Climate action co-benefits and integrated community planning: Uncovering the synergies and trade-offs

Robert Newell, Ann Dale, Mark Roseland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Engaging in climate action through integrated sustainability strategies can yield benefits for communities in more effective ways than through compartmentalized approaches. Such strategies can result in co-benefits, that is, community benefits that occur from acting on climate change that extend beyond mitigation and adaptation. For example, creating more walkable cities can be a strategy for reducing greenhouse gases, but can also lead to healthier communities. Climate strategies with co-benefits can result in "win-win" situations and thus improve practices for integrated community planning. However, this planning approach also presents challenges because it requires understanding complex relationships between community development practices and identifying synergies. In addition, some co-benefit strategies may also have associated challenges and trade-offs. This research examines climate action cobenefits and trade-offs in order to develop a comprehensive picture of the relationships and potential effects of implementing certain plans and strategies. The research consisted of collecting data on climate action efforts occurring in eleven BC (Canada) communities and coding it to identify climate strategies, co-benefits, challenges, and trade-offs. Relationships between codes were then identified through a coding matrix, and these were used to build a series of models that illustrate co-benefits, challenges, and trade-offs associated with local climate action. Each model centered on a particular area of climate action, including energy innovation, urban densification, mixed-use and downtown revitalization, building stock, ecological capital, trails and transportation, and waste and water. The models provide a holistic impression of the advantages and disadvantages associated with different plans and strategies, which in turn can guide both quantitative analyses and qualitative explorations that contribute toward integrated community planning and decision-making.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-23
Number of pages23
JournalInternational Journal of Climate Change: Impacts and Responses
Volume10
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

climate
community development
planning
greenhouse gas
mitigation
innovation
decision making
sustainability
climate change
matrix
energy
water
plan

Keywords

  • Co-benefits
  • Community climate action
  • Community planning
  • Integrated planning
  • Local adaptation and mitigation
  • Systems models
  • Trade-offs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Climate action co-benefits and integrated community planning : Uncovering the synergies and trade-offs. / Newell, Robert; Dale, Ann; Roseland, Mark.

In: International Journal of Climate Change: Impacts and Responses, Vol. 10, No. 4, 01.01.2018, p. 1-23.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{75f288a8b3604435863540c3eccbf8cc,
title = "Climate action co-benefits and integrated community planning: Uncovering the synergies and trade-offs",
abstract = "Engaging in climate action through integrated sustainability strategies can yield benefits for communities in more effective ways than through compartmentalized approaches. Such strategies can result in co-benefits, that is, community benefits that occur from acting on climate change that extend beyond mitigation and adaptation. For example, creating more walkable cities can be a strategy for reducing greenhouse gases, but can also lead to healthier communities. Climate strategies with co-benefits can result in {"}win-win{"} situations and thus improve practices for integrated community planning. However, this planning approach also presents challenges because it requires understanding complex relationships between community development practices and identifying synergies. In addition, some co-benefit strategies may also have associated challenges and trade-offs. This research examines climate action cobenefits and trade-offs in order to develop a comprehensive picture of the relationships and potential effects of implementing certain plans and strategies. The research consisted of collecting data on climate action efforts occurring in eleven BC (Canada) communities and coding it to identify climate strategies, co-benefits, challenges, and trade-offs. Relationships between codes were then identified through a coding matrix, and these were used to build a series of models that illustrate co-benefits, challenges, and trade-offs associated with local climate action. Each model centered on a particular area of climate action, including energy innovation, urban densification, mixed-use and downtown revitalization, building stock, ecological capital, trails and transportation, and waste and water. The models provide a holistic impression of the advantages and disadvantages associated with different plans and strategies, which in turn can guide both quantitative analyses and qualitative explorations that contribute toward integrated community planning and decision-making.",
keywords = "Co-benefits, Community climate action, Community planning, Integrated planning, Local adaptation and mitigation, Systems models, Trade-offs",
author = "Robert Newell and Ann Dale and Mark Roseland",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.18848/1835-7156",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "1--23",
journal = "International Journal of Climate Change: Impacts and Responses",
issn = "1835-7156",
publisher = "Common Ground Research Networks",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Climate action co-benefits and integrated community planning

T2 - Uncovering the synergies and trade-offs

AU - Newell, Robert

AU - Dale, Ann

AU - Roseland, Mark

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Engaging in climate action through integrated sustainability strategies can yield benefits for communities in more effective ways than through compartmentalized approaches. Such strategies can result in co-benefits, that is, community benefits that occur from acting on climate change that extend beyond mitigation and adaptation. For example, creating more walkable cities can be a strategy for reducing greenhouse gases, but can also lead to healthier communities. Climate strategies with co-benefits can result in "win-win" situations and thus improve practices for integrated community planning. However, this planning approach also presents challenges because it requires understanding complex relationships between community development practices and identifying synergies. In addition, some co-benefit strategies may also have associated challenges and trade-offs. This research examines climate action cobenefits and trade-offs in order to develop a comprehensive picture of the relationships and potential effects of implementing certain plans and strategies. The research consisted of collecting data on climate action efforts occurring in eleven BC (Canada) communities and coding it to identify climate strategies, co-benefits, challenges, and trade-offs. Relationships between codes were then identified through a coding matrix, and these were used to build a series of models that illustrate co-benefits, challenges, and trade-offs associated with local climate action. Each model centered on a particular area of climate action, including energy innovation, urban densification, mixed-use and downtown revitalization, building stock, ecological capital, trails and transportation, and waste and water. The models provide a holistic impression of the advantages and disadvantages associated with different plans and strategies, which in turn can guide both quantitative analyses and qualitative explorations that contribute toward integrated community planning and decision-making.

AB - Engaging in climate action through integrated sustainability strategies can yield benefits for communities in more effective ways than through compartmentalized approaches. Such strategies can result in co-benefits, that is, community benefits that occur from acting on climate change that extend beyond mitigation and adaptation. For example, creating more walkable cities can be a strategy for reducing greenhouse gases, but can also lead to healthier communities. Climate strategies with co-benefits can result in "win-win" situations and thus improve practices for integrated community planning. However, this planning approach also presents challenges because it requires understanding complex relationships between community development practices and identifying synergies. In addition, some co-benefit strategies may also have associated challenges and trade-offs. This research examines climate action cobenefits and trade-offs in order to develop a comprehensive picture of the relationships and potential effects of implementing certain plans and strategies. The research consisted of collecting data on climate action efforts occurring in eleven BC (Canada) communities and coding it to identify climate strategies, co-benefits, challenges, and trade-offs. Relationships between codes were then identified through a coding matrix, and these were used to build a series of models that illustrate co-benefits, challenges, and trade-offs associated with local climate action. Each model centered on a particular area of climate action, including energy innovation, urban densification, mixed-use and downtown revitalization, building stock, ecological capital, trails and transportation, and waste and water. The models provide a holistic impression of the advantages and disadvantages associated with different plans and strategies, which in turn can guide both quantitative analyses and qualitative explorations that contribute toward integrated community planning and decision-making.

KW - Co-benefits

KW - Community climate action

KW - Community planning

KW - Integrated planning

KW - Local adaptation and mitigation

KW - Systems models

KW - Trade-offs

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058055937&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058055937&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.18848/1835-7156

DO - 10.18848/1835-7156

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85058055937

VL - 10

SP - 1

EP - 23

JO - International Journal of Climate Change: Impacts and Responses

JF - International Journal of Climate Change: Impacts and Responses

SN - 1835-7156

IS - 4

ER -