Characterizing the role of communications in teams carrying out building inspection

Yangming Shi, Jing Du, Pingbo Tang, Dong Zhao

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Building inspection plays a critical role in the quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) of building construction projects. In practice, collaborative inspection is encouraged where a team co-review the as-built information and coordinate searches for discrepancies. Communication is considered as indispensable in this process. However, no existing methods clearly define what level of communication is sufficient but not redundant in various building inspection scenarios. Too much communication may lead to information overload and group polarization. Information overload refers to cases where perceived input information exceeds human cognitive capacity that affects decision quality; group polarization refers to the tendency for a group of people to converge into a central opinion held by a dominant team member. This study tested a hypothesis that excessive communication in collaborative building inspection compromises the performance of building inspection. The authors conducted a human-subject experiment (n = 71) to compare the building inspection performances of groups that were allowed to exchange information via verbal communications against those of groups conducting review and inspection independently. A multi-user virtual reality (VR) model uses a real building on Texas A&M University campus as the testbed to facilitate the review session. The authors documented the number of identified discrepancies as the performance indicator, including architectural, structural, and MEP discrepancies. The research results showed that groups practicing independent reviews and inspections outperformed groups allowed to have verbal communications. While other factors (e.g., the experience level of test subjects in building inspection) were controlled, the observed distinct performance suggests that communication may compromise building inspection quality to some extent or certain "dominants" in teams tend to mislead the discussion. Another reason might be relevant with the complexity of inspected built assets. Future investigations are necessary to comprehend such team inspection performance deterioration further.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationConstruction Research Congress 2018
Subtitle of host publicationConstruction Project Management - Selected Papers from the Construction Research Congress 2018
PublisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
Pages554-564
Number of pages11
Volume2018-April
ISBN (Electronic)9780784481271
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018
EventConstruction Research Congress 2018: Construction Project Managemen, CRC 2018 - New Orleans, United States
Duration: Apr 2 2018Apr 4 2018

Other

OtherConstruction Research Congress 2018: Construction Project Managemen, CRC 2018
CountryUnited States
CityNew Orleans
Period4/2/184/4/18

Fingerprint

Inspection
Communication
Polarization
Testbeds
Quality assurance
Virtual reality
Quality control
Deterioration

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Building and Construction

Cite this

Shi, Y., Du, J., Tang, P., & Zhao, D. (2018). Characterizing the role of communications in teams carrying out building inspection. In Construction Research Congress 2018: Construction Project Management - Selected Papers from the Construction Research Congress 2018 (Vol. 2018-April, pp. 554-564). American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481271.054

Characterizing the role of communications in teams carrying out building inspection. / Shi, Yangming; Du, Jing; Tang, Pingbo; Zhao, Dong.

Construction Research Congress 2018: Construction Project Management - Selected Papers from the Construction Research Congress 2018. Vol. 2018-April American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2018. p. 554-564.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Shi, Y, Du, J, Tang, P & Zhao, D 2018, Characterizing the role of communications in teams carrying out building inspection. in Construction Research Congress 2018: Construction Project Management - Selected Papers from the Construction Research Congress 2018. vol. 2018-April, American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), pp. 554-564, Construction Research Congress 2018: Construction Project Managemen, CRC 2018, New Orleans, United States, 4/2/18. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481271.054
Shi Y, Du J, Tang P, Zhao D. Characterizing the role of communications in teams carrying out building inspection. In Construction Research Congress 2018: Construction Project Management - Selected Papers from the Construction Research Congress 2018. Vol. 2018-April. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). 2018. p. 554-564 https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481271.054
Shi, Yangming ; Du, Jing ; Tang, Pingbo ; Zhao, Dong. / Characterizing the role of communications in teams carrying out building inspection. Construction Research Congress 2018: Construction Project Management - Selected Papers from the Construction Research Congress 2018. Vol. 2018-April American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2018. pp. 554-564
@inproceedings{1e305198497741968db8c09c4db77e05,
title = "Characterizing the role of communications in teams carrying out building inspection",
abstract = "Building inspection plays a critical role in the quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) of building construction projects. In practice, collaborative inspection is encouraged where a team co-review the as-built information and coordinate searches for discrepancies. Communication is considered as indispensable in this process. However, no existing methods clearly define what level of communication is sufficient but not redundant in various building inspection scenarios. Too much communication may lead to information overload and group polarization. Information overload refers to cases where perceived input information exceeds human cognitive capacity that affects decision quality; group polarization refers to the tendency for a group of people to converge into a central opinion held by a dominant team member. This study tested a hypothesis that excessive communication in collaborative building inspection compromises the performance of building inspection. The authors conducted a human-subject experiment (n = 71) to compare the building inspection performances of groups that were allowed to exchange information via verbal communications against those of groups conducting review and inspection independently. A multi-user virtual reality (VR) model uses a real building on Texas A&M University campus as the testbed to facilitate the review session. The authors documented the number of identified discrepancies as the performance indicator, including architectural, structural, and MEP discrepancies. The research results showed that groups practicing independent reviews and inspections outperformed groups allowed to have verbal communications. While other factors (e.g., the experience level of test subjects in building inspection) were controlled, the observed distinct performance suggests that communication may compromise building inspection quality to some extent or certain {"}dominants{"} in teams tend to mislead the discussion. Another reason might be relevant with the complexity of inspected built assets. Future investigations are necessary to comprehend such team inspection performance deterioration further.",
author = "Yangming Shi and Jing Du and Pingbo Tang and Dong Zhao",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1061/9780784481271.054",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2018-April",
pages = "554--564",
booktitle = "Construction Research Congress 2018",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Characterizing the role of communications in teams carrying out building inspection

