Changing the Culture of Academic Medicine: Critical Mass or Critical Actors?

Deborah Helitzer, Sharon L. Newbill, Gina Cardinali, Page S. Morahan, Shine Chang, Diane Magrane

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: By 2006, women constituted 34% of academic medical faculty, reaching a critical mass. Theoretically, with critical mass, culture and policy supportive of gender equity should be evident. We explore whether having a critical mass of women transforms institutional culture and organizational change. Methods: Career development program participants were interviewed to elucidate their experiences in academic health centers (AHCs). Focus group discussions were held with institutional leaders to explore their perceptions about contemporary challenges related to gender and leadership. Content analysis of both data sources revealed points of convergence. Findings were interpreted using the theory of critical mass. Results: Two nested domains emerged: the individual domain included the rewards and personal satisfaction of meaningful work, personal agency, tensions between cultural expectations of family and academic roles, and women's efforts to work for gender equity. The institutional domain depicted the sociocultural environment of AHCs that shaped women's experience, both personally and professionally, lack of institutional strategies to engage women in organizational initiatives, and the influence of one leader on women's ascent to leadership. Conclusions: The predominant evidence from this research demonstrates that the institutional barriers and sociocultural environment continue to be formidable obstacles confronting women, stalling the transformational effects expected from achieving a critical mass of women faculty. We conclude that the promise of critical mass as a turning point for women should be abandoned in favor of "critical actor" leaders, both women and men, who individually and collectively have the commitment and power to create gender-equitable cultures in AHCs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)540-548
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Women's Health
Volume26
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Medicine
Health
Organizational Innovation
Medical Faculties
Information Storage and Retrieval
Focus Groups
Reward
Research

Keywords

  • academic medicine
  • qualitative research
  • women faculty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Helitzer, D., Newbill, S. L., Cardinali, G., Morahan, P. S., Chang, S., & Magrane, D. (2017). Changing the Culture of Academic Medicine: Critical Mass or Critical Actors? Journal of Women's Health, 26(5), 540-548. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2016.6019

Changing the Culture of Academic Medicine : Critical Mass or Critical Actors? / Helitzer, Deborah; Newbill, Sharon L.; Cardinali, Gina; Morahan, Page S.; Chang, Shine; Magrane, Diane.

In: Journal of Women's Health, Vol. 26, No. 5, 01.05.2017, p. 540-548.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Helitzer, D, Newbill, SL, Cardinali, G, Morahan, PS, Chang, S & Magrane, D 2017, 'Changing the Culture of Academic Medicine: Critical Mass or Critical Actors?', Journal of Women's Health, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 540-548. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2016.6019
Helitzer, Deborah ; Newbill, Sharon L. ; Cardinali, Gina ; Morahan, Page S. ; Chang, Shine ; Magrane, Diane. / Changing the Culture of Academic Medicine : Critical Mass or Critical Actors?. In: Journal of Women's Health. 2017 ; Vol. 26, No. 5. pp. 540-548.
@article{8ab29c55b091402f822b40ae3491415f,
title = "Changing the Culture of Academic Medicine: Critical Mass or Critical Actors?",
abstract = "Purpose: By 2006, women constituted 34{\%} of academic medical faculty, reaching a critical mass. Theoretically, with critical mass, culture and policy supportive of gender equity should be evident. We explore whether having a critical mass of women transforms institutional culture and organizational change. Methods: Career development program participants were interviewed to elucidate their experiences in academic health centers (AHCs). Focus group discussions were held with institutional leaders to explore their perceptions about contemporary challenges related to gender and leadership. Content analysis of both data sources revealed points of convergence. Findings were interpreted using the theory of critical mass. Results: Two nested domains emerged: the individual domain included the rewards and personal satisfaction of meaningful work, personal agency, tensions between cultural expectations of family and academic roles, and women's efforts to work for gender equity. The institutional domain depicted the sociocultural environment of AHCs that shaped women's experience, both personally and professionally, lack of institutional strategies to engage women in organizational initiatives, and the influence of one leader on women's ascent to leadership. Conclusions: The predominant evidence from this research demonstrates that the institutional barriers and sociocultural environment continue to be formidable obstacles confronting women, stalling the transformational effects expected from achieving a critical mass of women faculty. We conclude that the promise of critical mass as a turning point for women should be abandoned in favor of {"}critical actor{"} leaders, both women and men, who individually and collectively have the commitment and power to create gender-equitable cultures in AHCs.",
keywords = "academic medicine, qualitative research, women faculty",
author = "Deborah Helitzer and Newbill, {Sharon L.} and Gina Cardinali and Morahan, {Page S.} and Shine Chang and Diane Magrane",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/jwh.2016.6019",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "540--548",
journal = "Journal of Women's Health",
issn = "1540-9996",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Changing the Culture of Academic Medicine

