Abstract
People generally accept that there is causation by omission—that the omission of some events cause some related events. But this acceptance elicits the selection problem, or the difficulty of explaining the selection of a particular omissive cause or class of causes from the causal conditions. Some theorists contend that dependence theories of causation cannot resolve this problem. In this paper, we argue that the appeal to norms adequately resolves the selection problem for dependence theories, and we provide novel experimental evidence for it.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-14 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Australasian Journal of Philosophy |
| DOIs | |
| State | Accepted/In press - May 1 2015 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- causation
- counterfactual dependence
- omission
- process theories, norm
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Philosophy
Cite this
Cause by Omission and Norm : Not Watering Plants. / Henne, Paul; Pinillos, Nestor; De Brigard, Felipe.
In: Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 01.05.2015, p. 1-14.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Cause by Omission and Norm
T2 - Not Watering Plants
AU - Henne, Paul
AU - Pinillos, Nestor
AU - De Brigard, Felipe
PY - 2015/5/1
Y1 - 2015/5/1
N2 - People generally accept that there is causation by omission—that the omission of some events cause some related events. But this acceptance elicits the selection problem, or the difficulty of explaining the selection of a particular omissive cause or class of causes from the causal conditions. Some theorists contend that dependence theories of causation cannot resolve this problem. In this paper, we argue that the appeal to norms adequately resolves the selection problem for dependence theories, and we provide novel experimental evidence for it.
AB - People generally accept that there is causation by omission—that the omission of some events cause some related events. But this acceptance elicits the selection problem, or the difficulty of explaining the selection of a particular omissive cause or class of causes from the causal conditions. Some theorists contend that dependence theories of causation cannot resolve this problem. In this paper, we argue that the appeal to norms adequately resolves the selection problem for dependence theories, and we provide novel experimental evidence for it.
KW - causation
KW - counterfactual dependence
KW - omission
KW - process theories, norm
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84966697864&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84966697864&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/00048402.2016.1182567
DO - 10.1080/00048402.2016.1182567
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84966697864
SP - 1
EP - 14
JO - Australasian Journal of Philosophy
JF - Australasian Journal of Philosophy
SN - 0004-8402
ER -