CCCloud: Context-aware and credible cloud service selection based on subjective assessment and objective assessment

Lie Qu, Yan Wang, Mehmet A. Orgun, Ling Liu, Huan Liu, Athman Bouguettaya

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Due to the diversity and dynamic nature of cloud services, it is usually hard for potential cloud consumers to select the most suitable cloud service. This paper proposes CCCloud: a context-aware and credible cloud service selection model based on the comparison and aggregation of subjective assessments extracted from ordinary cloud consumers and objective assessments from quantitative performance testing parties. We propose a novel approach to evaluate cloud users' credibility, which not only can accurately evaluate how truthfully they assess cloud services, but also resist user collusion. In addition, in our model, objective assessments are used as benchmarks to filter out potentially biased subjective assessments, and then objective assessments and subjective assessments are aggregated to evaluate the overall performance of a cloud service. Furthermore, our model takes the contexts of objective assessments and subjective assessments into account. By calculating the similarity between different contexts, the benchmark level of objective assessments is dynamically adjusted according to context similarity, and the aggregated final scores of alternative cloud services are weighted by the similarity between the contexts of a potential cloud consumer and every testing party. This makes our cloud service selection model reflect potential cloud consumers' customized requirements more effectively. Finally, our proposed model is evaluated through the experiments conducted under different conditions. The experimental results demonstrate that our model significantly outperforms the existing work, especially in the resistance of user collusion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number7060708
Pages (from-to)369-383
Number of pages15
JournalIEEE Transactions on Services Computing
Volume8
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2015

Fingerprint

Testing
Context-aware
Service selection
Agglomeration
Experiments
Benchmark
Selection model
Collusion
Experiment
Filter
Credibility

Keywords

  • cloud service selection
  • context similarity
  • credibility of cloud users
  • subjective or objective assessments

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science Applications
  • Hardware and Architecture
  • Information Systems and Management
  • Computer Networks and Communications

Cite this

CCCloud : Context-aware and credible cloud service selection based on subjective assessment and objective assessment. / Qu, Lie; Wang, Yan; Orgun, Mehmet A.; Liu, Ling; Liu, Huan; Bouguettaya, Athman.

In: IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, Vol. 8, No. 3, 7060708, 01.05.2015, p. 369-383.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Qu, Lie ; Wang, Yan ; Orgun, Mehmet A. ; Liu, Ling ; Liu, Huan ; Bouguettaya, Athman. / CCCloud : Context-aware and credible cloud service selection based on subjective assessment and objective assessment. In: IEEE Transactions on Services Computing. 2015 ; Vol. 8, No. 3. pp. 369-383.
@article{70ca00b2fb2b4df5b3bf8563f4b838d5,
title = "CCCloud: Context-aware and credible cloud service selection based on subjective assessment and objective assessment",
abstract = "Due to the diversity and dynamic nature of cloud services, it is usually hard for potential cloud consumers to select the most suitable cloud service. This paper proposes CCCloud: a context-aware and credible cloud service selection model based on the comparison and aggregation of subjective assessments extracted from ordinary cloud consumers and objective assessments from quantitative performance testing parties. We propose a novel approach to evaluate cloud users' credibility, which not only can accurately evaluate how truthfully they assess cloud services, but also resist user collusion. In addition, in our model, objective assessments are used as benchmarks to filter out potentially biased subjective assessments, and then objective assessments and subjective assessments are aggregated to evaluate the overall performance of a cloud service. Furthermore, our model takes the contexts of objective assessments and subjective assessments into account. By calculating the similarity between different contexts, the benchmark level of objective assessments is dynamically adjusted according to context similarity, and the aggregated final scores of alternative cloud services are weighted by the similarity between the contexts of a potential cloud consumer and every testing party. This makes our cloud service selection model reflect potential cloud consumers' customized requirements more effectively. Finally, our proposed model is evaluated through the experiments conducted under different conditions. The experimental results demonstrate that our model significantly outperforms the existing work, especially in the resistance of user collusion.",
keywords = "cloud service selection, context similarity, credibility of cloud users, subjective or objective assessments",
author = "Lie Qu and Yan Wang and Orgun, {Mehmet A.} and Ling Liu and Huan Liu and Athman Bouguettaya",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1109/TSC.2015.2413111",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "369--383",
journal = "IEEE Transactions on Services Computing",
issn = "1939-1374",
publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - CCCloud

T2 - Context-aware and credible cloud service selection based on subjective assessment and objective assessment

AU - Qu, Lie

AU - Wang, Yan

AU - Orgun, Mehmet A.

AU - Liu, Ling

AU - Liu, Huan

AU - Bouguettaya, Athman

PY - 2015/5/1

Y1 - 2015/5/1

N2 - Due to the diversity and dynamic nature of cloud services, it is usually hard for potential cloud consumers to select the most suitable cloud service. This paper proposes CCCloud: a context-aware and credible cloud service selection model based on the comparison and aggregation of subjective assessments extracted from ordinary cloud consumers and objective assessments from quantitative performance testing parties. We propose a novel approach to evaluate cloud users' credibility, which not only can accurately evaluate how truthfully they assess cloud services, but also resist user collusion. In addition, in our model, objective assessments are used as benchmarks to filter out potentially biased subjective assessments, and then objective assessments and subjective assessments are aggregated to evaluate the overall performance of a cloud service. Furthermore, our model takes the contexts of objective assessments and subjective assessments into account. By calculating the similarity between different contexts, the benchmark level of objective assessments is dynamically adjusted according to context similarity, and the aggregated final scores of alternative cloud services are weighted by the similarity between the contexts of a potential cloud consumer and every testing party. This makes our cloud service selection model reflect potential cloud consumers' customized requirements more effectively. Finally, our proposed model is evaluated through the experiments conducted under different conditions. The experimental results demonstrate that our model significantly outperforms the existing work, especially in the resistance of user collusion.

AB - Due to the diversity and dynamic nature of cloud services, it is usually hard for potential cloud consumers to select the most suitable cloud service. This paper proposes CCCloud: a context-aware and credible cloud service selection model based on the comparison and aggregation of subjective assessments extracted from ordinary cloud consumers and objective assessments from quantitative performance testing parties. We propose a novel approach to evaluate cloud users' credibility, which not only can accurately evaluate how truthfully they assess cloud services, but also resist user collusion. In addition, in our model, objective assessments are used as benchmarks to filter out potentially biased subjective assessments, and then objective assessments and subjective assessments are aggregated to evaluate the overall performance of a cloud service. Furthermore, our model takes the contexts of objective assessments and subjective assessments into account. By calculating the similarity between different contexts, the benchmark level of objective assessments is dynamically adjusted according to context similarity, and the aggregated final scores of alternative cloud services are weighted by the similarity between the contexts of a potential cloud consumer and every testing party. This makes our cloud service selection model reflect potential cloud consumers' customized requirements more effectively. Finally, our proposed model is evaluated through the experiments conducted under different conditions. The experimental results demonstrate that our model significantly outperforms the existing work, especially in the resistance of user collusion.

KW - cloud service selection

KW - context similarity

KW - credibility of cloud users

KW - subjective or objective assessments

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84932601475&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84932601475&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/TSC.2015.2413111

DO - 10.1109/TSC.2015.2413111

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84932601475

VL - 8

SP - 369

EP - 383

JO - IEEE Transactions on Services Computing

JF - IEEE Transactions on Services Computing

SN - 1939-1374

IS - 3

M1 - 7060708

ER -