Challenging the credibility of alleged victims of child sexual abuse in Scottish courts

Zsófia A. Szojka, Samantha J. Andrews, Michael E. Lamb, Stacia Roosevelt, Thomas D. Lyon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examined the effects of credibility-challenging questions (n = 2,729) on 62 5- to 17-year-olds' testimony in child sexual abuse cases in Scotland by categorizing the type, source, and content of the credibility-challenging questions defense lawyers asked and assessing how children responded. Credibilitychallenging questions comprised 14.9% of all questions asked during cross-examination. Of defense lawyers' credibility-challenging questions, 77.8% focused generally on children's honesty, whereas the remainder referred to specific inconsistencies in the children's testimony. Children resisted credibility challenges 54% of the time, significantly more often than they provided compliant responses (26.8%). The tendency to resist was significantly lower for questions focused on specific rather than general inconsistencies, and peripheral rather than central content. Overall, children resisted credibility challenges more often when the aim and content of the question could be understood easily. As this was a field study, the accuracy of children's responses could not be assessed. The findings suggest that credibility-challenging questions that place unrealistic demands on children's memory capacities (e.g., questions focused on peripheral content or highly specific details) occur frequently, and that juries should be made aware of the disproportionate effects of such questioning on the consistency of children's testimony.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)200-210
Number of pages11
JournalPsychology, Public Policy, and Law
Volume23
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2017

Fingerprint

Sexual Child Abuse
sexual violence
credibility
testimony
Lawyers
lawyer
Scotland
examination

Keywords

  • Child sexual abuse
  • Children's responses
  • Credibility-challenging questions
  • Defense cross-examination
  • Scotland

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Law

Cite this

Challenging the credibility of alleged victims of child sexual abuse in Scottish courts. / Szojka, Zsófia A.; Andrews, Samantha J.; Lamb, Michael E.; Roosevelt, Stacia; Lyon, Thomas D.

In: Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, Vol. 23, No. 2, 01.05.2017, p. 200-210.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Szojka, Zsófia A. ; Andrews, Samantha J. ; Lamb, Michael E. ; Roosevelt, Stacia ; Lyon, Thomas D. / Challenging the credibility of alleged victims of child sexual abuse in Scottish courts. In: Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 2017 ; Vol. 23, No. 2. pp. 200-210.
@article{76238710609d4779bc8821c01ef7666e,
title = "Challenging the credibility of alleged victims of child sexual abuse in Scottish courts",
abstract = "This study examined the effects of credibility-challenging questions (n = 2,729) on 62 5- to 17-year-olds' testimony in child sexual abuse cases in Scotland by categorizing the type, source, and content of the credibility-challenging questions defense lawyers asked and assessing how children responded. Credibilitychallenging questions comprised 14.9{\%} of all questions asked during cross-examination. Of defense lawyers' credibility-challenging questions, 77.8{\%} focused generally on children's honesty, whereas the remainder referred to specific inconsistencies in the children's testimony. Children resisted credibility challenges 54{\%} of the time, significantly more often than they provided compliant responses (26.8{\%}). The tendency to resist was significantly lower for questions focused on specific rather than general inconsistencies, and peripheral rather than central content. Overall, children resisted credibility challenges more often when the aim and content of the question could be understood easily. As this was a field study, the accuracy of children's responses could not be assessed. The findings suggest that credibility-challenging questions that place unrealistic demands on children's memory capacities (e.g., questions focused on peripheral content or highly specific details) occur frequently, and that juries should be made aware of the disproportionate effects of such questioning on the consistency of children's testimony.",
keywords = "Child sexual abuse, Children's responses, Credibility-challenging questions, Defense cross-examination, Scotland",
author = "Szojka, {Zs{\'o}fia A.} and Andrews, {Samantha J.} and Lamb, {Michael E.} and Stacia Roosevelt and Lyon, {Thomas D.}",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/law0000117",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "200--210",
journal = "Psychology, Public Policy, and Law",
issn = "1076-8971",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Challenging the credibility of alleged victims of child sexual abuse in Scottish courts

AU - Szojka, Zsófia A.

AU - Andrews, Samantha J.

AU - Lamb, Michael E.

AU - Roosevelt, Stacia

AU - Lyon, Thomas D.

PY - 2017/5/1

Y1 - 2017/5/1

N2 - This study examined the effects of credibility-challenging questions (n = 2,729) on 62 5- to 17-year-olds' testimony in child sexual abuse cases in Scotland by categorizing the type, source, and content of the credibility-challenging questions defense lawyers asked and assessing how children responded. Credibilitychallenging questions comprised 14.9% of all questions asked during cross-examination. Of defense lawyers' credibility-challenging questions, 77.8% focused generally on children's honesty, whereas the remainder referred to specific inconsistencies in the children's testimony. Children resisted credibility challenges 54% of the time, significantly more often than they provided compliant responses (26.8%). The tendency to resist was significantly lower for questions focused on specific rather than general inconsistencies, and peripheral rather than central content. Overall, children resisted credibility challenges more often when the aim and content of the question could be understood easily. As this was a field study, the accuracy of children's responses could not be assessed. The findings suggest that credibility-challenging questions that place unrealistic demands on children's memory capacities (e.g., questions focused on peripheral content or highly specific details) occur frequently, and that juries should be made aware of the disproportionate effects of such questioning on the consistency of children's testimony.

AB - This study examined the effects of credibility-challenging questions (n = 2,729) on 62 5- to 17-year-olds' testimony in child sexual abuse cases in Scotland by categorizing the type, source, and content of the credibility-challenging questions defense lawyers asked and assessing how children responded. Credibilitychallenging questions comprised 14.9% of all questions asked during cross-examination. Of defense lawyers' credibility-challenging questions, 77.8% focused generally on children's honesty, whereas the remainder referred to specific inconsistencies in the children's testimony. Children resisted credibility challenges 54% of the time, significantly more often than they provided compliant responses (26.8%). The tendency to resist was significantly lower for questions focused on specific rather than general inconsistencies, and peripheral rather than central content. Overall, children resisted credibility challenges more often when the aim and content of the question could be understood easily. As this was a field study, the accuracy of children's responses could not be assessed. The findings suggest that credibility-challenging questions that place unrealistic demands on children's memory capacities (e.g., questions focused on peripheral content or highly specific details) occur frequently, and that juries should be made aware of the disproportionate effects of such questioning on the consistency of children's testimony.

KW - Child sexual abuse

KW - Children's responses

KW - Credibility-challenging questions

KW - Defense cross-examination

KW - Scotland

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009965938&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85009965938&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/law0000117

DO - 10.1037/law0000117

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85009965938

VL - 23

SP - 200

EP - 210

JO - Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

JF - Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

SN - 1076-8971

IS - 2

ER -