Characteristics of biotic and abiotic removals of dissolved organic carbon in wastewater effluents using soil batch reactors

Woosuk Cha, Peter Fox, Fahad N. Mir, Heechul Choi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Biodegradable dissolved organic carbon (BDOC) analyses and abiotic adsorption of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) from different wastewater effluent were conducted to evaluate biotic and abiotic removal mechanisms as a function of the initial DOC concentration and source of DOC using soil batch reactors. To obtain high DOC concentrations, a laboratory-scale reverse osmosis unit was used. It was found that BDOC fraction was independent of the initial DOC concentration and was dependent on the source of wastewater and/or the types of wastewater treatment. The BDOC fractions varied from 9 to 73%. Trickling filter effluent (Tucson, Arizona) showed the highest BDOC, ranging from 65 to 73% biodegradable, while wastewater treated by the soil aquifer treatment (SAT) (NW-4) was found to be most refractory, with DOC removals of 9 to 14%. For nitrified/denitrified tertiary effluent (Mesa, Arizona) and secondary effluent (Scottsdale, Arizona), 36 to 42% removal of DOC was observed during the BDOC test. The amount of BDOC in the wastewater depended not on the concentration of DOC, but on the effectiveness of pretreatment. Abiotic adsorption capacity of wastewater effluent varied from 6 to 18%. Molecular weight distribution analyses showed that more than 50% of DOC in the Scottsdale concentrate had a molecular weight of less than 1000 Da, and no significant change in distribution profiles occurred after approximately 12% abiotic adsorption with both soils with acclimated microorganisms (SAT soil) and soils without acclimated microorganisms (non-SAT soils). Hence, preferential adsorption was not observed and the presence of acclimated microbes did not influence adsorption.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)130-136
Number of pages7
JournalWater Environment Research
Volume76
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2004

Fingerprint

Batch reactors
Organic carbon
dissolved organic carbon
effluents
wastewater
Effluents
Wastewater
effluent
Soils
biodegradability
soil
adsorption
Adsorption
Aquifers
aquifers
reactor
removal
aquifer
soil treatment
Microorganisms

Keywords

  • Adsorption
  • Biodegradable dissolved organic carbon
  • Molecular weight distribution
  • Soil aquifer treatment
  • Water reuse

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Aquatic Science
  • Water Science and Technology

Cite this

Characteristics of biotic and abiotic removals of dissolved organic carbon in wastewater effluents using soil batch reactors. / Cha, Woosuk; Fox, Peter; Mir, Fahad N.; Choi, Heechul.

In: Water Environment Research, Vol. 76, No. 2, 03.2004, p. 130-136.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{355c32b512c7429ca7c5ca1d870ee87e,
title = "Characteristics of biotic and abiotic removals of dissolved organic carbon in wastewater effluents using soil batch reactors",
abstract = "Biodegradable dissolved organic carbon (BDOC) analyses and abiotic adsorption of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) from different wastewater effluent were conducted to evaluate biotic and abiotic removal mechanisms as a function of the initial DOC concentration and source of DOC using soil batch reactors. To obtain high DOC concentrations, a laboratory-scale reverse osmosis unit was used. It was found that BDOC fraction was independent of the initial DOC concentration and was dependent on the source of wastewater and/or the types of wastewater treatment. The BDOC fractions varied from 9 to 73{\%}. Trickling filter effluent (Tucson, Arizona) showed the highest BDOC, ranging from 65 to 73{\%} biodegradable, while wastewater treated by the soil aquifer treatment (SAT) (NW-4) was found to be most refractory, with DOC removals of 9 to 14{\%}. For nitrified/denitrified tertiary effluent (Mesa, Arizona) and secondary effluent (Scottsdale, Arizona), 36 to 42{\%} removal of DOC was observed during the BDOC test. The amount of BDOC in the wastewater depended not on the concentration of DOC, but on the effectiveness of pretreatment. Abiotic adsorption capacity of wastewater effluent varied from 6 to 18{\%}. Molecular weight distribution analyses showed that more than 50{\%} of DOC in the Scottsdale concentrate had a molecular weight of less than 1000 Da, and no significant change in distribution profiles occurred after approximately 12{\%} abiotic adsorption with both soils with acclimated microorganisms (SAT soil) and soils without acclimated microorganisms (non-SAT soils). Hence, preferential adsorption was not observed and the presence of acclimated microbes did not influence adsorption.",
keywords = "Adsorption, Biodegradable dissolved organic carbon, Molecular weight distribution, Soil aquifer treatment, Water reuse",
author = "Woosuk Cha and Peter Fox and Mir, {Fahad N.} and Heechul Choi",
year = "2004",
month = "3",
doi = "10.2175/106143004X141654",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "76",
pages = "130--136",
journal = "Research Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation",
issn = "1061-4303",
publisher = "Water Environment Federation",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Characteristics of biotic and abiotic removals of dissolved organic carbon in wastewater effluents using soil batch reactors

