Classifying the effectiveness of veterans affairs guideline implementation approaches

Bonnie J. BootsMiller, Jon W. Yankey, Stephen D. Flach, Marcia M. Ward, Thomas E. Vaughn, Karl F. Welke, Bradley Doebbeling

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Hospitals use numerous guideline implementation approaches with varying success. Approaches have been classified as consistently, variably, or minimally effective, with multiple approaches being most effective. This project assesses the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) use of effective guideline implementation approaches. A survey of 123 VA quality managers assessed the approaches used to implement the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, and major depressive disorder guidelines. Approaches were categorized based on their effectiveness, and the total number of approaches used was calculated. Commonly used approaches were clinical meetings, summaries, and revised forms. Consistently and minimally effective approaches were used most frequently. Most hospitals used 4-7 approaches. Odds ratios demonstrated that consistently effective approaches were paired with minimally and variably effective approaches. The frequent use of consistently effective approaches and multiple approaches benefits VA adherence. However, VA hospitals should consider selective combinations of approaches to ensure the use of the most effective implementation methods.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)248-254
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Medical Quality
Volume19
Issue number6
StatePublished - Nov 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Veterans
Guidelines
Veterans Hospitals
Major Depressive Disorder
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Diabetes Mellitus
Heart Failure
Odds Ratio

Keywords

  • Guideline implementation
  • Practice guidelines
  • Quality
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

BootsMiller, B. J., Yankey, J. W., Flach, S. D., Ward, M. M., Vaughn, T. E., Welke, K. F., & Doebbeling, B. (2004). Classifying the effectiveness of veterans affairs guideline implementation approaches. American Journal of Medical Quality, 19(6), 248-254.

Classifying the effectiveness of veterans affairs guideline implementation approaches. / BootsMiller, Bonnie J.; Yankey, Jon W.; Flach, Stephen D.; Ward, Marcia M.; Vaughn, Thomas E.; Welke, Karl F.; Doebbeling, Bradley.

In: American Journal of Medical Quality, Vol. 19, No. 6, 11.2004, p. 248-254.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

BootsMiller, BJ, Yankey, JW, Flach, SD, Ward, MM, Vaughn, TE, Welke, KF & Doebbeling, B 2004, 'Classifying the effectiveness of veterans affairs guideline implementation approaches', American Journal of Medical Quality, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 248-254.
BootsMiller BJ, Yankey JW, Flach SD, Ward MM, Vaughn TE, Welke KF et al. Classifying the effectiveness of veterans affairs guideline implementation approaches. American Journal of Medical Quality. 2004 Nov;19(6):248-254.
BootsMiller, Bonnie J. ; Yankey, Jon W. ; Flach, Stephen D. ; Ward, Marcia M. ; Vaughn, Thomas E. ; Welke, Karl F. ; Doebbeling, Bradley. / Classifying the effectiveness of veterans affairs guideline implementation approaches. In: American Journal of Medical Quality. 2004 ; Vol. 19, No. 6. pp. 248-254.
@article{4a6b6e6634a4415fa44fee3dc7bcd103,
title = "Classifying the effectiveness of veterans affairs guideline implementation approaches",
abstract = "Hospitals use numerous guideline implementation approaches with varying success. Approaches have been classified as consistently, variably, or minimally effective, with multiple approaches being most effective. This project assesses the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) use of effective guideline implementation approaches. A survey of 123 VA quality managers assessed the approaches used to implement the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, and major depressive disorder guidelines. Approaches were categorized based on their effectiveness, and the total number of approaches used was calculated. Commonly used approaches were clinical meetings, summaries, and revised forms. Consistently and minimally effective approaches were used most frequently. Most hospitals used 4-7 approaches. Odds ratios demonstrated that consistently effective approaches were paired with minimally and variably effective approaches. The frequent use of consistently effective approaches and multiple approaches benefits VA adherence. However, VA hospitals should consider selective combinations of approaches to ensure the use of the most effective implementation methods.",
keywords = "Guideline implementation, Practice guidelines, Quality, United States Department of Veterans Affairs",
author = "BootsMiller, {Bonnie J.} and Yankey, {Jon W.} and Flach, {Stephen D.} and Ward, {Marcia M.} and Vaughn, {Thomas E.} and Welke, {Karl F.} and Bradley Doebbeling",
year = "2004",
month = "11",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "248--254",
journal = "American Journal of Medical Quality",
issn = "1062-8606",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Classifying the effectiveness of veterans affairs guideline implementation approaches

AU - BootsMiller, Bonnie J.

AU - Yankey, Jon W.

AU - Flach, Stephen D.

AU - Ward, Marcia M.

AU - Vaughn, Thomas E.

AU - Welke, Karl F.

AU - Doebbeling, Bradley

PY - 2004/11

Y1 - 2004/11

N2 - Hospitals use numerous guideline implementation approaches with varying success. Approaches have been classified as consistently, variably, or minimally effective, with multiple approaches being most effective. This project assesses the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) use of effective guideline implementation approaches. A survey of 123 VA quality managers assessed the approaches used to implement the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, and major depressive disorder guidelines. Approaches were categorized based on their effectiveness, and the total number of approaches used was calculated. Commonly used approaches were clinical meetings, summaries, and revised forms. Consistently and minimally effective approaches were used most frequently. Most hospitals used 4-7 approaches. Odds ratios demonstrated that consistently effective approaches were paired with minimally and variably effective approaches. The frequent use of consistently effective approaches and multiple approaches benefits VA adherence. However, VA hospitals should consider selective combinations of approaches to ensure the use of the most effective implementation methods.

AB - Hospitals use numerous guideline implementation approaches with varying success. Approaches have been classified as consistently, variably, or minimally effective, with multiple approaches being most effective. This project assesses the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) use of effective guideline implementation approaches. A survey of 123 VA quality managers assessed the approaches used to implement the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, and major depressive disorder guidelines. Approaches were categorized based on their effectiveness, and the total number of approaches used was calculated. Commonly used approaches were clinical meetings, summaries, and revised forms. Consistently and minimally effective approaches were used most frequently. Most hospitals used 4-7 approaches. Odds ratios demonstrated that consistently effective approaches were paired with minimally and variably effective approaches. The frequent use of consistently effective approaches and multiple approaches benefits VA adherence. However, VA hospitals should consider selective combinations of approaches to ensure the use of the most effective implementation methods.

KW - Guideline implementation

KW - Practice guidelines

KW - Quality

KW - United States Department of Veterans Affairs

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=9344225706&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=9344225706&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 248

EP - 254

JO - American Journal of Medical Quality

JF - American Journal of Medical Quality

SN - 1062-8606

IS - 6

ER -