Climate vulnerability mapping

A systematic review and future prospects

Alex de Sherbinin, Anamaria Bukvic, Guillaume Rohat, Melanie Gall, Brent McCusker, Benjamin Preston, Alex Apotsos, Carolyn Fish, Stefan Kienberger, Park Muhonda, Olga Wilhelmi, Denis Macharia, William Shubert, Richard Sliuzas, Brian Tomaszewski, Sainan Zhang

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Maps synthesizing climate, biophysical and socioeconomic data have become part of the standard tool-kit for communicating the risks of climate change to society. Vulnerability maps are used to direct attention to geographic areas where impacts on society are expected to be greatest and that may therefore require adaptation interventions. Under the Green Climate Fund and other bilateral climate adaptation funding mechanisms, donors are investing billions of dollars of adaptation funds, often with guidance from modeling results, visualized and communicated through maps and spatial decision support tools. This paper presents the results of a systematic review of 84 studies that map social vulnerability to climate impacts. These assessments are compiled by interdisciplinary teams of researchers, span many regions, range in scale from local to global, and vary in terms of frameworks, data, methods, and thematic foci. The goal is to identify common approaches to mapping, evaluate their strengths and limitations, and offer recommendations and future directions for the field. The systematic review finds some convergence around common frameworks developed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, frequent use of linear index aggregation, and common approaches to the selection and use of climate and socioeconomic data. Further, it identifies limitations such as a lack of future climate and socioeconomic projections in many studies, insufficient characterization of uncertainty, challenges in map validation, and insufficient engagement with policy audiences for those studies that purport to be policy relevant. Finally, it provides recommendations for addressing the identified shortcomings. This article is categorized under: Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate Change > Values-Based Approach to Vulnerability and Adaptation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere600
JournalWiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

future prospect
vulnerability
climate
climate change
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
climate effect
aggregation
dollar
projection
funding
uncertainty
lack
modeling
socioeconomics
Values
recommendation
policy
society

Keywords

  • adaptation
  • climate change
  • mapping
  • meta-analysis
  • social vulnerability
  • spatial indices
  • vulnerability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Atmospheric Science

Cite this

Climate vulnerability mapping : A systematic review and future prospects. / de Sherbinin, Alex; Bukvic, Anamaria; Rohat, Guillaume; Gall, Melanie; McCusker, Brent; Preston, Benjamin; Apotsos, Alex; Fish, Carolyn; Kienberger, Stefan; Muhonda, Park; Wilhelmi, Olga; Macharia, Denis; Shubert, William; Sliuzas, Richard; Tomaszewski, Brian; Zhang, Sainan.

In: Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

de Sherbinin, A, Bukvic, A, Rohat, G, Gall, M, McCusker, B, Preston, B, Apotsos, A, Fish, C, Kienberger, S, Muhonda, P, Wilhelmi, O, Macharia, D, Shubert, W, Sliuzas, R, Tomaszewski, B & Zhang, S 2019, 'Climate vulnerability mapping: A systematic review and future prospects', Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.600
de Sherbinin, Alex ; Bukvic, Anamaria ; Rohat, Guillaume ; Gall, Melanie ; McCusker, Brent ; Preston, Benjamin ; Apotsos, Alex ; Fish, Carolyn ; Kienberger, Stefan ; Muhonda, Park ; Wilhelmi, Olga ; Macharia, Denis ; Shubert, William ; Sliuzas, Richard ; Tomaszewski, Brian ; Zhang, Sainan. / Climate vulnerability mapping : A systematic review and future prospects. In: Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change. 2019.
@article{bffbe6fd9f8742999aca2984bb7edf43,
title = "Climate vulnerability mapping: A systematic review and future prospects",
abstract = "Maps synthesizing climate, biophysical and socioeconomic data have become part of the standard tool-kit for communicating the risks of climate change to society. Vulnerability maps are used to direct attention to geographic areas where impacts on society are expected to be greatest and that may therefore require adaptation interventions. Under the Green Climate Fund and other bilateral climate adaptation funding mechanisms, donors are investing billions of dollars of adaptation funds, often with guidance from modeling results, visualized and communicated through maps and spatial decision support tools. This paper presents the results of a systematic review of 84 studies that map social vulnerability to climate impacts. These assessments are compiled by interdisciplinary teams of researchers, span many regions, range in scale from local to global, and vary in terms of frameworks, data, methods, and thematic foci. The goal is to identify common approaches to mapping, evaluate their strengths and limitations, and offer recommendations and future directions for the field. The systematic review finds some convergence around common frameworks developed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, frequent use of linear index aggregation, and common approaches to the selection and use of climate and socioeconomic data. Further, it identifies limitations such as a lack of future climate and socioeconomic projections in many studies, insufficient characterization of uncertainty, challenges in map validation, and insufficient engagement with policy audiences for those studies that purport to be policy relevant. Finally, it provides recommendations for addressing the identified shortcomings. This article is categorized under: Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate Change > Values-Based Approach to Vulnerability and Adaptation.",
keywords = "adaptation, climate change, mapping, meta-analysis, social vulnerability, spatial indices, vulnerability",
author = "{de Sherbinin}, Alex and Anamaria Bukvic and Guillaume Rohat and Melanie Gall and Brent McCusker and Benjamin Preston and Alex Apotsos and Carolyn Fish and Stefan Kienberger and Park Muhonda and Olga Wilhelmi and Denis Macharia and William Shubert and Richard Sliuzas and Brian Tomaszewski and Sainan Zhang",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/wcc.600",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change",
issn = "1757-7780",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Climate vulnerability mapping

