Children's conversational memory regarding a minor transgression and a subsequent interview

Stacia Roosevelt, Kelly McWilliams, Thomas D. Lyon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Children's memories for their conversations are commonly explored in child abuse cases. In 2 studies, we examined conversational recall in 154 4- to 9-year-old children's reports of an interaction with a stranger, some of whom were complicit in a transgression and were admonished to keep it a secret. Immediately afterward, all children were interviewed about their interaction. One week later, children were asked recall questions about their interaction with the stranger, their conversations with the stranger, and their conversations with the interviewer. Overall, interaction recall questions elicited few details about children's conversations, whereas conversation recall questions were effective in doing so. Accuracy was high in response to both the interaction and conversation recall questions, with no differences observed. Questions explicitly inquiring about coaching elicited higher error rates, as well as apparent attempts to maintain secrecy. Source errors were rare. Conversation recall questions elicited new transgression disclosures among a substantial percentage of children. The results provide tentative support for the use of recall questions in eliciting conversational information from children.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)379-392
Number of pages14
JournalPsychology, Public Policy, and Law
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2018

Fingerprint

Interviews
conversation
interview
interaction
Confidentiality
Child Abuse
Disclosure
secrecy
coaching
Research Design
abuse

Keywords

  • Child interviewing
  • Children's memory
  • Conversational memory
  • Conversational recall

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Law

Cite this

Children's conversational memory regarding a minor transgression and a subsequent interview. / Roosevelt, Stacia; McWilliams, Kelly; Lyon, Thomas D.

In: Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, Vol. 24, No. 3, 01.08.2018, p. 379-392.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{272f4df4469c407d95a1bee7861fdcc7,
title = "Children's conversational memory regarding a minor transgression and a subsequent interview",
abstract = "Children's memories for their conversations are commonly explored in child abuse cases. In 2 studies, we examined conversational recall in 154 4- to 9-year-old children's reports of an interaction with a stranger, some of whom were complicit in a transgression and were admonished to keep it a secret. Immediately afterward, all children were interviewed about their interaction. One week later, children were asked recall questions about their interaction with the stranger, their conversations with the stranger, and their conversations with the interviewer. Overall, interaction recall questions elicited few details about children's conversations, whereas conversation recall questions were effective in doing so. Accuracy was high in response to both the interaction and conversation recall questions, with no differences observed. Questions explicitly inquiring about coaching elicited higher error rates, as well as apparent attempts to maintain secrecy. Source errors were rare. Conversation recall questions elicited new transgression disclosures among a substantial percentage of children. The results provide tentative support for the use of recall questions in eliciting conversational information from children.",
keywords = "Child interviewing, Children's memory, Conversational memory, Conversational recall",
author = "Stacia Roosevelt and Kelly McWilliams and Lyon, {Thomas D.}",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/law0000176",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "379--392",
journal = "Psychology, Public Policy, and Law",
issn = "1076-8971",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Children's conversational memory regarding a minor transgression and a subsequent interview

AU - Roosevelt, Stacia

AU - McWilliams, Kelly

AU - Lyon, Thomas D.

PY - 2018/8/1

Y1 - 2018/8/1

N2 - Children's memories for their conversations are commonly explored in child abuse cases. In 2 studies, we examined conversational recall in 154 4- to 9-year-old children's reports of an interaction with a stranger, some of whom were complicit in a transgression and were admonished to keep it a secret. Immediately afterward, all children were interviewed about their interaction. One week later, children were asked recall questions about their interaction with the stranger, their conversations with the stranger, and their conversations with the interviewer. Overall, interaction recall questions elicited few details about children's conversations, whereas conversation recall questions were effective in doing so. Accuracy was high in response to both the interaction and conversation recall questions, with no differences observed. Questions explicitly inquiring about coaching elicited higher error rates, as well as apparent attempts to maintain secrecy. Source errors were rare. Conversation recall questions elicited new transgression disclosures among a substantial percentage of children. The results provide tentative support for the use of recall questions in eliciting conversational information from children.

AB - Children's memories for their conversations are commonly explored in child abuse cases. In 2 studies, we examined conversational recall in 154 4- to 9-year-old children's reports of an interaction with a stranger, some of whom were complicit in a transgression and were admonished to keep it a secret. Immediately afterward, all children were interviewed about their interaction. One week later, children were asked recall questions about their interaction with the stranger, their conversations with the stranger, and their conversations with the interviewer. Overall, interaction recall questions elicited few details about children's conversations, whereas conversation recall questions were effective in doing so. Accuracy was high in response to both the interaction and conversation recall questions, with no differences observed. Questions explicitly inquiring about coaching elicited higher error rates, as well as apparent attempts to maintain secrecy. Source errors were rare. Conversation recall questions elicited new transgression disclosures among a substantial percentage of children. The results provide tentative support for the use of recall questions in eliciting conversational information from children.

KW - Child interviewing

KW - Children's memory

KW - Conversational memory

KW - Conversational recall

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051073317&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051073317&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/law0000176

DO - 10.1037/law0000176

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85051073317

VL - 24

SP - 379

EP - 392

JO - Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

JF - Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

SN - 1076-8971

IS - 3

ER -