Combining Motivational and Physical Intervention Components to Promote Fall-Reducing Physical Activity Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Feasibility Study

Siobhan Kathleen McMahon, Jean F. Wyman, Michael J. Belyea, Nelma Shearer, Eric B. Hekler, Julie Fleury

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of a new intervention, Ready~Steady, in terms of demand, acceptability, implementation, and limited efficacy.

DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial; repeated measures.

SETTING: Two rural communities in Itasca County, Minnesota.

SUBJECTS: Thirty participants were randomized to an intervention (n = 16) or attention-control (n = 14) group.

INTERVENTION: Ready~Steady combined two components: (1) motivational (motivational support, social network support, empowering education), and (2) fall-reducing physical activities (PAs; guidance to practice leg-strengthening, balance, and flexibility activities and walking).

MEASURES: Acceptability questionnaire and Indices of Procedural Consistency (investigator developed), Community Health Activity Model Program for Seniors Questionnaire (confirmed with accelerometry), Short Physical Performance Battery, Perceived Environmental Support Scale, Social Support for Exercise Questionnaire, Goal Attainment Scale, Index of Readiness, and Index of Self-Regulation.

ANALYSIS: Descriptive statistics and a marginal approach to repeated-measures analysis of variance, using mixed-model procedures.

RESULTS: Attrition was 7% and mean attendance was 7.2 of 8 sessions, participants evaluated Ready~Steady as acceptable, and implementation fidelity was good. The intervention group improved significantly more than the attention-control group in PA behavior, F1,27 = 11.92, p = .002; fall risk (functional balance and strength), F1,27 = 14.89, p = .001; support for exercise from friends, F1,27 = 11.44, p = .002; and self-regulation, F1,26 = 38.82, p < .005.

CONCLUSION: The Ready~Steady intervention was feasible as evidenced by low attrition and good attendance and implementation, as well as positive effects on targeted outcomes and theoretical mechanisms of change.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)638-644
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican journal of health promotion : AJHP
Volume30
Issue number8
StatePublished - Nov 1 2016

Fingerprint

Independent Living
Feasibility Studies
Exercise
Social Support
self-regulation
Accelerometry
community
questionnaire
Rural Population
goal attainment
Walking
Group
Leg
Analysis of Variance
Randomized Controlled Trials
descriptive statistics
analysis of variance
Research Personnel
rural community
Education

Keywords

  • Accidental Falls, Physical Activity, Motivation, Wellness Programs, Intervention Studies, Prevention Research. Manuscript format: research, quantitative evaluation
  • Health focus: physical activity, fall prevention
  • Outcome measure: physical activity behavior
  • Research purpose: feasibility study
  • Setting: rural communities
  • Strategy: skill building/behavioral change
  • Study design: randomized controlled trial
  • Target population age: seniors
  • Target population circumstances: community-dwelling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Combining Motivational and Physical Intervention Components to Promote Fall-Reducing Physical Activity Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults : A Feasibility Study. / McMahon, Siobhan Kathleen; Wyman, Jean F.; Belyea, Michael J.; Shearer, Nelma; Hekler, Eric B.; Fleury, Julie.

In: American journal of health promotion : AJHP, Vol. 30, No. 8, 01.11.2016, p. 638-644.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f808cfc7ea9d435a9a36816037ec0e4d,
title = "Combining Motivational and Physical Intervention Components to Promote Fall-Reducing Physical Activity Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Feasibility Study",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of a new intervention, Ready~Steady, in terms of demand, acceptability, implementation, and limited efficacy.DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial; repeated measures.SETTING: Two rural communities in Itasca County, Minnesota.SUBJECTS: Thirty participants were randomized to an intervention (n = 16) or attention-control (n = 14) group.INTERVENTION: Ready~Steady combined two components: (1) motivational (motivational support, social network support, empowering education), and (2) fall-reducing physical activities (PAs; guidance to practice leg-strengthening, balance, and flexibility activities and walking).MEASURES: Acceptability questionnaire and Indices of Procedural Consistency (investigator developed), Community Health Activity Model Program for Seniors Questionnaire (confirmed with accelerometry), Short Physical Performance Battery, Perceived Environmental Support Scale, Social Support for Exercise Questionnaire, Goal Attainment Scale, Index of Readiness, and Index of Self-Regulation.ANALYSIS: Descriptive statistics and a marginal approach to repeated-measures analysis of variance, using mixed-model procedures.RESULTS: Attrition was 7{\%} and mean attendance was 7.2 of 8 sessions, participants evaluated Ready~Steady as acceptable, and implementation fidelity was good. The intervention group improved significantly more than the attention-control group in PA behavior, F1,27 = 11.92, p = .002; fall risk (functional balance and strength), F1,27 = 14.89, p = .001; support for exercise from friends, F1,27 = 11.44, p = .002; and self-regulation, F1,26 = 38.82, p < .005.CONCLUSION: The Ready~Steady intervention was feasible as evidenced by low attrition and good attendance and implementation, as well as positive effects on targeted outcomes and theoretical mechanisms of change.",
keywords = "Accidental Falls, Physical Activity, Motivation, Wellness Programs, Intervention Studies, Prevention Research. Manuscript format: research, quantitative evaluation, Health focus: physical activity, fall prevention, Outcome measure: physical activity behavior, Research purpose: feasibility study, Setting: rural communities, Strategy: skill building/behavioral change, Study design: randomized controlled trial, Target population age: seniors, Target population circumstances: community-dwelling",
author = "McMahon, {Siobhan Kathleen} and Wyman, {Jean F.} and Belyea, {Michael J.} and Nelma Shearer and Hekler, {Eric B.} and Julie Fleury",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "638--644",
journal = "American Journal of Health Promotion",
issn = "0890-1171",
publisher = "American Journal of Health Promotion",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Combining Motivational and Physical Intervention Components to Promote Fall-Reducing Physical Activity Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults

