Close encounters of the distracting kind: Identifying the cause of visual tracking errors

Gi Yeul Bae, Jonathan I. Flombaum

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Why can we track only so many objects? We addressed this question by asking when and how tracking errors emerge. To test the hypothesis that many tracking errors are target/nontarget confusions emerging from close encounters, we compared standard multiple-object tracking trials with trials on which a nontarget turned a random color whenever it approached within 4° of a target. This manipulation significantly improved performance by alleviating the correspondence challenge of a close encounter. Two control experiments showed that color change benefits were not merely due to target recovery. Follow-up experiments demonstrated that color change benefits did not accrue monotonically with distance but, instead, seemed to obey a step function; and an additional experiment demonstrated that, without color changes, the frequency of close encounters predicts tracking performance. Taken together, these experiments suggest that uncertainty about target location imposes the primary constraint on tracking, at times causing errors by leading to confusions between targets and nontargets.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)703-715
Number of pages13
JournalAttention, Perception, and Psychophysics
Volume74
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Color
cause
experiment
Uncertainty
performance
manipulation
uncertainty
Causes
Experiment
Color Change
Confusion

Keywords

  • Attention
  • Capacity limits
  • Multiple-object tracking
  • Resolution

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

Close encounters of the distracting kind : Identifying the cause of visual tracking errors. / Bae, Gi Yeul; Flombaum, Jonathan I.

In: Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, Vol. 74, No. 4, 01.05.2012, p. 703-715.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1aa8c79ec4d748ea85173c46ea15881e,
title = "Close encounters of the distracting kind: Identifying the cause of visual tracking errors",
abstract = "Why can we track only so many objects? We addressed this question by asking when and how tracking errors emerge. To test the hypothesis that many tracking errors are target/nontarget confusions emerging from close encounters, we compared standard multiple-object tracking trials with trials on which a nontarget turned a random color whenever it approached within 4° of a target. This manipulation significantly improved performance by alleviating the correspondence challenge of a close encounter. Two control experiments showed that color change benefits were not merely due to target recovery. Follow-up experiments demonstrated that color change benefits did not accrue monotonically with distance but, instead, seemed to obey a step function; and an additional experiment demonstrated that, without color changes, the frequency of close encounters predicts tracking performance. Taken together, these experiments suggest that uncertainty about target location imposes the primary constraint on tracking, at times causing errors by leading to confusions between targets and nontargets.",
keywords = "Attention, Capacity limits, Multiple-object tracking, Resolution",
author = "Bae, {Gi Yeul} and Flombaum, {Jonathan I.}",
year = "2012",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3758/s13414-011-0260-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "74",
pages = "703--715",
journal = "Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics",
issn = "1943-3921",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Close encounters of the distracting kind

T2 - Identifying the cause of visual tracking errors

AU - Bae, Gi Yeul

AU - Flombaum, Jonathan I.

PY - 2012/5/1

Y1 - 2012/5/1

N2 - Why can we track only so many objects? We addressed this question by asking when and how tracking errors emerge. To test the hypothesis that many tracking errors are target/nontarget confusions emerging from close encounters, we compared standard multiple-object tracking trials with trials on which a nontarget turned a random color whenever it approached within 4° of a target. This manipulation significantly improved performance by alleviating the correspondence challenge of a close encounter. Two control experiments showed that color change benefits were not merely due to target recovery. Follow-up experiments demonstrated that color change benefits did not accrue monotonically with distance but, instead, seemed to obey a step function; and an additional experiment demonstrated that, without color changes, the frequency of close encounters predicts tracking performance. Taken together, these experiments suggest that uncertainty about target location imposes the primary constraint on tracking, at times causing errors by leading to confusions between targets and nontargets.

AB - Why can we track only so many objects? We addressed this question by asking when and how tracking errors emerge. To test the hypothesis that many tracking errors are target/nontarget confusions emerging from close encounters, we compared standard multiple-object tracking trials with trials on which a nontarget turned a random color whenever it approached within 4° of a target. This manipulation significantly improved performance by alleviating the correspondence challenge of a close encounter. Two control experiments showed that color change benefits were not merely due to target recovery. Follow-up experiments demonstrated that color change benefits did not accrue monotonically with distance but, instead, seemed to obey a step function; and an additional experiment demonstrated that, without color changes, the frequency of close encounters predicts tracking performance. Taken together, these experiments suggest that uncertainty about target location imposes the primary constraint on tracking, at times causing errors by leading to confusions between targets and nontargets.

KW - Attention

KW - Capacity limits

KW - Multiple-object tracking

KW - Resolution

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858767508&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84858767508&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/s13414-011-0260-1

DO - 10.3758/s13414-011-0260-1

M3 - Article

C2 - 22215380

AN - SCOPUS:84858767508

VL - 74

SP - 703

EP - 715

JO - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

JF - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

SN - 1943-3921

IS - 4

ER -