China's new rural “separating three property rights” land reform results in grassland degradation

Evidence from Inner Mongolia

Ang Li, Jianguo Wu, Xueyao Zhang, Jianguo Xue, Zhifeng Liu, Xingguo Han, Jianhui Huang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

China is currently implementing the “separating three property rights” (STPR) reform to consolidate rural land. This reform divides rural land property rights into three components: nontradable ownership, nontradable contractual rights and tradable land use rights. The STPR reform adopts the rental of grassland use rights, a market-oriented approach, as the main arrangement for grassland consolidation. However, this arrangement may undermine the cornerstones of grassland restoration, which are the security of grassland property and payments for ecosystem services (PES) policies. As an alternative to the market-oriented approach, cooperatives are also encouraged to consolidate grassland use rights. We used a natural experiment approach to systematically examine how two different land consolidation arrangements affected key grassland ecosystem services in Inner Mongolia. In rented grasslands, all ecosystem services except provisioning services degenerated severely. Traded grassland use rights were perceived as insecure, which led to predatory land use by tenants. In contrast, cooperative-managed grasslands showed no serious degradation in ecosystem services. However, these cooperatives limited their group size by chief kinship to avoid the free-rider problem; thus, they are unlikely to become a primary channel of grassland consolidation. Because PES policy subsidies are still allocated to grassland contractors rather than to tenants, these policies are irrelevant to the conservation of rented grasslands. Based on our analysis, we suggest several ways to improve this new rural land property reform to avoid a major wave of grassland degradation in China.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)170-182
Number of pages13
JournalLand Use Policy
Volume71
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2018

Fingerprint

land reform
property rights
Mongolia
agrarian reform
right of ownership
grasslands
grassland
China
degradation
consolidation
evidence
reform
ecosystem service
ecosystem services
land use
cooperatives
group size
market
kinship
restoration

Keywords

  • Cooperative
  • Ecosystem services
  • Grassland degradation
  • Grassland rental
  • Payment for ecosystem services
  • Rangeland ecology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Forestry
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

China's new rural “separating three property rights” land reform results in grassland degradation : Evidence from Inner Mongolia. / Li, Ang; Wu, Jianguo; Zhang, Xueyao; Xue, Jianguo; Liu, Zhifeng; Han, Xingguo; Huang, Jianhui.

In: Land Use Policy, Vol. 71, 01.02.2018, p. 170-182.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Li, Ang ; Wu, Jianguo ; Zhang, Xueyao ; Xue, Jianguo ; Liu, Zhifeng ; Han, Xingguo ; Huang, Jianhui. / China's new rural “separating three property rights” land reform results in grassland degradation : Evidence from Inner Mongolia. In: Land Use Policy. 2018 ; Vol. 71. pp. 170-182.
@article{7a40eca9f045478b970b9a2d0357baa3,
title = "China's new rural “separating three property rights” land reform results in grassland degradation: Evidence from Inner Mongolia",
abstract = "China is currently implementing the “separating three property rights” (STPR) reform to consolidate rural land. This reform divides rural land property rights into three components: nontradable ownership, nontradable contractual rights and tradable land use rights. The STPR reform adopts the rental of grassland use rights, a market-oriented approach, as the main arrangement for grassland consolidation. However, this arrangement may undermine the cornerstones of grassland restoration, which are the security of grassland property and payments for ecosystem services (PES) policies. As an alternative to the market-oriented approach, cooperatives are also encouraged to consolidate grassland use rights. We used a natural experiment approach to systematically examine how two different land consolidation arrangements affected key grassland ecosystem services in Inner Mongolia. In rented grasslands, all ecosystem services except provisioning services degenerated severely. Traded grassland use rights were perceived as insecure, which led to predatory land use by tenants. In contrast, cooperative-managed grasslands showed no serious degradation in ecosystem services. However, these cooperatives limited their group size by chief kinship to avoid the free-rider problem; thus, they are unlikely to become a primary channel of grassland consolidation. Because PES policy subsidies are still allocated to grassland contractors rather than to tenants, these policies are irrelevant to the conservation of rented grasslands. Based on our analysis, we suggest several ways to improve this new rural land property reform to avoid a major wave of grassland degradation in China.",
keywords = "Cooperative, Ecosystem services, Grassland degradation, Grassland rental, Payment for ecosystem services, Rangeland ecology",
author = "Ang Li and Jianguo Wu and Xueyao Zhang and Jianguo Xue and Zhifeng Liu and Xingguo Han and Jianhui Huang",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.11.052",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "71",
pages = "170--182",
journal = "Land Use Policy",
issn = "0264-8377",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - China's new rural “separating three property rights” land reform results in grassland degradation