AU - Cha, Woosuk

AU - Fox, Peter

AU - Mir, Fahad N.

AU - Choi, Heechul

PY - 2004/3

Y1 - 2004/3

N2 - Biodegradable dissolved organic carbon (BDOC) analyses and abiotic adsorption of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) from different wastewater effluent were conducted to evaluate biotic and abiotic removal mechanisms as a function of the initial DOC concentration and source of DOC using soil batch reactors. To obtain high DOC concentrations, a laboratory-scale reverse osmosis unit was used. It was found that BDOC fraction was independent of the initial DOC concentration and was dependent on the source of wastewater and/or the types of wastewater treatment. The BDOC fractions varied from 9 to 73%. Trickling filter effluent (Tucson, Arizona) showed the highest BDOC, ranging from 65 to 73% biodegradable, while wastewater treated by the soil aquifer treatment (SAT) (NW-4) was found to be most refractory, with DOC removals of 9 to 14%. For nitrified/denitrified tertiary effluent (Mesa, Arizona) and secondary effluent (Scottsdale, Arizona), 36 to 42% removal of DOC was observed during the BDOC test. The amount of BDOC in the wastewater depended not on the concentration of DOC, but on the effectiveness of pretreatment. Abiotic adsorption capacity of wastewater effluent varied from 6 to 18%. Molecular weight distribution analyses showed that more than 50% of DOC in the Scottsdale concentrate had a molecular weight of less than 1000 Da, and no significant change in distribution profiles occurred after approximately 12% abiotic adsorption with both soils with acclimated microorganisms (SAT soil) and soils without acclimated microorganisms (non-SAT soils). Hence, preferential adsorption was not observed and the presence of acclimated microbes did not influence adsorption.

AB - Biodegradable dissolved organic carbon (BDOC) analyses and abiotic adsorption of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) from different wastewater effluent were conducted to evaluate biotic and abiotic removal mechanisms as a function of the initial DOC concentration and source of DOC using soil batch reactors. To obtain high DOC concentrations, a laboratory-scale reverse osmosis unit was used. It was found that BDOC fraction was independent of the initial DOC concentration and was dependent on the source of wastewater and/or the types of wastewater treatment. The BDOC fractions varied from 9 to 73%. Trickling filter effluent (Tucson, Arizona) showed the highest BDOC, ranging from 65 to 73% biodegradable, while wastewater treated by the soil aquifer treatment (SAT) (NW-4) was found to be most refractory, with DOC removals of 9 to 14%. For nitrified/denitrified tertiary effluent (Mesa, Arizona) and secondary effluent (Scottsdale, Arizona), 36 to 42% removal of DOC was observed during the BDOC test. The amount of BDOC in the wastewater depended not on the concentration of DOC, but on the effectiveness of pretreatment. Abiotic adsorption capacity of wastewater effluent varied from 6 to 18%. Molecular weight distribution analyses showed that more than 50% of DOC in the Scottsdale concentrate had a molecular weight of less than 1000 Da, and no significant change in distribution profiles occurred after approximately 12% abiotic adsorption with both soils with acclimated microorganisms (SAT soil) and soils without acclimated microorganisms (non-SAT soils). Hence, preferential adsorption was not observed and the presence of acclimated microbes did not influence adsorption.

KW - Adsorption

KW - Biodegradable dissolved organic carbon

KW - Molecular weight distribution

KW - Soil aquifer treatment

KW - Water reuse

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3242759997&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3242759997&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2175/106143004X141654

DO - 10.2175/106143004X141654

M3 - Article

VL - 76

SP - 130

EP - 136

JO - Research Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation

JF - Research Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation

SN - 1061-4303

IS - 2

ER -