Capitalizing on categories of social construction

A review and integration of organizational research on symbolic management strategies

Andrew K. Schnackenberg, Jonathan Bundy, Corinne A. Coen, James D. Westphal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Symbols are habitually used by organizations to transform the meaning of their actions and intentions in ways that enable them to manage complex stakeholder relationships and achieve competitive advantage. However, applications of symbolic management across disciplines and research traditions in the organization sciences are fraught with theoretical ambiguity pertaining to the meaning of symbols, the value of symbols to organizations, the tactics used by organizations to manage symbols, and the outcomes of symbolic management. Thus, we review the literature to solidify our theoretical understanding of organizational symbolic management. Based on our review, we advance a process framework of symbolic management to describe the relationships between organizational approaches to managing symbols, the forms of symbolic value organizations seek to create and capture, and the prevailing outcomes of symbolic management. Using this framework, we also examine the literature for insights pertaining to the management of symbols for competitive advantage in separate contexts of organization–stakeholder interaction, leading to the development of a strategic framework of symbolic management. We conclude by outlining a set of directions for future research that evoke pressing questions about the role of symbolic management in organizations to encourage new pastures of scholarly inquiry.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)375-413
Number of pages39
JournalAcademy of Management Annals
Volume13
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2019

Fingerprint

Social construction
Organizational research
Management strategy
Symbol
Competitive advantage
Interaction
Pressing
Tactics
Stakeholder relationships
Strategic framework

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

Capitalizing on categories of social construction : A review and integration of organizational research on symbolic management strategies. / Schnackenberg, Andrew K.; Bundy, Jonathan; Coen, Corinne A.; Westphal, James D.

In: Academy of Management Annals, Vol. 13, No. 2, 01.07.2019, p. 375-413.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{07ed84e59c2443c8bbcab14e7b7a67e9,
title = "Capitalizing on categories of social construction: A review and integration of organizational research on symbolic management strategies",
abstract = "Symbols are habitually used by organizations to transform the meaning of their actions and intentions in ways that enable them to manage complex stakeholder relationships and achieve competitive advantage. However, applications of symbolic management across disciplines and research traditions in the organization sciences are fraught with theoretical ambiguity pertaining to the meaning of symbols, the value of symbols to organizations, the tactics used by organizations to manage symbols, and the outcomes of symbolic management. Thus, we review the literature to solidify our theoretical understanding of organizational symbolic management. Based on our review, we advance a process framework of symbolic management to describe the relationships between organizational approaches to managing symbols, the forms of symbolic value organizations seek to create and capture, and the prevailing outcomes of symbolic management. Using this framework, we also examine the literature for insights pertaining to the management of symbols for competitive advantage in separate contexts of organization–stakeholder interaction, leading to the development of a strategic framework of symbolic management. We conclude by outlining a set of directions for future research that evoke pressing questions about the role of symbolic management in organizations to encourage new pastures of scholarly inquiry.",
author = "Schnackenberg, {Andrew K.} and Jonathan Bundy and Coen, {Corinne A.} and Westphal, {James D.}",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5465/annals.2017.0096",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "375--413",
journal = "Academy of Management Annals",
issn = "1941-6520",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Capitalizing on categories of social construction

T2 - A review and integration of organizational research on symbolic management strategies

AU - Schnackenberg, Andrew K.

AU - Bundy, Jonathan

AU - Coen, Corinne A.

AU - Westphal, James D.

PY - 2019/7/1

Y1 - 2019/7/1

N2 - Symbols are habitually used by organizations to transform the meaning of their actions and intentions in ways that enable them to manage complex stakeholder relationships and achieve competitive advantage. However, applications of symbolic management across disciplines and research traditions in the organization sciences are fraught with theoretical ambiguity pertaining to the meaning of symbols, the value of symbols to organizations, the tactics used by organizations to manage symbols, and the outcomes of symbolic management. Thus, we review the literature to solidify our theoretical understanding of organizational symbolic management. Based on our review, we advance a process framework of symbolic management to describe the relationships between organizational approaches to managing symbols, the forms of symbolic value organizations seek to create and capture, and the prevailing outcomes of symbolic management. Using this framework, we also examine the literature for insights pertaining to the management of symbols for competitive advantage in separate contexts of organization–stakeholder interaction, leading to the development of a strategic framework of symbolic management. We conclude by outlining a set of directions for future research that evoke pressing questions about the role of symbolic management in organizations to encourage new pastures of scholarly inquiry.

AB - Symbols are habitually used by organizations to transform the meaning of their actions and intentions in ways that enable them to manage complex stakeholder relationships and achieve competitive advantage. However, applications of symbolic management across disciplines and research traditions in the organization sciences are fraught with theoretical ambiguity pertaining to the meaning of symbols, the value of symbols to organizations, the tactics used by organizations to manage symbols, and the outcomes of symbolic management. Thus, we review the literature to solidify our theoretical understanding of organizational symbolic management. Based on our review, we advance a process framework of symbolic management to describe the relationships between organizational approaches to managing symbols, the forms of symbolic value organizations seek to create and capture, and the prevailing outcomes of symbolic management. Using this framework, we also examine the literature for insights pertaining to the management of symbols for competitive advantage in separate contexts of organization–stakeholder interaction, leading to the development of a strategic framework of symbolic management. We conclude by outlining a set of directions for future research that evoke pressing questions about the role of symbolic management in organizations to encourage new pastures of scholarly inquiry.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070003805&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070003805&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5465/annals.2017.0096

DO - 10.5465/annals.2017.0096

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 375

EP - 413

JO - Academy of Management Annals

JF - Academy of Management Annals

SN - 1941-6520

IS - 2

ER -