T2 - A systematic review and future prospects

AU - de Sherbinin, Alex

AU - Bukvic, Anamaria

AU - Rohat, Guillaume

AU - Gall, Melanie

AU - McCusker, Brent

AU - Preston, Benjamin

AU - Apotsos, Alex

AU - Fish, Carolyn

AU - Kienberger, Stefan

AU - Muhonda, Park

AU - Wilhelmi, Olga

AU - Macharia, Denis

AU - Shubert, William

AU - Sliuzas, Richard

AU - Tomaszewski, Brian

AU - Zhang, Sainan

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Maps synthesizing climate, biophysical and socioeconomic data have become part of the standard tool-kit for communicating the risks of climate change to society. Vulnerability maps are used to direct attention to geographic areas where impacts on society are expected to be greatest and that may therefore require adaptation interventions. Under the Green Climate Fund and other bilateral climate adaptation funding mechanisms, donors are investing billions of dollars of adaptation funds, often with guidance from modeling results, visualized and communicated through maps and spatial decision support tools. This paper presents the results of a systematic review of 84 studies that map social vulnerability to climate impacts. These assessments are compiled by interdisciplinary teams of researchers, span many regions, range in scale from local to global, and vary in terms of frameworks, data, methods, and thematic foci. The goal is to identify common approaches to mapping, evaluate their strengths and limitations, and offer recommendations and future directions for the field. The systematic review finds some convergence around common frameworks developed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, frequent use of linear index aggregation, and common approaches to the selection and use of climate and socioeconomic data. Further, it identifies limitations such as a lack of future climate and socioeconomic projections in many studies, insufficient characterization of uncertainty, challenges in map validation, and insufficient engagement with policy audiences for those studies that purport to be policy relevant. Finally, it provides recommendations for addressing the identified shortcomings. This article is categorized under: Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate Change > Values-Based Approach to Vulnerability and Adaptation.

AB - Maps synthesizing climate, biophysical and socioeconomic data have become part of the standard tool-kit for communicating the risks of climate change to society. Vulnerability maps are used to direct attention to geographic areas where impacts on society are expected to be greatest and that may therefore require adaptation interventions. Under the Green Climate Fund and other bilateral climate adaptation funding mechanisms, donors are investing billions of dollars of adaptation funds, often with guidance from modeling results, visualized and communicated through maps and spatial decision support tools. This paper presents the results of a systematic review of 84 studies that map social vulnerability to climate impacts. These assessments are compiled by interdisciplinary teams of researchers, span many regions, range in scale from local to global, and vary in terms of frameworks, data, methods, and thematic foci. The goal is to identify common approaches to mapping, evaluate their strengths and limitations, and offer recommendations and future directions for the field. The systematic review finds some convergence around common frameworks developed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, frequent use of linear index aggregation, and common approaches to the selection and use of climate and socioeconomic data. Further, it identifies limitations such as a lack of future climate and socioeconomic projections in many studies, insufficient characterization of uncertainty, challenges in map validation, and insufficient engagement with policy audiences for those studies that purport to be policy relevant. Finally, it provides recommendations for addressing the identified shortcomings. This article is categorized under: Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate Change > Values-Based Approach to Vulnerability and Adaptation.

KW - adaptation

KW - climate change

KW - mapping

KW - meta-analysis

KW - social vulnerability

KW - spatial indices

KW - vulnerability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069925226&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85069925226&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/wcc.600

DO - 10.1002/wcc.600

M3 - Review article

JO - Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change

JF - Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change

SN - 1757-7780

M1 - e600

ER -