Collective action and the detrimental side of punishment

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Cooperative behavior is the subject of intense study in a wide range of scientific fields, yet its evolutionary origins remain largely unexplained. A leading explanation of cooperation is the mechanism of altruistic punishment, where individuals pay to punish others but receive no material benefit in return. Experiments have shown such punishment can induce cooperative outcomes in social dilemmas, though sometimes at the cost of reduced social welfare. However, experiments typically examine the effects of punishing low contributors without allowing others in the environment to respond. Thus, the full ramifications of punishment may not be well understood. Here, I use evolutionary simulations of agents playing a continuous prisoners dilemma to study behavior subsequent to an act of punishment, and how that subsequent behavior affects the efficiency of payoffs. Different network configurations are used to better understand the relative effects of social structure and individual strategies. Results show that when agents can either retaliate against their punisher, or punish those who ignore cheaters, the cooperative effects of punishment are reduced or eliminated. The magnitude of this effect is dependent on the density of the network in which the population is embedded. Overall, results suggest that a better understanding of the aftereffects of punishment is needed to assess the relationship between punishment and cooperative outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)327-346
Number of pages20
JournalEvolutionary Psychology
Volume11
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jun 11 2013

Fingerprint

Punishment
Social Welfare
Cooperative Behavior
Efficiency
Population

Keywords

  • Altruism
  • Cooperation
  • Retaliation
  • Simulation network
  • Social behavior
  • Strong reciprocity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Medicine(all)
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Collective action and the detrimental side of punishment. / Shutters, Shade.

In: Evolutionary Psychology, Vol. 11, No. 2, 11.06.2013, p. 327-346.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4808a56fcabd4ff1a13f1f5cd12cb1a8,
title = "Collective action and the detrimental side of punishment",
abstract = "Cooperative behavior is the subject of intense study in a wide range of scientific fields, yet its evolutionary origins remain largely unexplained. A leading explanation of cooperation is the mechanism of altruistic punishment, where individuals pay to punish others but receive no material benefit in return. Experiments have shown such punishment can induce cooperative outcomes in social dilemmas, though sometimes at the cost of reduced social welfare. However, experiments typically examine the effects of punishing low contributors without allowing others in the environment to respond. Thus, the full ramifications of punishment may not be well understood. Here, I use evolutionary simulations of agents playing a continuous prisoners dilemma to study behavior subsequent to an act of punishment, and how that subsequent behavior affects the efficiency of payoffs. Different network configurations are used to better understand the relative effects of social structure and individual strategies. Results show that when agents can either retaliate against their punisher, or punish those who ignore cheaters, the cooperative effects of punishment are reduced or eliminated. The magnitude of this effect is dependent on the density of the network in which the population is embedded. Overall, results suggest that a better understanding of the aftereffects of punishment is needed to assess the relationship between punishment and cooperative outcomes.",
keywords = "Altruism, Cooperation, Retaliation, Simulation network, Social behavior, Strong reciprocity",
author = "Shade Shutters",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
day = "11",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "327--346",
journal = "Evolutionary Psychology",
issn = "1474-7049",
publisher = "Human Nature Review",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Collective action and the detrimental side of punishment

AU - Shutters, Shade

PY - 2013/6/11

Y1 - 2013/6/11

N2 - Cooperative behavior is the subject of intense study in a wide range of scientific fields, yet its evolutionary origins remain largely unexplained. A leading explanation of cooperation is the mechanism of altruistic punishment, where individuals pay to punish others but receive no material benefit in return. Experiments have shown such punishment can induce cooperative outcomes in social dilemmas, though sometimes at the cost of reduced social welfare. However, experiments typically examine the effects of punishing low contributors without allowing others in the environment to respond. Thus, the full ramifications of punishment may not be well understood. Here, I use evolutionary simulations of agents playing a continuous prisoners dilemma to study behavior subsequent to an act of punishment, and how that subsequent behavior affects the efficiency of payoffs. Different network configurations are used to better understand the relative effects of social structure and individual strategies. Results show that when agents can either retaliate against their punisher, or punish those who ignore cheaters, the cooperative effects of punishment are reduced or eliminated. The magnitude of this effect is dependent on the density of the network in which the population is embedded. Overall, results suggest that a better understanding of the aftereffects of punishment is needed to assess the relationship between punishment and cooperative outcomes.

AB - Cooperative behavior is the subject of intense study in a wide range of scientific fields, yet its evolutionary origins remain largely unexplained. A leading explanation of cooperation is the mechanism of altruistic punishment, where individuals pay to punish others but receive no material benefit in return. Experiments have shown such punishment can induce cooperative outcomes in social dilemmas, though sometimes at the cost of reduced social welfare. However, experiments typically examine the effects of punishing low contributors without allowing others in the environment to respond. Thus, the full ramifications of punishment may not be well understood. Here, I use evolutionary simulations of agents playing a continuous prisoners dilemma to study behavior subsequent to an act of punishment, and how that subsequent behavior affects the efficiency of payoffs. Different network configurations are used to better understand the relative effects of social structure and individual strategies. Results show that when agents can either retaliate against their punisher, or punish those who ignore cheaters, the cooperative effects of punishment are reduced or eliminated. The magnitude of this effect is dependent on the density of the network in which the population is embedded. Overall, results suggest that a better understanding of the aftereffects of punishment is needed to assess the relationship between punishment and cooperative outcomes.

KW - Altruism

KW - Cooperation

KW - Retaliation

KW - Simulation network

KW - Social behavior

KW - Strong reciprocity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878639304&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878639304&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 23579191

AN - SCOPUS:84878639304

VL - 11

SP - 327

EP - 346

JO - Evolutionary Psychology

JF - Evolutionary Psychology

SN - 1474-7049

IS - 2

ER -