Citizen initiative review: Engaging citizens in local government

Erica McFadden, Thomas Reilly

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

The state of Arizona in the United States allows citizen groups to put measures on the ballot for voter approval. Nearly three-quarters of Arizona voters polled in 2012 said they found ballot measures too complicated and confusing to fully comprehend. In response, an innovative deliberative technique known as a “mini-public” was piloted on a measure in Arizona’s largest municipality, Phoenix to change the city’s public sector pension plan. “Mini-publics” are where ordinary citizens are randomly chosen and tasked with learning, deliberating and offering an opinion or recommendation about a specific controversial topic, issue or proposal. This chapter evaluates whether the 2014 Arizona Citizen Initiative Review (CIR) was able to change participants’ knowledge base, values and actions. Additionally, it explores whether participants concept of governance changed and whether the CIR motivated participants to action in their communities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Governance of Local Communities
Subtitle of host publicationGlobal Perspectives and Challenges
PublisherNova Science Publishers, Inc.
Pages81-104
Number of pages24
ISBN (Electronic)9781536106527
ISBN (Print)9781536106381
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Local Government
Pensions
Knowledge Bases
Public Sector
Learning

Keywords

  • Citizen’s initiative review
  • Mini-publics
  • Participatory democracy in local governments

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

McFadden, E., & Reilly, T. (2017). Citizen initiative review: Engaging citizens in local government. In The Governance of Local Communities: Global Perspectives and Challenges (pp. 81-104). Nova Science Publishers, Inc..

Citizen initiative review : Engaging citizens in local government. / McFadden, Erica; Reilly, Thomas.

The Governance of Local Communities: Global Perspectives and Challenges. Nova Science Publishers, Inc., 2017. p. 81-104.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

McFadden, E & Reilly, T 2017, Citizen initiative review: Engaging citizens in local government. in The Governance of Local Communities: Global Perspectives and Challenges. Nova Science Publishers, Inc., pp. 81-104.
McFadden E, Reilly T. Citizen initiative review: Engaging citizens in local government. In The Governance of Local Communities: Global Perspectives and Challenges. Nova Science Publishers, Inc. 2017. p. 81-104
McFadden, Erica ; Reilly, Thomas. / Citizen initiative review : Engaging citizens in local government. The Governance of Local Communities: Global Perspectives and Challenges. Nova Science Publishers, Inc., 2017. pp. 81-104
@inbook{efc3f0640489402e9fa104d2c0e088fd,
title = "Citizen initiative review: Engaging citizens in local government",
abstract = "The state of Arizona in the United States allows citizen groups to put measures on the ballot for voter approval. Nearly three-quarters of Arizona voters polled in 2012 said they found ballot measures too complicated and confusing to fully comprehend. In response, an innovative deliberative technique known as a “mini-public” was piloted on a measure in Arizona’s largest municipality, Phoenix to change the city’s public sector pension plan. “Mini-publics” are where ordinary citizens are randomly chosen and tasked with learning, deliberating and offering an opinion or recommendation about a specific controversial topic, issue or proposal. This chapter evaluates whether the 2014 Arizona Citizen Initiative Review (CIR) was able to change participants’ knowledge base, values and actions. Additionally, it explores whether participants concept of governance changed and whether the CIR motivated participants to action in their communities.",
keywords = "Citizen’s initiative review, Mini-publics, Participatory democracy in local governments",
author = "Erica McFadden and Thomas Reilly",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781536106381",
pages = "81--104",
booktitle = "The Governance of Local Communities",
publisher = "Nova Science Publishers, Inc.",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Citizen initiative review

T2 - Engaging citizens in local government

AU - McFadden, Erica

AU - Reilly, Thomas

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - The state of Arizona in the United States allows citizen groups to put measures on the ballot for voter approval. Nearly three-quarters of Arizona voters polled in 2012 said they found ballot measures too complicated and confusing to fully comprehend. In response, an innovative deliberative technique known as a “mini-public” was piloted on a measure in Arizona’s largest municipality, Phoenix to change the city’s public sector pension plan. “Mini-publics” are where ordinary citizens are randomly chosen and tasked with learning, deliberating and offering an opinion or recommendation about a specific controversial topic, issue or proposal. This chapter evaluates whether the 2014 Arizona Citizen Initiative Review (CIR) was able to change participants’ knowledge base, values and actions. Additionally, it explores whether participants concept of governance changed and whether the CIR motivated participants to action in their communities.

AB - The state of Arizona in the United States allows citizen groups to put measures on the ballot for voter approval. Nearly three-quarters of Arizona voters polled in 2012 said they found ballot measures too complicated and confusing to fully comprehend. In response, an innovative deliberative technique known as a “mini-public” was piloted on a measure in Arizona’s largest municipality, Phoenix to change the city’s public sector pension plan. “Mini-publics” are where ordinary citizens are randomly chosen and tasked with learning, deliberating and offering an opinion or recommendation about a specific controversial topic, issue or proposal. This chapter evaluates whether the 2014 Arizona Citizen Initiative Review (CIR) was able to change participants’ knowledge base, values and actions. Additionally, it explores whether participants concept of governance changed and whether the CIR motivated participants to action in their communities.

KW - Citizen’s initiative review

KW - Mini-publics

KW - Participatory democracy in local governments

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021866038&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85021866038&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85021866038

SN - 9781536106381

SP - 81

EP - 104

BT - The Governance of Local Communities

PB - Nova Science Publishers, Inc.

ER -