Characterizing Information Processing With a Mobile Device: Measurement of Simple and Choice Reaction Time

Daniel Burke, Susan Linder, Joshua Hirsch, Tanujit Dey, Daniel Kana, Shannon Ringenbach, David Schindler, Jay Alberts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Information processing is typically evaluated using simple reaction time (SRT) and choice reaction time (CRT) paradigms in which a specific response is initiated following a given stimulus. The measurement of reaction time (RT) has evolved from monitoring the timing of mechanical switches to computerized paradigms. The proliferation of mobile devices with touch screens makes them a natural next technological approach to assess information processing. The aims of this study were to determine the validity and reliability of using of a mobile device (Apple iPad or iTouch) to accurately measure RT. Sixty healthy young adults completed SRT and CRT tasks using a traditional test platform and mobile platforms on two occasions. The SRT was similar across test modality: 300, 287, and 280 milliseconds (ms) for the traditional, iPad, and iTouch, respectively. The CRT was similar within mobile devices, though slightly faster on the traditional: 359, 408, and 384 ms for traditional, iPad, and iTouch, respectively. Intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.79 to 0.85 for SRT and from 0.75 to 0.83 for CRT. The similarity and reliability of SRT across platforms and consistency of SRT and CRT across test conditions indicate that mobile devices provide the next generation of assessment platforms for information processing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)885-895
Number of pages11
JournalAssessment
Volume24
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2017

Fingerprint

Automatic Data Processing
Equipment and Supplies
Malus
Reproducibility of Results
Young Adult

Keywords

  • cognitive assessment
  • information processing
  • mobile technology
  • reaction time

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Characterizing Information Processing With a Mobile Device : Measurement of Simple and Choice Reaction Time. / Burke, Daniel; Linder, Susan; Hirsch, Joshua; Dey, Tanujit; Kana, Daniel; Ringenbach, Shannon; Schindler, David; Alberts, Jay.

In: Assessment, Vol. 24, No. 7, 01.10.2017, p. 885-895.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Burke, D, Linder, S, Hirsch, J, Dey, T, Kana, D, Ringenbach, S, Schindler, D & Alberts, J 2017, 'Characterizing Information Processing With a Mobile Device: Measurement of Simple and Choice Reaction Time', Assessment, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 885-895. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116633752
Burke, Daniel ; Linder, Susan ; Hirsch, Joshua ; Dey, Tanujit ; Kana, Daniel ; Ringenbach, Shannon ; Schindler, David ; Alberts, Jay. / Characterizing Information Processing With a Mobile Device : Measurement of Simple and Choice Reaction Time. In: Assessment. 2017 ; Vol. 24, No. 7. pp. 885-895.
@article{187941beba1146a09058bfdcd30a48bd,
title = "Characterizing Information Processing With a Mobile Device: Measurement of Simple and Choice Reaction Time",
abstract = "Information processing is typically evaluated using simple reaction time (SRT) and choice reaction time (CRT) paradigms in which a specific response is initiated following a given stimulus. The measurement of reaction time (RT) has evolved from monitoring the timing of mechanical switches to computerized paradigms. The proliferation of mobile devices with touch screens makes them a natural next technological approach to assess information processing. The aims of this study were to determine the validity and reliability of using of a mobile device (Apple iPad or iTouch) to accurately measure RT. Sixty healthy young adults completed SRT and CRT tasks using a traditional test platform and mobile platforms on two occasions. The SRT was similar across test modality: 300, 287, and 280 milliseconds (ms) for the traditional, iPad, and iTouch, respectively. The CRT was similar within mobile devices, though slightly faster on the traditional: 359, 408, and 384 ms for traditional, iPad, and iTouch, respectively. Intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.79 to 0.85 for SRT and from 0.75 to 0.83 for CRT. The similarity and reliability of SRT across platforms and consistency of SRT and CRT across test conditions indicate that mobile devices provide the next generation of assessment platforms for information processing.",
keywords = "cognitive assessment, information processing, mobile technology, reaction time",
author = "Daniel Burke and Susan Linder and Joshua Hirsch and Tanujit Dey and Daniel Kana and Shannon Ringenbach and David Schindler and Jay Alberts",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1073191116633752",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "885--895",
journal = "Assessment",
issn = "1073-1911",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Characterizing Information Processing With a Mobile Device

T2 - Measurement of Simple and Choice Reaction Time

AU - Burke, Daniel

AU - Linder, Susan

AU - Hirsch, Joshua

AU - Dey, Tanujit

AU - Kana, Daniel

AU - Ringenbach, Shannon

AU - Schindler, David

AU - Alberts, Jay

PY - 2017/10/1

Y1 - 2017/10/1

N2 - Information processing is typically evaluated using simple reaction time (SRT) and choice reaction time (CRT) paradigms in which a specific response is initiated following a given stimulus. The measurement of reaction time (RT) has evolved from monitoring the timing of mechanical switches to computerized paradigms. The proliferation of mobile devices with touch screens makes them a natural next technological approach to assess information processing. The aims of this study were to determine the validity and reliability of using of a mobile device (Apple iPad or iTouch) to accurately measure RT. Sixty healthy young adults completed SRT and CRT tasks using a traditional test platform and mobile platforms on two occasions. The SRT was similar across test modality: 300, 287, and 280 milliseconds (ms) for the traditional, iPad, and iTouch, respectively. The CRT was similar within mobile devices, though slightly faster on the traditional: 359, 408, and 384 ms for traditional, iPad, and iTouch, respectively. Intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.79 to 0.85 for SRT and from 0.75 to 0.83 for CRT. The similarity and reliability of SRT across platforms and consistency of SRT and CRT across test conditions indicate that mobile devices provide the next generation of assessment platforms for information processing.

AB - Information processing is typically evaluated using simple reaction time (SRT) and choice reaction time (CRT) paradigms in which a specific response is initiated following a given stimulus. The measurement of reaction time (RT) has evolved from monitoring the timing of mechanical switches to computerized paradigms. The proliferation of mobile devices with touch screens makes them a natural next technological approach to assess information processing. The aims of this study were to determine the validity and reliability of using of a mobile device (Apple iPad or iTouch) to accurately measure RT. Sixty healthy young adults completed SRT and CRT tasks using a traditional test platform and mobile platforms on two occasions. The SRT was similar across test modality: 300, 287, and 280 milliseconds (ms) for the traditional, iPad, and iTouch, respectively. The CRT was similar within mobile devices, though slightly faster on the traditional: 359, 408, and 384 ms for traditional, iPad, and iTouch, respectively. Intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.79 to 0.85 for SRT and from 0.75 to 0.83 for CRT. The similarity and reliability of SRT across platforms and consistency of SRT and CRT across test conditions indicate that mobile devices provide the next generation of assessment platforms for information processing.

KW - cognitive assessment

KW - information processing

KW - mobile technology

KW - reaction time

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029387868&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029387868&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1073191116633752

DO - 10.1177/1073191116633752

M3 - Article

C2 - 26933140

AN - SCOPUS:85029387868

VL - 24

SP - 885

EP - 895

JO - Assessment

JF - Assessment

SN - 1073-1911

IS - 7

ER -