Bycatch: interactional expertise, dolphins and the US tuna fishery

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The burgeoning field of studies in expertise and experience (SEE) is a useful theoretical approach to complex problems. In light of SEE, examination of the controversial and well known case study of dolphin bycatch in the US tuna fishery, reveals that effective problem-solving was hindered by institutional tensions in respect of decision-making authority and difficulties with the integration of different expertises. Comparing the profiles of four individuals, who played distinct roles in the problem-solving process, I show that (1) to address a complex problem, a suite of contributory expertises-rarely found in one individual-may be required; (2) formal credentials are not a reliable indicator of who possesses these necessary expertises; (3) interactional expertise and interactive ability are useful tools in combining the contributory expertises of others to yield a desirable collective outcome; and (4) the concepts of contributory expertise and no expertise are useful tools for understanding the actual contribution of various parties to the problem-solving process.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)698-712
Number of pages15
JournalStudies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A
Volume38
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Interactional Expertise
Fisheries
Expertise
Problem Solving
Authority
Decision Making

Keywords

  • Bycatch
  • Conservation technology
  • Expertise and experience
  • Interactional expertise
  • Invention
  • Tuna-dolphin

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History

Cite this

Bycatch : interactional expertise, dolphins and the US tuna fishery. / Jenkins, Lekelia.

In: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, Vol. 38, No. 4, 12.2007, p. 698-712.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{28303bd4550144f889bc12ba0e843c20,
title = "Bycatch: interactional expertise, dolphins and the US tuna fishery",
abstract = "The burgeoning field of studies in expertise and experience (SEE) is a useful theoretical approach to complex problems. In light of SEE, examination of the controversial and well known case study of dolphin bycatch in the US tuna fishery, reveals that effective problem-solving was hindered by institutional tensions in respect of decision-making authority and difficulties with the integration of different expertises. Comparing the profiles of four individuals, who played distinct roles in the problem-solving process, I show that (1) to address a complex problem, a suite of contributory expertises-rarely found in one individual-may be required; (2) formal credentials are not a reliable indicator of who possesses these necessary expertises; (3) interactional expertise and interactive ability are useful tools in combining the contributory expertises of others to yield a desirable collective outcome; and (4) the concepts of contributory expertise and no expertise are useful tools for understanding the actual contribution of various parties to the problem-solving process.",
keywords = "Bycatch, Conservation technology, Expertise and experience, Interactional expertise, Invention, Tuna-dolphin",
author = "Lekelia Jenkins",
year = "2007",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.shpsa.2007.09.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "698--712",
journal = "Studies in History and Philosophy of Science",
issn = "0039-3681",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bycatch

T2 - interactional expertise, dolphins and the US tuna fishery

AU - Jenkins, Lekelia

PY - 2007/12

Y1 - 2007/12

N2 - The burgeoning field of studies in expertise and experience (SEE) is a useful theoretical approach to complex problems. In light of SEE, examination of the controversial and well known case study of dolphin bycatch in the US tuna fishery, reveals that effective problem-solving was hindered by institutional tensions in respect of decision-making authority and difficulties with the integration of different expertises. Comparing the profiles of four individuals, who played distinct roles in the problem-solving process, I show that (1) to address a complex problem, a suite of contributory expertises-rarely found in one individual-may be required; (2) formal credentials are not a reliable indicator of who possesses these necessary expertises; (3) interactional expertise and interactive ability are useful tools in combining the contributory expertises of others to yield a desirable collective outcome; and (4) the concepts of contributory expertise and no expertise are useful tools for understanding the actual contribution of various parties to the problem-solving process.

AB - The burgeoning field of studies in expertise and experience (SEE) is a useful theoretical approach to complex problems. In light of SEE, examination of the controversial and well known case study of dolphin bycatch in the US tuna fishery, reveals that effective problem-solving was hindered by institutional tensions in respect of decision-making authority and difficulties with the integration of different expertises. Comparing the profiles of four individuals, who played distinct roles in the problem-solving process, I show that (1) to address a complex problem, a suite of contributory expertises-rarely found in one individual-may be required; (2) formal credentials are not a reliable indicator of who possesses these necessary expertises; (3) interactional expertise and interactive ability are useful tools in combining the contributory expertises of others to yield a desirable collective outcome; and (4) the concepts of contributory expertise and no expertise are useful tools for understanding the actual contribution of various parties to the problem-solving process.

KW - Bycatch

KW - Conservation technology

KW - Expertise and experience

KW - Interactional expertise

KW - Invention

KW - Tuna-dolphin

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=36549070108&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=36549070108&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.shpsa.2007.09.005

DO - 10.1016/j.shpsa.2007.09.005

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:36549070108

VL - 38

SP - 698

EP - 712

JO - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science

JF - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science

SN - 0039-3681

IS - 4

ER -