Change is good!? Analyzing the relationship between attention and nutrition facts panel modifications

Carola Grebitus, George C. Davis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many consumers do not pay attention to nutrition information, a necessity to make healthy food choices. We measure attention to a Nutrition Facts Panel (NFP) currently used in the U.S. and to a modified NFP that emphasizes key information, using eye-tracking in a between-subjects experiment. We test for differences between attention to the current and modified NFP but also for differences across food items. We find asymmetric effects, depending on the product. For healthier items more attention is paid to the modified NFP than to the current NFP. For less healthy items less attention is paid to the modified NFP than to the current NFP. Results suggest that a single modified design may not be uniformly effective.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)119-130
Number of pages12
JournalFood Policy
Volume73
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2017

Fingerprint

nutrition
Food
nutrition information
food
Nutrition
food choices
eyes
experiment
testing

Keywords

  • Calories per serving
  • Eye tracking
  • Healthy choice
  • Nutrition information
  • Serving size
  • U.S

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Food Science
  • Development
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Change is good!? Analyzing the relationship between attention and nutrition facts panel modifications. / Grebitus, Carola; Davis, George C.

In: Food Policy, Vol. 73, 01.12.2017, p. 119-130.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5e3c0873dd1d451ea1980e013a8b38be,
title = "Change is good!? Analyzing the relationship between attention and nutrition facts panel modifications",
abstract = "Many consumers do not pay attention to nutrition information, a necessity to make healthy food choices. We measure attention to a Nutrition Facts Panel (NFP) currently used in the U.S. and to a modified NFP that emphasizes key information, using eye-tracking in a between-subjects experiment. We test for differences between attention to the current and modified NFP but also for differences across food items. We find asymmetric effects, depending on the product. For healthier items more attention is paid to the modified NFP than to the current NFP. For less healthy items less attention is paid to the modified NFP than to the current NFP. Results suggest that a single modified design may not be uniformly effective.",
keywords = "Calories per serving, Eye tracking, Healthy choice, Nutrition information, Serving size, U.S",
author = "Carola Grebitus and Davis, {George C.}",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.10.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "73",
pages = "119--130",
journal = "Food Policy",
issn = "0306-9192",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Change is good!? Analyzing the relationship between attention and nutrition facts panel modifications

AU - Grebitus, Carola

AU - Davis, George C.

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - Many consumers do not pay attention to nutrition information, a necessity to make healthy food choices. We measure attention to a Nutrition Facts Panel (NFP) currently used in the U.S. and to a modified NFP that emphasizes key information, using eye-tracking in a between-subjects experiment. We test for differences between attention to the current and modified NFP but also for differences across food items. We find asymmetric effects, depending on the product. For healthier items more attention is paid to the modified NFP than to the current NFP. For less healthy items less attention is paid to the modified NFP than to the current NFP. Results suggest that a single modified design may not be uniformly effective.

AB - Many consumers do not pay attention to nutrition information, a necessity to make healthy food choices. We measure attention to a Nutrition Facts Panel (NFP) currently used in the U.S. and to a modified NFP that emphasizes key information, using eye-tracking in a between-subjects experiment. We test for differences between attention to the current and modified NFP but also for differences across food items. We find asymmetric effects, depending on the product. For healthier items more attention is paid to the modified NFP than to the current NFP. For less healthy items less attention is paid to the modified NFP than to the current NFP. Results suggest that a single modified design may not be uniformly effective.

KW - Calories per serving

KW - Eye tracking

KW - Healthy choice

KW - Nutrition information

KW - Serving size

KW - U.S

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85033551899&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85033551899&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.10.002

DO - 10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.10.002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85033551899

VL - 73

SP - 119

EP - 130

JO - Food Policy

JF - Food Policy

SN - 0306-9192

ER -