Communicating bad news

Insights for the design of consumer health technologies

Eun Kyoung Choe, Marisa Duarte, Hyewon Suh, Wanda Pratt, Julie A. Kientz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: As people increasingly receive personal health information through technology, there is increased importance for this information to be communicated with empathy and consideration for the patient's experience of consuming it. Although technology enables people to have more frequent and faster access to their health information, it could also cause unnecessary anxiety, distress, or confusion because of the sensitive and complex nature of the information and its potential to provide information that could be considered bad news. Objective: The aim of this study was to uncover insights for the design of health information technologies that potentially communicate bad news about health such as the result of a diagnosis, increased risk for a chronic or terminal disease, or overall declining health. Methods: On the basis of a review of established guidelines for clinicians on communicating bad news, we developed an interview guide and conducted interviews with patients, patients' family members, and clinicians on their experience of delivering and receiving the diagnosis of a serious disease. We then analyzed the data using a thematic analysis to identify overall themes from a perspective of identifying ways to translate these strategies to technology design. Results: We describe qualitative results combining an analysis of the clinical guidelines for sharing bad health news with patients and interviews on clinicians' specific strategies to communicate bad news and the emotional and informational support that patients and their family members seek. Specific strategies clinicians use included preparing for the patients' visit, anticipating patients' feelings, building a partnership of trust with patients, acknowledging patients' physical and emotional discomfort, setting up a scene where patients can process the information, helping patients build resilience and giving hope, matching the level of information to the patients' level of understanding, communicating face-to-face, if possible, and using nonverbal means. Patient and family member experiences included internal turmoil and emotional distress when receiving bad news and emotional and informational support that patients and family members seek. Conclusions: The results from this study identify specific strategies for health information technologies to better promote empathic communication when they communicate concerning health news. We distill the findings from our study into design hypotheses for ways technologies may be able to help people better cope with the possibility of receiving bad health news, including tailoring the delivery of information to the patients' individual preferences, supporting interfaces for sharing patients' context, mitigating emotional stress from self-monitoring data, and identifying clear, actionable steps patients can take next.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere8885
JournalJournal of medical Internet research
Volume21
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2019

Fingerprint

Biomedical Technology
Medical Informatics
Health
Interviews
Technology
Hope
Personal Health Records
Guidelines
Confusion
Patient Preference
Psychological Stress

Keywords

  • eHealth
  • Empathy
  • Health communication
  • mHealth
  • Mobile health
  • Patient-centered care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics

Cite this

Communicating bad news : Insights for the design of consumer health technologies. / Choe, Eun Kyoung; Duarte, Marisa; Suh, Hyewon; Pratt, Wanda; Kientz, Julie A.

In: Journal of medical Internet research, Vol. 21, No. 5, e8885, 01.05.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Choe, Eun Kyoung ; Duarte, Marisa ; Suh, Hyewon ; Pratt, Wanda ; Kientz, Julie A. / Communicating bad news : Insights for the design of consumer health technologies. In: Journal of medical Internet research. 2019 ; Vol. 21, No. 5.
@article{6405417e5bc04a048ad8852dd3436907,
title = "Communicating bad news: Insights for the design of consumer health technologies",
abstract = "Background: As people increasingly receive personal health information through technology, there is increased importance for this information to be communicated with empathy and consideration for the patient's experience of consuming it. Although technology enables people to have more frequent and faster access to their health information, it could also cause unnecessary anxiety, distress, or confusion because of the sensitive and complex nature of the information and its potential to provide information that could be considered bad news. Objective: The aim of this study was to uncover insights for the design of health information technologies that potentially communicate bad news about health such as the result of a diagnosis, increased risk for a chronic or terminal disease, or overall declining health. Methods: On the basis of a review of established guidelines for clinicians on communicating bad news, we developed an interview guide and conducted interviews with patients, patients' family members, and clinicians on their experience of delivering and receiving the diagnosis of a serious disease. We then analyzed the data using a thematic analysis to identify overall themes from a perspective of identifying ways to translate these strategies to technology design. Results: We describe qualitative results combining an analysis of the clinical guidelines for sharing bad health news with patients and interviews on clinicians' specific strategies to communicate bad news and the emotional and informational support that patients and their family members seek. Specific strategies clinicians use included preparing for the patients' visit, anticipating patients' feelings, building a partnership of trust with patients, acknowledging patients' physical and emotional discomfort, setting up a scene where patients can process the information, helping patients build resilience and giving hope, matching the level of information to the patients' level of understanding, communicating face-to-face, if possible, and using nonverbal means. Patient and family member experiences included internal turmoil and emotional distress when receiving bad news and emotional and informational support that patients and family members seek. Conclusions: The results from this study identify specific strategies for health information technologies to better promote empathic communication when they communicate concerning health news. We distill the findings from our study into design hypotheses for ways technologies may be able to help people better cope with the possibility of receiving bad health news, including tailoring the delivery of information to the patients' individual preferences, supporting interfaces for sharing patients' context, mitigating emotional stress from self-monitoring data, and identifying clear, actionable steps patients can take next.",
keywords = "eHealth, Empathy, Health communication, mHealth, Mobile health, Patient-centered care",
author = "Choe, {Eun Kyoung} and Marisa Duarte and Hyewon Suh and Wanda Pratt and Kientz, {Julie A.}",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2196/humanfactors.8885",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
journal = "Journal of Medical Internet Research",
issn = "1439-4456",
publisher = "Journal of medical Internet Research",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Communicating bad news

