Abstract
Commentators expressed contrasting views on the authors' examination of scientific achievement and editorial board membership in the management discipline. In response, the authors address key points with which they disagree and hold fast to their admonitory conclusions, neither compromising nor retreating from the recounting of base facts. If the authors' conclusions have prompted a measure of cognitive dissonance, they hope that any associated discomfort will lead to action on the part of all of the discipline's journals and their sponsoring organizations.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 276-295 |
Number of pages | 20 |
Journal | Organizational Research Methods |
Volume | 12 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Apr 2009 |
Keywords
- Bibliometrics
- Infometrics
- Philosophy of science
- Scientific ethos
- Scientometrics
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Decision Sciences
- Strategy and Management
- Management of Technology and Innovation