AU - Shi, Yangming

AU - Du, Jing

AU - Tang, Pingbo

AU - Zhao, Dong

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Building inspection plays a critical role in the quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) of building construction projects. In practice, collaborative inspection is encouraged where a team co-review the as-built information and coordinate searches for discrepancies. Communication is considered as indispensable in this process. However, no existing methods clearly define what level of communication is sufficient but not redundant in various building inspection scenarios. Too much communication may lead to information overload and group polarization. Information overload refers to cases where perceived input information exceeds human cognitive capacity that affects decision quality; group polarization refers to the tendency for a group of people to converge into a central opinion held by a dominant team member. This study tested a hypothesis that excessive communication in collaborative building inspection compromises the performance of building inspection. The authors conducted a human-subject experiment (n = 71) to compare the building inspection performances of groups that were allowed to exchange information via verbal communications against those of groups conducting review and inspection independently. A multi-user virtual reality (VR) model uses a real building on Texas A&M University campus as the testbed to facilitate the review session. The authors documented the number of identified discrepancies as the performance indicator, including architectural, structural, and MEP discrepancies. The research results showed that groups practicing independent reviews and inspections outperformed groups allowed to have verbal communications. While other factors (e.g., the experience level of test subjects in building inspection) were controlled, the observed distinct performance suggests that communication may compromise building inspection quality to some extent or certain "dominants" in teams tend to mislead the discussion. Another reason might be relevant with the complexity of inspected built assets. Future investigations are necessary to comprehend such team inspection performance deterioration further.

AB - Building inspection plays a critical role in the quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) of building construction projects. In practice, collaborative inspection is encouraged where a team co-review the as-built information and coordinate searches for discrepancies. Communication is considered as indispensable in this process. However, no existing methods clearly define what level of communication is sufficient but not redundant in various building inspection scenarios. Too much communication may lead to information overload and group polarization. Information overload refers to cases where perceived input information exceeds human cognitive capacity that affects decision quality; group polarization refers to the tendency for a group of people to converge into a central opinion held by a dominant team member. This study tested a hypothesis that excessive communication in collaborative building inspection compromises the performance of building inspection. The authors conducted a human-subject experiment (n = 71) to compare the building inspection performances of groups that were allowed to exchange information via verbal communications against those of groups conducting review and inspection independently. A multi-user virtual reality (VR) model uses a real building on Texas A&M University campus as the testbed to facilitate the review session. The authors documented the number of identified discrepancies as the performance indicator, including architectural, structural, and MEP discrepancies. The research results showed that groups practicing independent reviews and inspections outperformed groups allowed to have verbal communications. While other factors (e.g., the experience level of test subjects in building inspection) were controlled, the observed distinct performance suggests that communication may compromise building inspection quality to some extent or certain "dominants" in teams tend to mislead the discussion. Another reason might be relevant with the complexity of inspected built assets. Future investigations are necessary to comprehend such team inspection performance deterioration further.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048671785&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048671785&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/9780784481271.054

DO - 10.1061/9780784481271.054

M3 - Conference contribution

VL - 2018-April

SP - 554

EP - 564

BT - Construction Research Congress 2018

PB - American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)

ER -