College students' study strategies as a function of testing

An investigation into metacognitive self-regulation

Margaret E. Ross, Samuel B. Green, Jill D. Salisbury-Glennon, Nona Tollefson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We conducted the present study to investigate whether college students adjust their study strategies to meet the cognitive demands of testing, a metacognitive self-regulatory skill. Participants were randomly assigned to one of the two testing conditions. In one condition we told participants to study for a test that required deep-level cognitive processing and in the other to study for a test that required surface-level cognitive processing. Results suggested that college students adjust their study strategies so that they are in line with the cognitive processing demands of tests and that performance is mediated by the study strategies that are used.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)361-375
Number of pages15
JournalInnovative Higher Education
Volume30
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2006

Fingerprint

self-regulation
student
performance

Keywords

  • Academic achievement
  • Learning strategies
  • Metacognition
  • Test expectancy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

College students' study strategies as a function of testing : An investigation into metacognitive self-regulation. / Ross, Margaret E.; Green, Samuel B.; Salisbury-Glennon, Jill D.; Tollefson, Nona.

In: Innovative Higher Education, Vol. 30, No. 5, 03.2006, p. 361-375.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ross, Margaret E. ; Green, Samuel B. ; Salisbury-Glennon, Jill D. ; Tollefson, Nona. / College students' study strategies as a function of testing : An investigation into metacognitive self-regulation. In: Innovative Higher Education. 2006 ; Vol. 30, No. 5. pp. 361-375.
@article{48043392dc304f209be6d5280af11b9e,
title = "College students' study strategies as a function of testing: An investigation into metacognitive self-regulation",
abstract = "We conducted the present study to investigate whether college students adjust their study strategies to meet the cognitive demands of testing, a metacognitive self-regulatory skill. Participants were randomly assigned to one of the two testing conditions. In one condition we told participants to study for a test that required deep-level cognitive processing and in the other to study for a test that required surface-level cognitive processing. Results suggested that college students adjust their study strategies so that they are in line with the cognitive processing demands of tests and that performance is mediated by the study strategies that are used.",
keywords = "Academic achievement, Learning strategies, Metacognition, Test expectancy",
author = "Ross, {Margaret E.} and Green, {Samuel B.} and Salisbury-Glennon, {Jill D.} and Nona Tollefson",
year = "2006",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1007/s10755-005-9004-2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "361--375",
journal = "Innovative Higher Education",
issn = "0742-5627",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - College students' study strategies as a function of testing

T2 - An investigation into metacognitive self-regulation

AU - Ross, Margaret E.

AU - Green, Samuel B.

AU - Salisbury-Glennon, Jill D.

AU - Tollefson, Nona

PY - 2006/3

Y1 - 2006/3

N2 - We conducted the present study to investigate whether college students adjust their study strategies to meet the cognitive demands of testing, a metacognitive self-regulatory skill. Participants were randomly assigned to one of the two testing conditions. In one condition we told participants to study for a test that required deep-level cognitive processing and in the other to study for a test that required surface-level cognitive processing. Results suggested that college students adjust their study strategies so that they are in line with the cognitive processing demands of tests and that performance is mediated by the study strategies that are used.

AB - We conducted the present study to investigate whether college students adjust their study strategies to meet the cognitive demands of testing, a metacognitive self-regulatory skill. Participants were randomly assigned to one of the two testing conditions. In one condition we told participants to study for a test that required deep-level cognitive processing and in the other to study for a test that required surface-level cognitive processing. Results suggested that college students adjust their study strategies so that they are in line with the cognitive processing demands of tests and that performance is mediated by the study strategies that are used.

KW - Academic achievement

KW - Learning strategies

KW - Metacognition

KW - Test expectancy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645323741&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33645323741&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10755-005-9004-2

DO - 10.1007/s10755-005-9004-2

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 361

EP - 375

JO - Innovative Higher Education

JF - Innovative Higher Education

SN - 0742-5627

IS - 5

ER -