Abstract

Women in doctoral programs in Science, Technology, Engineering andMath (STEM) leave without finishing at higher rates than men and, as with men, turn away from academic and research careers. This qualitative study examines the day-to-day influences on female doctoral students during their third or fourth year in physical science and engineering programs. Ethnographic cognitive interviewing and online incident reports document the specific experiences and reactions of 28 participants over a six-month period. The datawere analyzed to identify key incidents, categories and recurring themes. Some incidents contributed to women's growing sense of competence, recognition and identification of oneself as a scientist. Others fit a model of microaggressions and gender barriers in a predominantlymasculine culture. Problems of work-life balance were demonstrated for some women. Incidents generated responses by some participants that theywould disengage froma research-intensive career trajectory toward alternate career interests outside of academic research. The findings provide information about the lived experiences of women in doctoral programs and suggest that the metaphor of career pathways may be more useful than pipelines in explaining the direction of women who are advanced doctoral students in research-intensive fields.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number23
JournalSocial Sciences
Volume7
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 31 2018

Fingerprint

climate
engineering
incident
career
science
work-life-balance
female student
metaphor
experience
gender
student

Keywords

  • Gender inequity
  • Graduate students
  • Science and engineering
  • STEM
  • Women

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Chilly climates, balancing acts, and shifting pathways : What happens towomen in STEM doctoral programs. / Cabay, Marilyn; Bernstein, Bianca; Rivers, Melissa; Fabert, Natalie.

In: Social Sciences, Vol. 7, No. 2, 23, 31.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{aadde3dad10d4106adb2a70b4850465a,
title = "Chilly climates, balancing acts, and shifting pathways: What happens towomen in STEM doctoral programs",
abstract = "Women in doctoral programs in Science, Technology, Engineering andMath (STEM) leave without finishing at higher rates than men and, as with men, turn away from academic and research careers. This qualitative study examines the day-to-day influences on female doctoral students during their third or fourth year in physical science and engineering programs. Ethnographic cognitive interviewing and online incident reports document the specific experiences and reactions of 28 participants over a six-month period. The datawere analyzed to identify key incidents, categories and recurring themes. Some incidents contributed to women's growing sense of competence, recognition and identification of oneself as a scientist. Others fit a model of microaggressions and gender barriers in a predominantlymasculine culture. Problems of work-life balance were demonstrated for some women. Incidents generated responses by some participants that theywould disengage froma research-intensive career trajectory toward alternate career interests outside of academic research. The findings provide information about the lived experiences of women in doctoral programs and suggest that the metaphor of career pathways may be more useful than pipelines in explaining the direction of women who are advanced doctoral students in research-intensive fields.",
keywords = "Gender inequity, Graduate students, Science and engineering, STEM, Women",
author = "Marilyn Cabay and Bianca Bernstein and Melissa Rivers and Natalie Fabert",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "31",
doi = "10.3390/socsci7020023",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
journal = "Social Sciences",
issn = "2076-0760",
publisher = "Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Chilly climates, balancing acts, and shifting pathways

T2 - What happens towomen in STEM doctoral programs

AU - Cabay, Marilyn

AU - Bernstein, Bianca

AU - Rivers, Melissa

AU - Fabert, Natalie

PY - 2018/1/31

Y1 - 2018/1/31

N2 - Women in doctoral programs in Science, Technology, Engineering andMath (STEM) leave without finishing at higher rates than men and, as with men, turn away from academic and research careers. This qualitative study examines the day-to-day influences on female doctoral students during their third or fourth year in physical science and engineering programs. Ethnographic cognitive interviewing and online incident reports document the specific experiences and reactions of 28 participants over a six-month period. The datawere analyzed to identify key incidents, categories and recurring themes. Some incidents contributed to women's growing sense of competence, recognition and identification of oneself as a scientist. Others fit a model of microaggressions and gender barriers in a predominantlymasculine culture. Problems of work-life balance were demonstrated for some women. Incidents generated responses by some participants that theywould disengage froma research-intensive career trajectory toward alternate career interests outside of academic research. The findings provide information about the lived experiences of women in doctoral programs and suggest that the metaphor of career pathways may be more useful than pipelines in explaining the direction of women who are advanced doctoral students in research-intensive fields.

AB - Women in doctoral programs in Science, Technology, Engineering andMath (STEM) leave without finishing at higher rates than men and, as with men, turn away from academic and research careers. This qualitative study examines the day-to-day influences on female doctoral students during their third or fourth year in physical science and engineering programs. Ethnographic cognitive interviewing and online incident reports document the specific experiences and reactions of 28 participants over a six-month period. The datawere analyzed to identify key incidents, categories and recurring themes. Some incidents contributed to women's growing sense of competence, recognition and identification of oneself as a scientist. Others fit a model of microaggressions and gender barriers in a predominantlymasculine culture. Problems of work-life balance were demonstrated for some women. Incidents generated responses by some participants that theywould disengage froma research-intensive career trajectory toward alternate career interests outside of academic research. The findings provide information about the lived experiences of women in doctoral programs and suggest that the metaphor of career pathways may be more useful than pipelines in explaining the direction of women who are advanced doctoral students in research-intensive fields.

KW - Gender inequity

KW - Graduate students

KW - Science and engineering

KW - STEM

KW - Women

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042087653&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042087653&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/socsci7020023

DO - 10.3390/socsci7020023

M3 - Article

VL - 7

JO - Social Sciences

JF - Social Sciences

SN - 2076-0760

IS - 2

M1 - 23

ER -