
Critical Theory
Relief
Religiosity
Eschatology
discourse

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication

Cite this

Communication and eschatology : The work of waiting, an ethics of relief, and areligious religiosity. / Ramsey, Ramsey.

In: Communication Theory, Vol. 7, No. 4, 11.1997, p. 343-361.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f8429d6606b243c79059d1a5b4cfd7cb,
title = "Communication and eschatology: The work of waiting, an ethics of relief, and areligious religiosity",
abstract = "This article begins from an understanding of critical theory as being in need of something. The arguments made here develop a series of related concepts - the work of waiting, an ethics of relief, and areligious religiosity - that begin to address this need at the heart of critical theory. Built around a series of philosophical circumscriptions that sketch the outlines of these concepts, I argue that to participate in the radical continuation of the Enlightenment we need to return to an unlikely place - religion. To achieve this return, I offer an explication of Heidegger's address, The Principle of Reason (1996), focusing on his discussion of calculative reason, and Freud's Future of an Illusion (1961). This gives the vital context for understanding the various meanings comported by the metaphor of an ethics of relief . In light of this, I demonstrate that there is a space reserved for these ideas within contemporary critical theory as represented by the discourse ethics of Habermas. By intersecting the position I develop with two points in Habermas's work, I show that the concepts of the work of waiting, an ethics of relief, and areligious religiosity can begin a response to the need identified at the heart of critical theory.",
author = "Ramsey Ramsey",
year = "1997",
month = "11",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "343--361",
journal = "Communication Theory",
issn = "1050-3293",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Communication and eschatology

T2 - The work of waiting, an ethics of relief, and areligious religiosity

AU - Ramsey, Ramsey

PY - 1997/11

Y1 - 1997/11

N2 - This article begins from an understanding of critical theory as being in need of something. The arguments made here develop a series of related concepts - the work of waiting, an ethics of relief, and areligious religiosity - that begin to address this need at the heart of critical theory. Built around a series of philosophical circumscriptions that sketch the outlines of these concepts, I argue that to participate in the radical continuation of the Enlightenment we need to return to an unlikely place - religion. To achieve this return, I offer an explication of Heidegger's address, The Principle of Reason (1996), focusing on his discussion of calculative reason, and Freud's Future of an Illusion (1961). This gives the vital context for understanding the various meanings comported by the metaphor of an ethics of relief . In light of this, I demonstrate that there is a space reserved for these ideas within contemporary critical theory as represented by the discourse ethics of Habermas. By intersecting the position I develop with two points in Habermas's work, I show that the concepts of the work of waiting, an ethics of relief, and areligious religiosity can begin a response to the need identified at the heart of critical theory.

AB - This article begins from an understanding of critical theory as being in need of something. The arguments made here develop a series of related concepts - the work of waiting, an ethics of relief, and areligious religiosity - that begin to address this need at the heart of critical theory. Built around a series of philosophical circumscriptions that sketch the outlines of these concepts, I argue that to participate in the radical continuation of the Enlightenment we need to return to an unlikely place - religion. To achieve this return, I offer an explication of Heidegger's address, The Principle of Reason (1996), focusing on his discussion of calculative reason, and Freud's Future of an Illusion (1961). This gives the vital context for understanding the various meanings comported by the metaphor of an ethics of relief . In light of this, I demonstrate that there is a space reserved for these ideas within contemporary critical theory as represented by the discourse ethics of Habermas. By intersecting the position I develop with two points in Habermas's work, I show that the concepts of the work of waiting, an ethics of relief, and areligious religiosity can begin a response to the need identified at the heart of critical theory.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031260715&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031260715&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0031260715

VL - 7

SP - 343

EP - 361

JO - Communication Theory

JF - Communication Theory

SN - 1050-3293

IS - 4

ER -