T2 - Critical Mass or Critical Actors?

AU - Helitzer, Deborah

AU - Newbill, Sharon L.

AU - Cardinali, Gina

AU - Morahan, Page S.

AU - Chang, Shine

AU - Magrane, Diane

PY - 2017/5/1

Y1 - 2017/5/1

N2 - Purpose: By 2006, women constituted 34% of academic medical faculty, reaching a critical mass. Theoretically, with critical mass, culture and policy supportive of gender equity should be evident. We explore whether having a critical mass of women transforms institutional culture and organizational change. Methods: Career development program participants were interviewed to elucidate their experiences in academic health centers (AHCs). Focus group discussions were held with institutional leaders to explore their perceptions about contemporary challenges related to gender and leadership. Content analysis of both data sources revealed points of convergence. Findings were interpreted using the theory of critical mass. Results: Two nested domains emerged: the individual domain included the rewards and personal satisfaction of meaningful work, personal agency, tensions between cultural expectations of family and academic roles, and women's efforts to work for gender equity. The institutional domain depicted the sociocultural environment of AHCs that shaped women's experience, both personally and professionally, lack of institutional strategies to engage women in organizational initiatives, and the influence of one leader on women's ascent to leadership. Conclusions: The predominant evidence from this research demonstrates that the institutional barriers and sociocultural environment continue to be formidable obstacles confronting women, stalling the transformational effects expected from achieving a critical mass of women faculty. We conclude that the promise of critical mass as a turning point for women should be abandoned in favor of "critical actor" leaders, both women and men, who individually and collectively have the commitment and power to create gender-equitable cultures in AHCs.

AB - Purpose: By 2006, women constituted 34% of academic medical faculty, reaching a critical mass. Theoretically, with critical mass, culture and policy supportive of gender equity should be evident. We explore whether having a critical mass of women transforms institutional culture and organizational change. Methods: Career development program participants were interviewed to elucidate their experiences in academic health centers (AHCs). Focus group discussions were held with institutional leaders to explore their perceptions about contemporary challenges related to gender and leadership. Content analysis of both data sources revealed points of convergence. Findings were interpreted using the theory of critical mass. Results: Two nested domains emerged: the individual domain included the rewards and personal satisfaction of meaningful work, personal agency, tensions between cultural expectations of family and academic roles, and women's efforts to work for gender equity. The institutional domain depicted the sociocultural environment of AHCs that shaped women's experience, both personally and professionally, lack of institutional strategies to engage women in organizational initiatives, and the influence of one leader on women's ascent to leadership. Conclusions: The predominant evidence from this research demonstrates that the institutional barriers and sociocultural environment continue to be formidable obstacles confronting women, stalling the transformational effects expected from achieving a critical mass of women faculty. We conclude that the promise of critical mass as a turning point for women should be abandoned in favor of "critical actor" leaders, both women and men, who individually and collectively have the commitment and power to create gender-equitable cultures in AHCs.

KW - academic medicine

KW - qualitative research

KW - women faculty

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019365930&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019365930&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/jwh.2016.6019

DO - 10.1089/jwh.2016.6019

M3 - Article

C2 - 28092473

AN - SCOPUS:85019365930

VL - 26

SP - 540

EP - 548

JO - Journal of Women's Health

JF - Journal of Women's Health

SN - 1540-9996

IS - 5

ER -