Citizens and captives: Depictions of the “conquered” in the Roman Empire

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article examines constructions of Roman citizenship in Roman state art, arguing that beginning in the late republic a broader concept of citizenship was prevalent—one rooted largely in shared culture and defined in opposition to a “barbarian” other. From this reading of state art, two arguments emerge: First, the emphasis on enculturation created an ever-moving line between Roman and barbarian. Second, the subject position created subjected both the Roman viewer and non-Roman subject. The article then turns to a reading of Greek orator Aristides’s Regarding Rome to show that the concept of citizenship stressed in state art is clearly present, though not necessarily well received.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)147-161
Number of pages15
JournalAdvances in the History of Rhetoric
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Roman Empire
citizenship
art
citizen
enculturation
republic
opposition
Art
Captive
Citizenship
Barbarians

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Literature and Literary Theory
  • Communication

Cite this

Citizens and captives : Depictions of the “conquered” in the Roman Empire. / Lamp-Fortuno, Kathleen.

In: Advances in the History of Rhetoric, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2015, p. 147-161.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ccc0909264bc4366bf31adb812ff4b06,
title = "Citizens and captives: Depictions of the “conquered” in the Roman Empire",
abstract = "This article examines constructions of Roman citizenship in Roman state art, arguing that beginning in the late republic a broader concept of citizenship was prevalent—one rooted largely in shared culture and defined in opposition to a “barbarian” other. From this reading of state art, two arguments emerge: First, the emphasis on enculturation created an ever-moving line between Roman and barbarian. Second, the subject position created subjected both the Roman viewer and non-Roman subject. The article then turns to a reading of Greek orator Aristides’s Regarding Rome to show that the concept of citizenship stressed in state art is clearly present, though not necessarily well received.",
author = "Kathleen Lamp-Fortuno",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1080/15362426.2015.1081526",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "147--161",
journal = "Advances in the History of Rhetoric",
issn = "1536-2426",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Citizens and captives

T2 - Depictions of the “conquered” in the Roman Empire

AU - Lamp-Fortuno, Kathleen

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This article examines constructions of Roman citizenship in Roman state art, arguing that beginning in the late republic a broader concept of citizenship was prevalent—one rooted largely in shared culture and defined in opposition to a “barbarian” other. From this reading of state art, two arguments emerge: First, the emphasis on enculturation created an ever-moving line between Roman and barbarian. Second, the subject position created subjected both the Roman viewer and non-Roman subject. The article then turns to a reading of Greek orator Aristides’s Regarding Rome to show that the concept of citizenship stressed in state art is clearly present, though not necessarily well received.

AB - This article examines constructions of Roman citizenship in Roman state art, arguing that beginning in the late republic a broader concept of citizenship was prevalent—one rooted largely in shared culture and defined in opposition to a “barbarian” other. From this reading of state art, two arguments emerge: First, the emphasis on enculturation created an ever-moving line between Roman and barbarian. Second, the subject position created subjected both the Roman viewer and non-Roman subject. The article then turns to a reading of Greek orator Aristides’s Regarding Rome to show that the concept of citizenship stressed in state art is clearly present, though not necessarily well received.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84953884835&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84953884835&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15362426.2015.1081526

DO - 10.1080/15362426.2015.1081526

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84953884835

VL - 18

SP - 147

EP - 161

JO - Advances in the History of Rhetoric

JF - Advances in the History of Rhetoric

SN - 1536-2426

IS - 2

ER -