Checking for completeness of 24-h urine collection using para-Amino benzoic acid not necessary in the Observing Protein and Energy Nutrition study

A. F. Subar, D. Midthune, Natasha Tasevska, V. Kipnis, L. S. Freedman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background/Objectives:The orally administered para-Amino benzoic acid (PABA) is known to have near 100% excretion in urine and is used as a measure of 24-h urine collection completeness (referred to as PABAcheck). The purpose was to examine the effect of including urine collections deemed incomplete based on PABAcheck in a dietary measurement error study.Subjects/Methods:The Observing Protein and Energy Nutrition (OPEN) study was conducted in 1999-2000 and included 484 men and women aged 40-69 years. A food frequency questionnaire and 24-h dietary recalls were evaluated using recovery biomarkers that included urinary nitrogen and potassium from two 24-h urine collections. Statistical modeling determined the measurement error properties of dietary assessment instruments. In the original analyses, PABAcheck was used as a measure of complete urine collection; incomplete collections were either excluded or adjusted to acceptable levels. The OPEN data were reanalyzed including all urine collections and by using criteria based on self-reported missing voids to assess the differences.Results:Means and coefficients of variation for biomarker-based protein and potassium intakes, and measurement error model-based correlations and attenuation factors were similar regardless of whether PABAcheck or missed voids were considered.Conclusion:PABAcheck may not be required in large population-based biomarker studies. However, until there are more analyses evaluating the necessity of a PABAcheck, it is recommended that PABA be given to all participants, but not necessarily analyzed. Then, PABAcheck could be used selectively as a marker of completeness among the collections in which low levels of biomarker are detected or for which noncompliance is suspected.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)863-867
Number of pages5
JournalEuropean Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Volume67
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Urine Specimen Collection
Benzoic Acid
Biomarkers
Proteins
Potassium
Nitrogen
Urine
Food
Population

Keywords

  • diet
  • nutrition assessment
  • statistical bias
  • urine specimen collection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Cite this

Checking for completeness of 24-h urine collection using para-Amino benzoic acid not necessary in the Observing Protein and Energy Nutrition study. / Subar, A. F.; Midthune, D.; Tasevska, Natasha; Kipnis, V.; Freedman, L. S.

In: European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 67, No. 8, 08.2013, p. 863-867.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0a544cb7da64461db6d6d4235e0a90cc,
title = "Checking for completeness of 24-h urine collection using para-Amino benzoic acid not necessary in the Observing Protein and Energy Nutrition study",
abstract = "Background/Objectives:The orally administered para-Amino benzoic acid (PABA) is known to have near 100{\%} excretion in urine and is used as a measure of 24-h urine collection completeness (referred to as PABAcheck). The purpose was to examine the effect of including urine collections deemed incomplete based on PABAcheck in a dietary measurement error study.Subjects/Methods:The Observing Protein and Energy Nutrition (OPEN) study was conducted in 1999-2000 and included 484 men and women aged 40-69 years. A food frequency questionnaire and 24-h dietary recalls were evaluated using recovery biomarkers that included urinary nitrogen and potassium from two 24-h urine collections. Statistical modeling determined the measurement error properties of dietary assessment instruments. In the original analyses, PABAcheck was used as a measure of complete urine collection; incomplete collections were either excluded or adjusted to acceptable levels. The OPEN data were reanalyzed including all urine collections and by using criteria based on self-reported missing voids to assess the differences.Results:Means and coefficients of variation for biomarker-based protein and potassium intakes, and measurement error model-based correlations and attenuation factors were similar regardless of whether PABAcheck or missed voids were considered.Conclusion:PABAcheck may not be required in large population-based biomarker studies. However, until there are more analyses evaluating the necessity of a PABAcheck, it is recommended that PABA be given to all participants, but not necessarily analyzed. Then, PABAcheck could be used selectively as a marker of completeness among the collections in which low levels of biomarker are detected or for which noncompliance is suspected.",
keywords = "diet, nutrition assessment, statistical bias, urine specimen collection",
author = "Subar, {A. F.} and D. Midthune and Natasha Tasevska and V. Kipnis and Freedman, {L. S.}",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1038/ejcn.2013.62",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "67",
pages = "863--867",
journal = "European Journal of Clinical Nutrition",
issn = "0954-3007",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Checking for completeness of 24-h urine collection using para-Amino benzoic acid not necessary in the Observing Protein and Energy Nutrition study

AU - Subar, A. F.