T2 - A Feasibility Study

AU - McMahon, Siobhan Kathleen

AU - Wyman, Jean F.

AU - Belyea, Michael J.

AU - Shearer, Nelma

AU - Hekler, Eric B.

AU - Fleury, Julie

PY - 2016/11/1

Y1 - 2016/11/1

N2 - PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of a new intervention, Ready~Steady, in terms of demand, acceptability, implementation, and limited efficacy.DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial; repeated measures.SETTING: Two rural communities in Itasca County, Minnesota.SUBJECTS: Thirty participants were randomized to an intervention (n = 16) or attention-control (n = 14) group.INTERVENTION: Ready~Steady combined two components: (1) motivational (motivational support, social network support, empowering education), and (2) fall-reducing physical activities (PAs; guidance to practice leg-strengthening, balance, and flexibility activities and walking).MEASURES: Acceptability questionnaire and Indices of Procedural Consistency (investigator developed), Community Health Activity Model Program for Seniors Questionnaire (confirmed with accelerometry), Short Physical Performance Battery, Perceived Environmental Support Scale, Social Support for Exercise Questionnaire, Goal Attainment Scale, Index of Readiness, and Index of Self-Regulation.ANALYSIS: Descriptive statistics and a marginal approach to repeated-measures analysis of variance, using mixed-model procedures.RESULTS: Attrition was 7% and mean attendance was 7.2 of 8 sessions, participants evaluated Ready~Steady as acceptable, and implementation fidelity was good. The intervention group improved significantly more than the attention-control group in PA behavior, F1,27 = 11.92, p = .002; fall risk (functional balance and strength), F1,27 = 14.89, p = .001; support for exercise from friends, F1,27 = 11.44, p = .002; and self-regulation, F1,26 = 38.82, p < .005.CONCLUSION: The Ready~Steady intervention was feasible as evidenced by low attrition and good attendance and implementation, as well as positive effects on targeted outcomes and theoretical mechanisms of change.

AB - PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of a new intervention, Ready~Steady, in terms of demand, acceptability, implementation, and limited efficacy.DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial; repeated measures.SETTING: Two rural communities in Itasca County, Minnesota.SUBJECTS: Thirty participants were randomized to an intervention (n = 16) or attention-control (n = 14) group.INTERVENTION: Ready~Steady combined two components: (1) motivational (motivational support, social network support, empowering education), and (2) fall-reducing physical activities (PAs; guidance to practice leg-strengthening, balance, and flexibility activities and walking).MEASURES: Acceptability questionnaire and Indices of Procedural Consistency (investigator developed), Community Health Activity Model Program for Seniors Questionnaire (confirmed with accelerometry), Short Physical Performance Battery, Perceived Environmental Support Scale, Social Support for Exercise Questionnaire, Goal Attainment Scale, Index of Readiness, and Index of Self-Regulation.ANALYSIS: Descriptive statistics and a marginal approach to repeated-measures analysis of variance, using mixed-model procedures.RESULTS: Attrition was 7% and mean attendance was 7.2 of 8 sessions, participants evaluated Ready~Steady as acceptable, and implementation fidelity was good. The intervention group improved significantly more than the attention-control group in PA behavior, F1,27 = 11.92, p = .002; fall risk (functional balance and strength), F1,27 = 14.89, p = .001; support for exercise from friends, F1,27 = 11.44, p = .002; and self-regulation, F1,26 = 38.82, p < .005.CONCLUSION: The Ready~Steady intervention was feasible as evidenced by low attrition and good attendance and implementation, as well as positive effects on targeted outcomes and theoretical mechanisms of change.

KW - Accidental Falls, Physical Activity, Motivation, Wellness Programs, Intervention Studies, Prevention Research. Manuscript format: research, quantitative evaluation

KW - Health focus: physical activity, fall prevention

KW - Outcome measure: physical activity behavior

KW - Research purpose: feasibility study

KW - Setting: rural communities

KW - Strategy: skill building/behavioral change

KW - Study design: randomized controlled trial

KW - Target population age: seniors

KW - Target population circumstances: community-dwelling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015470629&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85015470629&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 638

EP - 644

JO - American Journal of Health Promotion

JF - American Journal of Health Promotion

SN - 0890-1171

IS - 8

ER -