T2 - Evidence from Inner Mongolia

AU - Li, Ang

AU - Wu, Jianguo

AU - Zhang, Xueyao

AU - Xue, Jianguo

AU - Liu, Zhifeng

AU - Han, Xingguo

AU - Huang, Jianhui

PY - 2018/2/1

Y1 - 2018/2/1

N2 - China is currently implementing the “separating three property rights” (STPR) reform to consolidate rural land. This reform divides rural land property rights into three components: nontradable ownership, nontradable contractual rights and tradable land use rights. The STPR reform adopts the rental of grassland use rights, a market-oriented approach, as the main arrangement for grassland consolidation. However, this arrangement may undermine the cornerstones of grassland restoration, which are the security of grassland property and payments for ecosystem services (PES) policies. As an alternative to the market-oriented approach, cooperatives are also encouraged to consolidate grassland use rights. We used a natural experiment approach to systematically examine how two different land consolidation arrangements affected key grassland ecosystem services in Inner Mongolia. In rented grasslands, all ecosystem services except provisioning services degenerated severely. Traded grassland use rights were perceived as insecure, which led to predatory land use by tenants. In contrast, cooperative-managed grasslands showed no serious degradation in ecosystem services. However, these cooperatives limited their group size by chief kinship to avoid the free-rider problem; thus, they are unlikely to become a primary channel of grassland consolidation. Because PES policy subsidies are still allocated to grassland contractors rather than to tenants, these policies are irrelevant to the conservation of rented grasslands. Based on our analysis, we suggest several ways to improve this new rural land property reform to avoid a major wave of grassland degradation in China.

AB - China is currently implementing the “separating three property rights” (STPR) reform to consolidate rural land. This reform divides rural land property rights into three components: nontradable ownership, nontradable contractual rights and tradable land use rights. The STPR reform adopts the rental of grassland use rights, a market-oriented approach, as the main arrangement for grassland consolidation. However, this arrangement may undermine the cornerstones of grassland restoration, which are the security of grassland property and payments for ecosystem services (PES) policies. As an alternative to the market-oriented approach, cooperatives are also encouraged to consolidate grassland use rights. We used a natural experiment approach to systematically examine how two different land consolidation arrangements affected key grassland ecosystem services in Inner Mongolia. In rented grasslands, all ecosystem services except provisioning services degenerated severely. Traded grassland use rights were perceived as insecure, which led to predatory land use by tenants. In contrast, cooperative-managed grasslands showed no serious degradation in ecosystem services. However, these cooperatives limited their group size by chief kinship to avoid the free-rider problem; thus, they are unlikely to become a primary channel of grassland consolidation. Because PES policy subsidies are still allocated to grassland contractors rather than to tenants, these policies are irrelevant to the conservation of rented grasslands. Based on our analysis, we suggest several ways to improve this new rural land property reform to avoid a major wave of grassland degradation in China.

KW - Cooperative

KW - Ecosystem services

KW - Grassland degradation

KW - Grassland rental

KW - Payment for ecosystem services

KW - Rangeland ecology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85036627907&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85036627907&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.11.052

DO - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.11.052

M3 - Article

VL - 71

SP - 170

EP - 182

JO - Land Use Policy

JF - Land Use Policy

SN - 0264-8377

ER -