Coerced coordination, not cooperation

Montserrat Soler, Hillary Lenfesty

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Norenzayan et al. propose that Big God (BG) religions are largegroup cooperative enterprises that promote internal harmony and higher fertility resulting in "mutually beneficial exchanges" for those involved. We examine the possible distributions of costs and benefits within BG religions and propose that they are instead successful coordinating mechanisms that rely on intragroup competition and exploitation between the classes and sexes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e24
JournalBehavioral and Brain Sciences
Volume39
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

Religion
god
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Fertility
exploitation
fertility
costs
Deity
Costs
Exploitation
Enterprise
Harmony

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Physiology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Coerced coordination, not cooperation. / Soler, Montserrat; Lenfesty, Hillary.

In: Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 39, 01.01.2016, p. e24.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{1ebd7e3bc9af45db9da7ed508fb7141c,
title = "Coerced coordination, not cooperation",
abstract = "Norenzayan et al. propose that Big God (BG) religions are largegroup cooperative enterprises that promote internal harmony and higher fertility resulting in {"}mutually beneficial exchanges{"} for those involved. We examine the possible distributions of costs and benefits within BG religions and propose that they are instead successful coordinating mechanisms that rely on intragroup competition and exploitation between the classes and sexes.",
author = "Montserrat Soler and Hillary Lenfesty",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S0140525X15000540",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "e24",
journal = "Behavioral and Brain Sciences",
issn = "0140-525X",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Coerced coordination, not cooperation

AU - Soler, Montserrat

AU - Lenfesty, Hillary

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Norenzayan et al. propose that Big God (BG) religions are largegroup cooperative enterprises that promote internal harmony and higher fertility resulting in "mutually beneficial exchanges" for those involved. We examine the possible distributions of costs and benefits within BG religions and propose that they are instead successful coordinating mechanisms that rely on intragroup competition and exploitation between the classes and sexes.

AB - Norenzayan et al. propose that Big God (BG) religions are largegroup cooperative enterprises that promote internal harmony and higher fertility resulting in "mutually beneficial exchanges" for those involved. We examine the possible distributions of costs and benefits within BG religions and propose that they are instead successful coordinating mechanisms that rely on intragroup competition and exploitation between the classes and sexes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84969597505&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84969597505&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0140525X15000540

DO - 10.1017/S0140525X15000540

M3 - Review article

VL - 39

SP - e24

JO - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

JF - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

SN - 0140-525X

ER -