Closeness is enough for friends, but not mates or kin: Mate and kinship premiums in India and U.S.

Joseph Hackman, Alexander Danvers, Daniel Hruschka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Close relationship researchers have proposed that the increased sharing, helping, and sacrifice among social partners of all kinds-friends, spouses, and biological kin-are mediated by the same internal indicator: the feeling of emotional closeness. However, recent work on "kinship premiums" in the U.S. and Europe show that emotional closeness is not sufficient to account for increased giving among genetic kin, suggesting that closeness may not be a sufficient proximate mechanism to account for giving in other evolutionarily important relationships. Using a hypothetical social discounting paradigm with a $75 reward, we test for such premiums among mates, close friends, and kin in two cultural settings where researchers have proposed key differences in relationship cognition-India (N. =. 63) and the U.S. (N. =. 284). We find that emotional closeness substantially mediates (often fully) the effect of close friendship on the amount of money forgone, suggesting that this is a key factor in the increased sharing observed among friends. On the other hand, people on average report sacrificing an additional $8.3 (95% CI: $4.5-$12.1) for mates and $9.7 (95% CI: $6.5-$12.8) for genetic kin when removing the effects of closeness. Importantly, these effects are not statistically different across samples from the U.S. and India. These results show that people use relationship-specific information about genetic relatedness and pair bonding in addition to general indicators of emotional closeness when making decisions to share with others.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)137-145
Number of pages9
JournalEvolution and Human Behavior
Volume36
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2015

Fingerprint

kinship
India
researchers
interpersonal relationships
spouses
cognition
genetic relationships
decision making
Research Personnel
relatedness
Spouses
Reward
Cognition
Decision Making
Emotions
testing
sampling
effect
premium
Mate

Keywords

  • Altruism
  • Close relationships
  • Emotional closeness
  • Friendship
  • Kinship
  • Social discounting

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Closeness is enough for friends, but not mates or kin : Mate and kinship premiums in India and U.S. / Hackman, Joseph; Danvers, Alexander; Hruschka, Daniel.

In: Evolution and Human Behavior, Vol. 36, No. 2, 01.03.2015, p. 137-145.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b5e0ac4b3c3840b3a4307dd5f6602fce,
title = "Closeness is enough for friends, but not mates or kin: Mate and kinship premiums in India and U.S.",
abstract = "Close relationship researchers have proposed that the increased sharing, helping, and sacrifice among social partners of all kinds-friends, spouses, and biological kin-are mediated by the same internal indicator: the feeling of emotional closeness. However, recent work on {"}kinship premiums{"} in the U.S. and Europe show that emotional closeness is not sufficient to account for increased giving among genetic kin, suggesting that closeness may not be a sufficient proximate mechanism to account for giving in other evolutionarily important relationships. Using a hypothetical social discounting paradigm with a $75 reward, we test for such premiums among mates, close friends, and kin in two cultural settings where researchers have proposed key differences in relationship cognition-India (N. =. 63) and the U.S. (N. =. 284). We find that emotional closeness substantially mediates (often fully) the effect of close friendship on the amount of money forgone, suggesting that this is a key factor in the increased sharing observed among friends. On the other hand, people on average report sacrificing an additional $8.3 (95{\%} CI: $4.5-$12.1) for mates and $9.7 (95{\%} CI: $6.5-$12.8) for genetic kin when removing the effects of closeness. Importantly, these effects are not statistically different across samples from the U.S. and India. These results show that people use relationship-specific information about genetic relatedness and pair bonding in addition to general indicators of emotional closeness when making decisions to share with others.",
keywords = "Altruism, Close relationships, Emotional closeness, Friendship, Kinship, Social discounting",
author = "Joseph Hackman and Alexander Danvers and Daniel Hruschka",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.10.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "137--145",
journal = "Evolution and Human Behavior",
issn = "1090-5138",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Closeness is enough for friends, but not mates or kin

T2 - Mate and kinship premiums in India and U.S.

AU - Hackman, Joseph

AU - Danvers, Alexander

AU - Hruschka, Daniel

PY - 2015/3/1

Y1 - 2015/3/1

N2 - Close relationship researchers have proposed that the increased sharing, helping, and sacrifice among social partners of all kinds-friends, spouses, and biological kin-are mediated by the same internal indicator: the feeling of emotional closeness. However, recent work on "kinship premiums" in the U.S. and Europe show that emotional closeness is not sufficient to account for increased giving among genetic kin, suggesting that closeness may not be a sufficient proximate mechanism to account for giving in other evolutionarily important relationships. Using a hypothetical social discounting paradigm with a $75 reward, we test for such premiums among mates, close friends, and kin in two cultural settings where researchers have proposed key differences in relationship cognition-India (N. =. 63) and the U.S. (N. =. 284). We find that emotional closeness substantially mediates (often fully) the effect of close friendship on the amount of money forgone, suggesting that this is a key factor in the increased sharing observed among friends. On the other hand, people on average report sacrificing an additional $8.3 (95% CI: $4.5-$12.1) for mates and $9.7 (95% CI: $6.5-$12.8) for genetic kin when removing the effects of closeness. Importantly, these effects are not statistically different across samples from the U.S. and India. These results show that people use relationship-specific information about genetic relatedness and pair bonding in addition to general indicators of emotional closeness when making decisions to share with others.

AB - Close relationship researchers have proposed that the increased sharing, helping, and sacrifice among social partners of all kinds-friends, spouses, and biological kin-are mediated by the same internal indicator: the feeling of emotional closeness. However, recent work on "kinship premiums" in the U.S. and Europe show that emotional closeness is not sufficient to account for increased giving among genetic kin, suggesting that closeness may not be a sufficient proximate mechanism to account for giving in other evolutionarily important relationships. Using a hypothetical social discounting paradigm with a $75 reward, we test for such premiums among mates, close friends, and kin in two cultural settings where researchers have proposed key differences in relationship cognition-India (N. =. 63) and the U.S. (N. =. 284). We find that emotional closeness substantially mediates (often fully) the effect of close friendship on the amount of money forgone, suggesting that this is a key factor in the increased sharing observed among friends. On the other hand, people on average report sacrificing an additional $8.3 (95% CI: $4.5-$12.1) for mates and $9.7 (95% CI: $6.5-$12.8) for genetic kin when removing the effects of closeness. Importantly, these effects are not statistically different across samples from the U.S. and India. These results show that people use relationship-specific information about genetic relatedness and pair bonding in addition to general indicators of emotional closeness when making decisions to share with others.

KW - Altruism

KW - Close relationships

KW - Emotional closeness

KW - Friendship

KW - Kinship

KW - Social discounting

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922863584&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922863584&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.10.002

DO - 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.10.002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84922863584

VL - 36

SP - 137

EP - 145

JO - Evolution and Human Behavior

JF - Evolution and Human Behavior

SN - 1090-5138

IS - 2

ER -