Abstract
This paper presents the development and evaluation of a technique (C-Sketch) for concept generation in a collaborative engineering design setting. The paper reviews both the intrinsic merit of C-Sketch, as well as relative merit compared to other techniques in the same class. This analysis is based on results from experiments conducted over five years. Both the process and outcome were evaluated, with greater emphasis on the latter. This study found that C-Sketch not only has intrinsic merit, but also measures higher in all outcomes when compared to Method 6-3-5. Also, C-Sketch was at least as good as the Gallery Method in the quality of ideas produced and better in variety and novelty of ideas. This paper is a consolidation of all empirical studies related to C-Sketch.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 168-198 |
| Number of pages | 31 |
| Journal | Journal of Creative Behavior |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| State | Published - Sep 2001 |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Psychology(all)
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
Cite this
Collaborative sketching (C-sketch) - An idea generation technique for engineering design. / Shah, Jami J.; Vargas-Hernandez, Noe; Summers, Joshua D.; Kulkarni, Santosh.
In: Journal of Creative Behavior, Vol. 35, No. 3, 09.2001, p. 168-198.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Collaborative sketching (C-sketch) - An idea generation technique for engineering design
AU - Shah, Jami J.
AU - Vargas-Hernandez, Noe
AU - Summers, Joshua D.
AU - Kulkarni, Santosh
PY - 2001/9
Y1 - 2001/9
N2 - This paper presents the development and evaluation of a technique (C-Sketch) for concept generation in a collaborative engineering design setting. The paper reviews both the intrinsic merit of C-Sketch, as well as relative merit compared to other techniques in the same class. This analysis is based on results from experiments conducted over five years. Both the process and outcome were evaluated, with greater emphasis on the latter. This study found that C-Sketch not only has intrinsic merit, but also measures higher in all outcomes when compared to Method 6-3-5. Also, C-Sketch was at least as good as the Gallery Method in the quality of ideas produced and better in variety and novelty of ideas. This paper is a consolidation of all empirical studies related to C-Sketch.
AB - This paper presents the development and evaluation of a technique (C-Sketch) for concept generation in a collaborative engineering design setting. The paper reviews both the intrinsic merit of C-Sketch, as well as relative merit compared to other techniques in the same class. This analysis is based on results from experiments conducted over five years. Both the process and outcome were evaluated, with greater emphasis on the latter. This study found that C-Sketch not only has intrinsic merit, but also measures higher in all outcomes when compared to Method 6-3-5. Also, C-Sketch was at least as good as the Gallery Method in the quality of ideas produced and better in variety and novelty of ideas. This paper is a consolidation of all empirical studies related to C-Sketch.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035642719&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035642719&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0035642719
VL - 35
SP - 168
EP - 198
JO - Journal of Creative Behavior
JF - Journal of Creative Behavior
SN - 0022-0175
IS - 3
ER -