Cause and effect: The free speech transformation as scientific revolution

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The model of direct, cause-and-effect speech was common not only in the social sciences early in the twentieth century, but also in the law. Speech-restrictive measures were written and judged with the belief that words may be the explicit cause of undesirable behavior. This article examines the transformation in free speech doctrine and its parallel track with the emergence of the social sciences. At the core of each was a change from direct- to limited-effects frameworks. It is posited that the paradigm shift in the law qualifies as a scientific revolution given (1) how it comports with the model explained by Thomas Kuhn in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, and (2) its adherence to scientific method.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)213-259
Number of pages47
JournalCommunication Law and Policy
Volume20
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 3 2015

Fingerprint

scientific revolution
Social sciences
cause
social science
Law
doctrine
twentieth century
paradigm

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law
  • Communication

Cite this

Cause and effect : The free speech transformation as scientific revolution. / Russomanno, Joseph.

In: Communication Law and Policy, Vol. 20, No. 3, 03.07.2015, p. 213-259.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d410d7548b814c05aeda8737c134eeaa,
title = "Cause and effect: The free speech transformation as scientific revolution",
abstract = "The model of direct, cause-and-effect speech was common not only in the social sciences early in the twentieth century, but also in the law. Speech-restrictive measures were written and judged with the belief that words may be the explicit cause of undesirable behavior. This article examines the transformation in free speech doctrine and its parallel track with the emergence of the social sciences. At the core of each was a change from direct- to limited-effects frameworks. It is posited that the paradigm shift in the law qualifies as a scientific revolution given (1) how it comports with the model explained by Thomas Kuhn in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, and (2) its adherence to scientific method.",
author = "Joseph Russomanno",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/10811680.2015.1051916",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "213--259",
journal = "Communication Law and Policy",
issn = "1081-1680",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cause and effect

T2 - The free speech transformation as scientific revolution

AU - Russomanno, Joseph

PY - 2015/7/3

Y1 - 2015/7/3

N2 - The model of direct, cause-and-effect speech was common not only in the social sciences early in the twentieth century, but also in the law. Speech-restrictive measures were written and judged with the belief that words may be the explicit cause of undesirable behavior. This article examines the transformation in free speech doctrine and its parallel track with the emergence of the social sciences. At the core of each was a change from direct- to limited-effects frameworks. It is posited that the paradigm shift in the law qualifies as a scientific revolution given (1) how it comports with the model explained by Thomas Kuhn in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, and (2) its adherence to scientific method.

AB - The model of direct, cause-and-effect speech was common not only in the social sciences early in the twentieth century, but also in the law. Speech-restrictive measures were written and judged with the belief that words may be the explicit cause of undesirable behavior. This article examines the transformation in free speech doctrine and its parallel track with the emergence of the social sciences. At the core of each was a change from direct- to limited-effects frameworks. It is posited that the paradigm shift in the law qualifies as a scientific revolution given (1) how it comports with the model explained by Thomas Kuhn in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, and (2) its adherence to scientific method.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84943231106&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84943231106&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10811680.2015.1051916

DO - 10.1080/10811680.2015.1051916

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84943231106

VL - 20

SP - 213

EP - 259

JO - Communication Law and Policy

JF - Communication Law and Policy

SN - 1081-1680

IS - 3

ER -