AU - Midthune, D.

AU - Tasevska, Natasha

AU - Kipnis, V.

AU - Freedman, L. S.

PY - 2013/8

Y1 - 2013/8

N2 - Background/Objectives:The orally administered para-Amino benzoic acid (PABA) is known to have near 100% excretion in urine and is used as a measure of 24-h urine collection completeness (referred to as PABAcheck). The purpose was to examine the effect of including urine collections deemed incomplete based on PABAcheck in a dietary measurement error study.Subjects/Methods:The Observing Protein and Energy Nutrition (OPEN) study was conducted in 1999-2000 and included 484 men and women aged 40-69 years. A food frequency questionnaire and 24-h dietary recalls were evaluated using recovery biomarkers that included urinary nitrogen and potassium from two 24-h urine collections. Statistical modeling determined the measurement error properties of dietary assessment instruments. In the original analyses, PABAcheck was used as a measure of complete urine collection; incomplete collections were either excluded or adjusted to acceptable levels. The OPEN data were reanalyzed including all urine collections and by using criteria based on self-reported missing voids to assess the differences.Results:Means and coefficients of variation for biomarker-based protein and potassium intakes, and measurement error model-based correlations and attenuation factors were similar regardless of whether PABAcheck or missed voids were considered.Conclusion:PABAcheck may not be required in large population-based biomarker studies. However, until there are more analyses evaluating the necessity of a PABAcheck, it is recommended that PABA be given to all participants, but not necessarily analyzed. Then, PABAcheck could be used selectively as a marker of completeness among the collections in which low levels of biomarker are detected or for which noncompliance is suspected.

AB - Background/Objectives:The orally administered para-Amino benzoic acid (PABA) is known to have near 100% excretion in urine and is used as a measure of 24-h urine collection completeness (referred to as PABAcheck). The purpose was to examine the effect of including urine collections deemed incomplete based on PABAcheck in a dietary measurement error study.Subjects/Methods:The Observing Protein and Energy Nutrition (OPEN) study was conducted in 1999-2000 and included 484 men and women aged 40-69 years. A food frequency questionnaire and 24-h dietary recalls were evaluated using recovery biomarkers that included urinary nitrogen and potassium from two 24-h urine collections. Statistical modeling determined the measurement error properties of dietary assessment instruments. In the original analyses, PABAcheck was used as a measure of complete urine collection; incomplete collections were either excluded or adjusted to acceptable levels. The OPEN data were reanalyzed including all urine collections and by using criteria based on self-reported missing voids to assess the differences.Results:Means and coefficients of variation for biomarker-based protein and potassium intakes, and measurement error model-based correlations and attenuation factors were similar regardless of whether PABAcheck or missed voids were considered.Conclusion:PABAcheck may not be required in large population-based biomarker studies. However, until there are more analyses evaluating the necessity of a PABAcheck, it is recommended that PABA be given to all participants, but not necessarily analyzed. Then, PABAcheck could be used selectively as a marker of completeness among the collections in which low levels of biomarker are detected or for which noncompliance is suspected.

KW - diet

KW - nutrition assessment

KW - statistical bias

KW - urine specimen collection

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84881481036&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84881481036&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/ejcn.2013.62

DO - 10.1038/ejcn.2013.62

M3 - Article

VL - 67

SP - 863

EP - 867

JO - European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

JF - European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

SN - 0954-3007

IS - 8

ER -