T2 - Insights for the design of consumer health technologies

AU - Choe, Eun Kyoung

AU - Duarte, Marisa

AU - Suh, Hyewon

AU - Pratt, Wanda

AU - Kientz, Julie A.

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

N2 - Background: As people increasingly receive personal health information through technology, there is increased importance for this information to be communicated with empathy and consideration for the patient's experience of consuming it. Although technology enables people to have more frequent and faster access to their health information, it could also cause unnecessary anxiety, distress, or confusion because of the sensitive and complex nature of the information and its potential to provide information that could be considered bad news. Objective: The aim of this study was to uncover insights for the design of health information technologies that potentially communicate bad news about health such as the result of a diagnosis, increased risk for a chronic or terminal disease, or overall declining health. Methods: On the basis of a review of established guidelines for clinicians on communicating bad news, we developed an interview guide and conducted interviews with patients, patients' family members, and clinicians on their experience of delivering and receiving the diagnosis of a serious disease. We then analyzed the data using a thematic analysis to identify overall themes from a perspective of identifying ways to translate these strategies to technology design. Results: We describe qualitative results combining an analysis of the clinical guidelines for sharing bad health news with patients and interviews on clinicians' specific strategies to communicate bad news and the emotional and informational support that patients and their family members seek. Specific strategies clinicians use included preparing for the patients' visit, anticipating patients' feelings, building a partnership of trust with patients, acknowledging patients' physical and emotional discomfort, setting up a scene where patients can process the information, helping patients build resilience and giving hope, matching the level of information to the patients' level of understanding, communicating face-to-face, if possible, and using nonverbal means. Patient and family member experiences included internal turmoil and emotional distress when receiving bad news and emotional and informational support that patients and family members seek. Conclusions: The results from this study identify specific strategies for health information technologies to better promote empathic communication when they communicate concerning health news. We distill the findings from our study into design hypotheses for ways technologies may be able to help people better cope with the possibility of receiving bad health news, including tailoring the delivery of information to the patients' individual preferences, supporting interfaces for sharing patients' context, mitigating emotional stress from self-monitoring data, and identifying clear, actionable steps patients can take next.

AB - Background: As people increasingly receive personal health information through technology, there is increased importance for this information to be communicated with empathy and consideration for the patient's experience of consuming it. Although technology enables people to have more frequent and faster access to their health information, it could also cause unnecessary anxiety, distress, or confusion because of the sensitive and complex nature of the information and its potential to provide information that could be considered bad news. Objective: The aim of this study was to uncover insights for the design of health information technologies that potentially communicate bad news about health such as the result of a diagnosis, increased risk for a chronic or terminal disease, or overall declining health. Methods: On the basis of a review of established guidelines for clinicians on communicating bad news, we developed an interview guide and conducted interviews with patients, patients' family members, and clinicians on their experience of delivering and receiving the diagnosis of a serious disease. We then analyzed the data using a thematic analysis to identify overall themes from a perspective of identifying ways to translate these strategies to technology design. Results: We describe qualitative results combining an analysis of the clinical guidelines for sharing bad health news with patients and interviews on clinicians' specific strategies to communicate bad news and the emotional and informational support that patients and their family members seek. Specific strategies clinicians use included preparing for the patients' visit, anticipating patients' feelings, building a partnership of trust with patients, acknowledging patients' physical and emotional discomfort, setting up a scene where patients can process the information, helping patients build resilience and giving hope, matching the level of information to the patients' level of understanding, communicating face-to-face, if possible, and using nonverbal means. Patient and family member experiences included internal turmoil and emotional distress when receiving bad news and emotional and informational support that patients and family members seek. Conclusions: The results from this study identify specific strategies for health information technologies to better promote empathic communication when they communicate concerning health news. We distill the findings from our study into design hypotheses for ways technologies may be able to help people better cope with the possibility of receiving bad health news, including tailoring the delivery of information to the patients' individual preferences, supporting interfaces for sharing patients' context, mitigating emotional stress from self-monitoring data, and identifying clear, actionable steps patients can take next.

KW - eHealth

KW - Empathy

KW - Health communication

KW - mHealth

KW - Mobile health

KW - Patient-centered care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067383282&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067383282&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2196/humanfactors.8885

DO - 10.2196/humanfactors.8885

M3 - Article

VL - 21

JO - Journal of Medical Internet Research

JF - Journal of Medical Internet Research

SN - 1439-4456

IS - 5

M1 - e8885

ER -