Cognitive strategies, expectancy, and coping style in the control of pain

Thomas M. Beers, Paul Karoly

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

50 Scopus citations

Abstract

Measures of tolerance, self-reported pain threshold, and overall discomfort of cold-pressor pain were obtained from 114 male undergraduates in a pretest-training-posttest experiment. Training consisted of brief practice in 1 of 4 cognitive strategies: rational thinking, compatible imagery, incompatible imagery, and task-irrelevant cognition. Analyses of covariance indicated that (a) cognitive-imaginal strategies facilitated endurance of pain and raised self-reported threshold, (b) rational thinking and compatible imagery were generally the most effective treatments, (c) expectancy alone was not a significant pain-attenuating factor, (d) treatments did not affect discomfort ratings, and (e) individual differences in imaginal ability and coping style did not correlate with changes in any of the dependent measures. (3 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)179-180
Number of pages2
JournalJournal of consulting and clinical psychology
Volume47
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 1979
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • discomfort, male college students
  • rational thinking vs compatible vs incompatible imagery cognitive strategy, pain tolerance &
  • threshold &

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Cognitive strategies, expectancy, and coping style in the control of pain'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this