Challenges of transdisciplinary research as interactive knowledge generation experiences from transdisciplinary case study research

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

72 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There are already a variety of contributions focusing on the aspect of knowledge generation in transdisciplinary research. Along the same lines, this article analyses the features of knowledge generation in transdisciplinary case studies initiated at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich and conducted in Switzerland. Austria. Germany, and Sweden. The article starts with the description of what kind of knowledge is generated when and how in transdisciplinary case studies. On this basis, the quality of the underlying social interactions in terms of challenges, pitfalls and good practices is critically reflected against normative guidelines derived from the literature. Promoting the concept of transdisciplinary research as a "third epistemic way" - demarcated from involving laypersons in scientific research ("the primacy of science") as well as from classical decision support ("the primacy of practice") - four challenges of joint knowledge generation are discussed: "confounded agendas", "separate data philosophies", "reluctance to face exposure", and "co-existing values". A new type of mediated negotiation, so-called "epistemediation", is proposed at the transdisciplinary interface between scientists and local experts, incorporating a new type of multi-layered peer review of expertise.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)52-57
Number of pages6
JournalGAIA
Volume16
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Case study research
Transdisciplinary research
Knowledge generation
Primacy
decision
scientific research
science
exposure
Sweden
Good practice
Agenda
Decision support
Germany
Expertise
Social interaction
Austria
Switzerland
Peer review

Keywords

  • Case study research
  • Epistemology
  • Extended peer review
  • Interactive knowledge generation
  • Mediated negotiation
  • Transdisciplinarity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
  • Environmental Science (miscellaneous)

Cite this

@article{1b535323ed3a47a4a6acf1ea3891978c,
title = "Challenges of transdisciplinary research as interactive knowledge generation experiences from transdisciplinary case study research",
abstract = "There are already a variety of contributions focusing on the aspect of knowledge generation in transdisciplinary research. Along the same lines, this article analyses the features of knowledge generation in transdisciplinary case studies initiated at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich and conducted in Switzerland. Austria. Germany, and Sweden. The article starts with the description of what kind of knowledge is generated when and how in transdisciplinary case studies. On this basis, the quality of the underlying social interactions in terms of challenges, pitfalls and good practices is critically reflected against normative guidelines derived from the literature. Promoting the concept of transdisciplinary research as a {"}third epistemic way{"} - demarcated from involving laypersons in scientific research ({"}the primacy of science{"}) as well as from classical decision support ({"}the primacy of practice{"}) - four challenges of joint knowledge generation are discussed: {"}confounded agendas{"}, {"}separate data philosophies{"}, {"}reluctance to face exposure{"}, and {"}co-existing values{"}. A new type of mediated negotiation, so-called {"}epistemediation{"}, is proposed at the transdisciplinary interface between scientists and local experts, incorporating a new type of multi-layered peer review of expertise.",
keywords = "Case study research, Epistemology, Extended peer review, Interactive knowledge generation, Mediated negotiation, Transdisciplinarity",
author = "Arnim Wiek",
year = "2007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "52--57",
journal = "GAIA",
issn = "0940-5550",
publisher = "Oekom Verlag",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Challenges of transdisciplinary research as interactive knowledge generation experiences from transdisciplinary case study research

AU - Wiek, Arnim

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - There are already a variety of contributions focusing on the aspect of knowledge generation in transdisciplinary research. Along the same lines, this article analyses the features of knowledge generation in transdisciplinary case studies initiated at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich and conducted in Switzerland. Austria. Germany, and Sweden. The article starts with the description of what kind of knowledge is generated when and how in transdisciplinary case studies. On this basis, the quality of the underlying social interactions in terms of challenges, pitfalls and good practices is critically reflected against normative guidelines derived from the literature. Promoting the concept of transdisciplinary research as a "third epistemic way" - demarcated from involving laypersons in scientific research ("the primacy of science") as well as from classical decision support ("the primacy of practice") - four challenges of joint knowledge generation are discussed: "confounded agendas", "separate data philosophies", "reluctance to face exposure", and "co-existing values". A new type of mediated negotiation, so-called "epistemediation", is proposed at the transdisciplinary interface between scientists and local experts, incorporating a new type of multi-layered peer review of expertise.

AB - There are already a variety of contributions focusing on the aspect of knowledge generation in transdisciplinary research. Along the same lines, this article analyses the features of knowledge generation in transdisciplinary case studies initiated at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich and conducted in Switzerland. Austria. Germany, and Sweden. The article starts with the description of what kind of knowledge is generated when and how in transdisciplinary case studies. On this basis, the quality of the underlying social interactions in terms of challenges, pitfalls and good practices is critically reflected against normative guidelines derived from the literature. Promoting the concept of transdisciplinary research as a "third epistemic way" - demarcated from involving laypersons in scientific research ("the primacy of science") as well as from classical decision support ("the primacy of practice") - four challenges of joint knowledge generation are discussed: "confounded agendas", "separate data philosophies", "reluctance to face exposure", and "co-existing values". A new type of mediated negotiation, so-called "epistemediation", is proposed at the transdisciplinary interface between scientists and local experts, incorporating a new type of multi-layered peer review of expertise.

KW - Case study research

KW - Epistemology

KW - Extended peer review

KW - Interactive knowledge generation

KW - Mediated negotiation

KW - Transdisciplinarity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34147097490&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34147097490&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34147097490

VL - 16

SP - 52

EP - 57

JO - GAIA

JF - GAIA

SN - 0940-5550

IS - 1

ER -