Can Situational and Structural Factors Differentiate Between Intimate Partner and "Other" Homicide?

Christina DeJong, Jesenia Pizarro-Terrill, Edmund F. McGarrell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A large body of research has identified strong and consistent correlates of aggregated intimate homicide incidents; however, the bulk of these studies focuses on the influence of either case or neighborhood characteristics on homicide types, but not both. This study examines data collected from 739 homicides in two distinct metropolitan cities to determine which factors differentiate intimate and non-intimate homicide. Findings reveal that intimate partner homicides (IPH) are more likely to involve females both as victims and offenders when compared to non-IPH incidents. In addition, IPH homicides are more likely to be committed with weapons than non-IPH, but this finding only appears in Indianapolis homicides. Indeed, one of the stark contrasts between Indianapolis and Newark was the much greater prevalence of firearms involved in IPH homicides in Indianapolis. This suggests the need for future research that sorts out patterns of household gun possession, factors influencing community levels of household gun possession, and the use of legally- or illegally-possessed firearms in IPH homicide.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)365-376
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Family Violence
Volume26
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Homicide
homicide
Firearms
possession
incident
Weapons
weapon
offender

Keywords

  • Domestic violence
  • Economic deprivation
  • Female inequality
  • Homicide
  • Intimate partner homicide
  • Social disorganization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Law
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Can Situational and Structural Factors Differentiate Between Intimate Partner and "Other" Homicide? / DeJong, Christina; Pizarro-Terrill, Jesenia; McGarrell, Edmund F.

In: Journal of Family Violence, Vol. 26, No. 5, 07.2011, p. 365-376.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b3a0b99c79a643169dceb0d2211b3d8f,
title = "Can Situational and Structural Factors Differentiate Between Intimate Partner and {"}Other{"} Homicide?",
abstract = "A large body of research has identified strong and consistent correlates of aggregated intimate homicide incidents; however, the bulk of these studies focuses on the influence of either case or neighborhood characteristics on homicide types, but not both. This study examines data collected from 739 homicides in two distinct metropolitan cities to determine which factors differentiate intimate and non-intimate homicide. Findings reveal that intimate partner homicides (IPH) are more likely to involve females both as victims and offenders when compared to non-IPH incidents. In addition, IPH homicides are more likely to be committed with weapons than non-IPH, but this finding only appears in Indianapolis homicides. Indeed, one of the stark contrasts between Indianapolis and Newark was the much greater prevalence of firearms involved in IPH homicides in Indianapolis. This suggests the need for future research that sorts out patterns of household gun possession, factors influencing community levels of household gun possession, and the use of legally- or illegally-possessed firearms in IPH homicide.",
keywords = "Domestic violence, Economic deprivation, Female inequality, Homicide, Intimate partner homicide, Social disorganization",
author = "Christina DeJong and Jesenia Pizarro-Terrill and McGarrell, {Edmund F.}",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1007/s10896-011-9371-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "365--376",
journal = "Journal of Fluorescence",
issn = "1053-0509",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can Situational and Structural Factors Differentiate Between Intimate Partner and "Other" Homicide?

AU - DeJong, Christina

AU - Pizarro-Terrill, Jesenia

AU - McGarrell, Edmund F.

PY - 2011/7

Y1 - 2011/7

N2 - A large body of research has identified strong and consistent correlates of aggregated intimate homicide incidents; however, the bulk of these studies focuses on the influence of either case or neighborhood characteristics on homicide types, but not both. This study examines data collected from 739 homicides in two distinct metropolitan cities to determine which factors differentiate intimate and non-intimate homicide. Findings reveal that intimate partner homicides (IPH) are more likely to involve females both as victims and offenders when compared to non-IPH incidents. In addition, IPH homicides are more likely to be committed with weapons than non-IPH, but this finding only appears in Indianapolis homicides. Indeed, one of the stark contrasts between Indianapolis and Newark was the much greater prevalence of firearms involved in IPH homicides in Indianapolis. This suggests the need for future research that sorts out patterns of household gun possession, factors influencing community levels of household gun possession, and the use of legally- or illegally-possessed firearms in IPH homicide.

AB - A large body of research has identified strong and consistent correlates of aggregated intimate homicide incidents; however, the bulk of these studies focuses on the influence of either case or neighborhood characteristics on homicide types, but not both. This study examines data collected from 739 homicides in two distinct metropolitan cities to determine which factors differentiate intimate and non-intimate homicide. Findings reveal that intimate partner homicides (IPH) are more likely to involve females both as victims and offenders when compared to non-IPH incidents. In addition, IPH homicides are more likely to be committed with weapons than non-IPH, but this finding only appears in Indianapolis homicides. Indeed, one of the stark contrasts between Indianapolis and Newark was the much greater prevalence of firearms involved in IPH homicides in Indianapolis. This suggests the need for future research that sorts out patterns of household gun possession, factors influencing community levels of household gun possession, and the use of legally- or illegally-possessed firearms in IPH homicide.

KW - Domestic violence

KW - Economic deprivation

KW - Female inequality

KW - Homicide

KW - Intimate partner homicide

KW - Social disorganization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79959534509&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79959534509&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10896-011-9371-7

DO - 10.1007/s10896-011-9371-7

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79959534509

VL - 26

SP - 365

EP - 376

JO - Journal of Fluorescence

JF - Journal of Fluorescence

SN - 1053-0509

IS - 5

ER -