Children's Justifications for Their Adult and Peer-Directed Compliant (Prosocial and Nonprosocial) Behaviors

Nancy Eisenberg, Teresa Lundy, Rita Shell, Karlsson Roth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purposes of this study were (a) to explore differences in the quality of child-child and adult-child interactions, and (b) to examine children's reasoning about their own compliant behaviors. Preschool children were observed in their classrooms and were interviewed briefly concerning their behavior whenever they were seen complying with either an adult's or a peer's request or demand. Only 32% of compliant behaviors requested by adults were prosocial (directly benefited another), whereas 76% of compliant behaviors requested by peers were prosocial. Children frequently justified behaviors requested by adults with references to authorities' dictates and punishment; however, this type of reasoning was seldom used in association with peer-initiated actions. Children attributed behaviors requested by peers to other-oriented or relational (friendship, liking) concerns more frequently than they did behaviors requested by adults. The difference in children's use of authority/punishment and other-oriented justifications for peer- versus adult-requested behaviors was found with regard to both prosocial and nonprosocial requests; the children used more justifications regarding liking of others and friendship only when the request was prosocial in content. The data are discussed in terms of their support for theorists' assertions regarding the difference in peer and adult interaction and in relation to the literature on children's reasoning and attributions about prosocial behaviors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)325-331
Number of pages7
JournalDevelopmental Psychology
Volume21
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1985

Fingerprint

Cooperative Behavior
Punishment
friendship
penalty
Child Behavior
Preschool Children
interaction
preschool child
attribution
classroom
demand

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Life-span and Life-course Studies
  • Demography
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Children's Justifications for Their Adult and Peer-Directed Compliant (Prosocial and Nonprosocial) Behaviors. / Eisenberg, Nancy; Lundy, Teresa; Shell, Rita; Roth, Karlsson.

In: Developmental Psychology, Vol. 21, No. 2, 03.1985, p. 325-331.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7f25b0182db440c5af1abf272b5a074d,
title = "Children's Justifications for Their Adult and Peer-Directed Compliant (Prosocial and Nonprosocial) Behaviors",
abstract = "The purposes of this study were (a) to explore differences in the quality of child-child and adult-child interactions, and (b) to examine children's reasoning about their own compliant behaviors. Preschool children were observed in their classrooms and were interviewed briefly concerning their behavior whenever they were seen complying with either an adult's or a peer's request or demand. Only 32{\%} of compliant behaviors requested by adults were prosocial (directly benefited another), whereas 76{\%} of compliant behaviors requested by peers were prosocial. Children frequently justified behaviors requested by adults with references to authorities' dictates and punishment; however, this type of reasoning was seldom used in association with peer-initiated actions. Children attributed behaviors requested by peers to other-oriented or relational (friendship, liking) concerns more frequently than they did behaviors requested by adults. The difference in children's use of authority/punishment and other-oriented justifications for peer- versus adult-requested behaviors was found with regard to both prosocial and nonprosocial requests; the children used more justifications regarding liking of others and friendship only when the request was prosocial in content. The data are discussed in terms of their support for theorists' assertions regarding the difference in peer and adult interaction and in relation to the literature on children's reasoning and attributions about prosocial behaviors.",
author = "Nancy Eisenberg and Teresa Lundy and Rita Shell and Karlsson Roth",
year = "1985",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1037/0012-1649.21.2.325",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "325--331",
journal = "Developmental Psychology",
issn = "0012-1649",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Children's Justifications for Their Adult and Peer-Directed Compliant (Prosocial and Nonprosocial) Behaviors

AU - Eisenberg, Nancy

AU - Lundy, Teresa

AU - Shell, Rita

AU - Roth, Karlsson

PY - 1985/3

Y1 - 1985/3

N2 - The purposes of this study were (a) to explore differences in the quality of child-child and adult-child interactions, and (b) to examine children's reasoning about their own compliant behaviors. Preschool children were observed in their classrooms and were interviewed briefly concerning their behavior whenever they were seen complying with either an adult's or a peer's request or demand. Only 32% of compliant behaviors requested by adults were prosocial (directly benefited another), whereas 76% of compliant behaviors requested by peers were prosocial. Children frequently justified behaviors requested by adults with references to authorities' dictates and punishment; however, this type of reasoning was seldom used in association with peer-initiated actions. Children attributed behaviors requested by peers to other-oriented or relational (friendship, liking) concerns more frequently than they did behaviors requested by adults. The difference in children's use of authority/punishment and other-oriented justifications for peer- versus adult-requested behaviors was found with regard to both prosocial and nonprosocial requests; the children used more justifications regarding liking of others and friendship only when the request was prosocial in content. The data are discussed in terms of their support for theorists' assertions regarding the difference in peer and adult interaction and in relation to the literature on children's reasoning and attributions about prosocial behaviors.

AB - The purposes of this study were (a) to explore differences in the quality of child-child and adult-child interactions, and (b) to examine children's reasoning about their own compliant behaviors. Preschool children were observed in their classrooms and were interviewed briefly concerning their behavior whenever they were seen complying with either an adult's or a peer's request or demand. Only 32% of compliant behaviors requested by adults were prosocial (directly benefited another), whereas 76% of compliant behaviors requested by peers were prosocial. Children frequently justified behaviors requested by adults with references to authorities' dictates and punishment; however, this type of reasoning was seldom used in association with peer-initiated actions. Children attributed behaviors requested by peers to other-oriented or relational (friendship, liking) concerns more frequently than they did behaviors requested by adults. The difference in children's use of authority/punishment and other-oriented justifications for peer- versus adult-requested behaviors was found with regard to both prosocial and nonprosocial requests; the children used more justifications regarding liking of others and friendship only when the request was prosocial in content. The data are discussed in terms of their support for theorists' assertions regarding the difference in peer and adult interaction and in relation to the literature on children's reasoning and attributions about prosocial behaviors.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0011526510&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0011526510&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0012-1649.21.2.325

DO - 10.1037/0012-1649.21.2.325

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0011526510

VL - 21

SP - 325

EP - 331

JO - Developmental Psychology

JF - Developmental Psychology

SN - 0012-1649

IS - 2

ER -