College student perceptions of writing errors, text quality, and author characteristics

Adam C. Johnson, Joshua Wilson, Rod Roscoe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Both conventional wisdom and empirical research suggest that errors in writing impact perceptions of both writing quality and characteristics of the author. Texts that exhibit poor spelling and grammar, or lack compelling arguments and clear structure, are perceived as lower quality. Moreover, the authors themselves may be perceived as less intelligent, creative, hardworking or trustworthy. Using a within-subjects design, the current study systematically examined the effects of lower-level errors and higher-level errors on college students’ (n = 70) perceptions of multiple aspects of writing quality and author characteristics. Results demonstrated that students noticed both kinds of errors but were much more sensitive to lower-level errors than higher-level errors. Nearly identical patterns were observed for judgments of text quality and authors, and the sensitivity to lower-level errors was stronger for more-skilled readers. Implications for challenges and biases in peer assessment are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)72-87
Number of pages16
JournalAssessing Writing
Volume34
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2017

Fingerprint

student
College Students
Student Perceptions
wisdom
grammar
empirical research
lack
trend
Wisdom
Grammar
Reader
Spelling
Empirical Research
Peer Assessment
Conventional

Keywords

  • Peer assessment
  • Perceptions
  • Reading ability
  • Writing beliefs
  • Writing errors

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Education
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

College student perceptions of writing errors, text quality, and author characteristics. / Johnson, Adam C.; Wilson, Joshua; Roscoe, Rod.

In: Assessing Writing, Vol. 34, 01.10.2017, p. 72-87.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cd9bcf4a0c894094aef7ac0eb2726d35,
title = "College student perceptions of writing errors, text quality, and author characteristics",
abstract = "Both conventional wisdom and empirical research suggest that errors in writing impact perceptions of both writing quality and characteristics of the author. Texts that exhibit poor spelling and grammar, or lack compelling arguments and clear structure, are perceived as lower quality. Moreover, the authors themselves may be perceived as less intelligent, creative, hardworking or trustworthy. Using a within-subjects design, the current study systematically examined the effects of lower-level errors and higher-level errors on college students’ (n = 70) perceptions of multiple aspects of writing quality and author characteristics. Results demonstrated that students noticed both kinds of errors but were much more sensitive to lower-level errors than higher-level errors. Nearly identical patterns were observed for judgments of text quality and authors, and the sensitivity to lower-level errors was stronger for more-skilled readers. Implications for challenges and biases in peer assessment are discussed.",
keywords = "Peer assessment, Perceptions, Reading ability, Writing beliefs, Writing errors",
author = "Johnson, {Adam C.} and Joshua Wilson and Rod Roscoe",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.asw.2017.10.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "72--87",
journal = "Assessing Writing",
issn = "1075-2935",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - College student perceptions of writing errors, text quality, and author characteristics

AU - Johnson, Adam C.

AU - Wilson, Joshua

AU - Roscoe, Rod

PY - 2017/10/1

Y1 - 2017/10/1

N2 - Both conventional wisdom and empirical research suggest that errors in writing impact perceptions of both writing quality and characteristics of the author. Texts that exhibit poor spelling and grammar, or lack compelling arguments and clear structure, are perceived as lower quality. Moreover, the authors themselves may be perceived as less intelligent, creative, hardworking or trustworthy. Using a within-subjects design, the current study systematically examined the effects of lower-level errors and higher-level errors on college students’ (n = 70) perceptions of multiple aspects of writing quality and author characteristics. Results demonstrated that students noticed both kinds of errors but were much more sensitive to lower-level errors than higher-level errors. Nearly identical patterns were observed for judgments of text quality and authors, and the sensitivity to lower-level errors was stronger for more-skilled readers. Implications for challenges and biases in peer assessment are discussed.

AB - Both conventional wisdom and empirical research suggest that errors in writing impact perceptions of both writing quality and characteristics of the author. Texts that exhibit poor spelling and grammar, or lack compelling arguments and clear structure, are perceived as lower quality. Moreover, the authors themselves may be perceived as less intelligent, creative, hardworking or trustworthy. Using a within-subjects design, the current study systematically examined the effects of lower-level errors and higher-level errors on college students’ (n = 70) perceptions of multiple aspects of writing quality and author characteristics. Results demonstrated that students noticed both kinds of errors but were much more sensitive to lower-level errors than higher-level errors. Nearly identical patterns were observed for judgments of text quality and authors, and the sensitivity to lower-level errors was stronger for more-skilled readers. Implications for challenges and biases in peer assessment are discussed.

KW - Peer assessment

KW - Perceptions

KW - Reading ability

KW - Writing beliefs

KW - Writing errors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032727072&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85032727072&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.asw.2017.10.002

DO - 10.1016/j.asw.2017.10.002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85032727072

VL - 34

SP - 72

EP - 87

JO - Assessing Writing

JF - Assessing Writing

SN - 1075-2935

ER -